<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azed 2000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:27:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Manley</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123680</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Manley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do visit the and lit website to get a flavour of the AZ 2000 celebrations. Also, younger solvers, get started on this puzzle every week, so that the next generation has some decent clue-writers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do visit the and lit website to get a flavour of the AZ 2000 celebrations. Also, younger solvers, get started on this puzzle every week, so that the next generation has some decent clue-writers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sharkey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123345</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sharkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the difficulty of defining TWO THOUSAND, and the eagerly awaited slip, the phrase &#039;of their own devising&#039; in the competition rules allows the possibility that some entrants might offer something other than a standard cryptic clue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the difficulty of defining TWO THOUSAND, and the eagerly awaited slip, the phrase &#8216;of their own devising&#8217; in the competition rules allows the possibility that some entrants might offer something other than a standard cryptic clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnT</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123296</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Laws isn&#039;t quite correct - Azed has had few non-Chambers competition words. WINNIE-THE-POOH, RUDOLPH THE REINDEER and CHRISTMAS PRESENT spring to mind, as well as ONE THOUSAND.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Laws isn&#8217;t quite correct &#8211; Azed has had few non-Chambers competition words. WINNIE-THE-POOH, RUDOLPH THE REINDEER and CHRISTMAS PRESENT spring to mind, as well as ONE THOUSAND.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handel</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123231</link>
		<dc:creator>Handel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spent three to four hours over this, partly because I didn&#039;t have C (online OED instead) or Bradfords, but mainly because I didn&#039;t have L who generally works out all the ones I can&#039;t! Still, got there in the end. I was glad that this wasn&#039;t a real three-chilli puzzle, as it&#039;s hard to fit such things into the working week. The perimeter clue was perhaps a bit too obvious given the context, but enjoyable nevertheless. Needless to say, the lunch in Oxford was also most enjoyable, good to put a few faces to some familiar names, including JC himself!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spent three to four hours over this, partly because I didn&#8217;t have C (online OED instead) or Bradfords, but mainly because I didn&#8217;t have L who generally works out all the ones I can&#8217;t! Still, got there in the end. I was glad that this wasn&#8217;t a real three-chilli puzzle, as it&#8217;s hard to fit such things into the working week. The perimeter clue was perhaps a bit too obvious given the context, but enjoyable nevertheless. Needless to say, the lunch in Oxford was also most enjoyable, good to put a few faces to some familiar names, including JC himself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The trafites</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123220</link>
		<dc:creator>The trafites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I forgot to mention.  Once I finished, and had the phrase, I suddenly thought I had a &#039;Listener&#039; moment - completed the puzzle, got the phrase, but couldn&#039;t get the final last step of cracking the clue!

I was convinced for a while that the second word of the competition word was &#039;PRESENT&#039; due to the last word &#039;here&#039; in the phrase, but luckily after a night&#039;s sleep found the anagram after a few seconds of of drinking my first cup of tea in the morning (strange how that often happens?).

Nick]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot to mention.  Once I finished, and had the phrase, I suddenly thought I had a &#8216;Listener&#8217; moment &#8211; completed the puzzle, got the phrase, but couldn&#8217;t get the final last step of cracking the clue!</p>
<p>I was convinced for a while that the second word of the competition word was &#8216;PRESENT&#8217; due to the last word &#8216;here&#8217; in the phrase, but luckily after a night&#8217;s sleep found the anagram after a few seconds of of drinking my first cup of tea in the morning (strange how that often happens?).</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The trafites</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123218</link>
		<dc:creator>The trafites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this rather easier than I expected for a &#039;special&#039; prize puzzle, but good, nonetheless.

Also I too struggled to parse 2dn, and the way I thought turned out to be correct as above - but I knew it had to have a &#039;Z&#039; removed as I guessed the first word around the perimeter was &#039;AZED&#039;, so I had no issues with the alternative spelling.

32ac was my last solve, being a word I had never heard of.

TWO THOUSAND is difficult word[s] to clue, so I think my entry will be in the pile of &#039;unmentionables&#039; again :(

I was in Oxford with my wife for the lunch, very nice day indeed, and a pleasure to meet Azed and the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this rather easier than I expected for a &#8216;special&#8217; prize puzzle, but good, nonetheless.</p>
<p>Also I too struggled to parse 2dn, and the way I thought turned out to be correct as above &#8211; but I knew it had to have a &#8216;Z&#8217; removed as I guessed the first word around the perimeter was &#8216;AZED&#8217;, so I had no issues with the alternative spelling.</p>
<p>32ac was my last solve, being a word I had never heard of.</p>
<p>TWO THOUSAND is difficult word[s] to clue, so I think my entry will be in the pile of &#8216;unmentionables&#8217; again <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I was in Oxford with my wife for the lunch, very nice day indeed, and a pleasure to meet Azed and the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Laws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solvable over a couple of Sunday p.m. pints with minor aid from Chambers (1998) – ideal for the occasion.

Worth noting that Azed No. 2000 was in fact Crowther/Observer 2001 – a Gong puzzle featured in the intercalatory series of four in memory of Ximenes before Azed No. 1.

Also I think it&#039;s the first time the specified competition clue-word hasn&#039;t been in Chambers as such. It&#039;ll be fascinating to see how competitors define it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solvable over a couple of Sunday p.m. pints with minor aid from Chambers (1998) – ideal for the occasion.</p>
<p>Worth noting that Azed No. 2000 was in fact Crowther/Observer 2001 – a Gong puzzle featured in the intercalatory series of four in memory of Ximenes before Azed No. 1.</p>
<p>Also I think it&#8217;s the first time the specified competition clue-word hasn&#8217;t been in Chambers as such. It&#8217;ll be fascinating to see how competitors define it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/10/03/azed-2000/#comment-123171</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 23:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=21555#comment-123171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Peter for this thorough analysis. As you say, the puzzle wasn&#039;t as difficult as might have been expected, though I had to do a fair bit of hunting to find some of the answers. I guessed what the clue phrase was going to be before I even started on the puzzle, so it was just a case of verifying that the perimeter clue fitted it. Finding a good, or even adequate, clue of my own was, however, rather more of a struggle.

And the lunch in Oxford was very enjoyable too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter for this thorough analysis. As you say, the puzzle wasn&#8217;t as difficult as might have been expected, though I had to do a fair bit of hunting to find some of the answers. I guessed what the clue phrase was going to be before I even started on the puzzle, so it was just a case of verifying that the perimeter clue fitted it. Finding a good, or even adequate, clue of my own was, however, rather more of a struggle.</p>
<p>And the lunch in Oxford was very enjoyable too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
