<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Genius No. 88 / Pasquale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/01/guardian-genius-no-88-pasquale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/01/guardian-genius-no-88-pasquale/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/01/guardian-genius-no-88-pasquale/#comment-127361</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22537#comment-127361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought it was one of hubby&#039;s clues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was one of hubby&#8217;s clues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/01/guardian-genius-no-88-pasquale/#comment-127342</link>
		<dc:creator>jetdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22537#comment-127342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[… sorry — the first sentence doesn’t quite make sense, but I’m sure you get my meaning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>… sorry — the first sentence doesn’t quite make sense, but I’m sure you get my meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/01/guardian-genius-no-88-pasquale/#comment-127341</link>
		<dc:creator>jetdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22537#comment-127341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apologies to all for my failure to check the rota, and hence to give this one a miss. Many thanks to Gaufrid for standing in at very short notice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies to all for my failure to check the rota, and hence to give this one a miss. Many thanks to Gaufrid for standing in at very short notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/01/guardian-genius-no-88-pasquale/#comment-127317</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22537#comment-127317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the blog, Gaufrid.  I actually made a few notes when I had completed this one.  A month is a long time to remember ones thoughts.

I am full of admiration for the ingenuity displayed by the setters of the Genius crosswords and enjoy them, but I was disappointed with this one.  Knowing which letter was missing from the full solution made the puzzle much easier than many weekday offerings.  

I was only challenged by a few words and definitions which needed to be confirmed by Chambers:  sondeli, arryish, … all of which were easily solvable from the subsidiary parts of the clue plus the missing letter.

25 was the only one which taxed me.  I had not heard of Michael Innes and really didn’t think that minnies could be Scottish mothers.  Thank you, Google and Chambers.

I did enjoy the mental picture of someone playing the NOSE LUTE and wondered if the ROUHAHAS disturbed the Australian bush. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the blog, Gaufrid.  I actually made a few notes when I had completed this one.  A month is a long time to remember ones thoughts.</p>
<p>I am full of admiration for the ingenuity displayed by the setters of the Genius crosswords and enjoy them, but I was disappointed with this one.  Knowing which letter was missing from the full solution made the puzzle much easier than many weekday offerings.  </p>
<p>I was only challenged by a few words and definitions which needed to be confirmed by Chambers:  sondeli, arryish, … all of which were easily solvable from the subsidiary parts of the clue plus the missing letter.</p>
<p>25 was the only one which taxed me.  I had not heard of Michael Innes and really didn’t think that minnies could be Scottish mothers.  Thank you, Google and Chambers.</p>
<p>I did enjoy the mental picture of someone playing the NOSE LUTE and wondered if the ROUHAHAS disturbed the Australian bush. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
