<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inquisitor 1152: Tirade by Loda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/#comment-132029</link>
		<dc:creator>scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22911#comment-132029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks HolyGhost.
 I also looked at the other diagonal,it would have given a really nice finish to the puzzle if Loda could have worked that in!( I don&#039;t ask for much do I?) :)
Thought this was another super puzzle in the Inquisitor series,just about the right level of difficulty for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks HolyGhost.<br />
 I also looked at the other diagonal,it would have given a really nice finish to the puzzle if Loda could have worked that in!( I don&#8217;t ask for much do I?) <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thought this was another super puzzle in the Inquisitor series,just about the right level of difficulty for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/#comment-131532</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22911#comment-131532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, disregard that rather presumptuous correction. I was thinking of a different, later, puzzle where the opposite situation may have applied.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, disregard that rather presumptuous correction. I was thinking of a different, later, puzzle where the opposite situation may have applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/#comment-131530</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22911#comment-131530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyed this puzzle a lot; Inquisitor is still my favourite of them all.

I agree with Mike re unchecked squares (though I suspect you meant &quot;effectively checked&quot;?) I&#039;ll admit to a small double-take, but it all added up quite swiftly.

Many thanks to HolyGhost for the excellent blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed this puzzle a lot; Inquisitor is still my favourite of them all.</p>
<p>I agree with Mike re unchecked squares (though I suspect you meant &#8220;effectively checked&#8221;?) I&#8217;ll admit to a small double-take, but it all added up quite swiftly.</p>
<p>Many thanks to HolyGhost for the excellent blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/#comment-131326</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22911#comment-131326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coming to this blog fairly late - but would just like to declare this is the second Inquisitor I&#039;ve tackled and solved! I&#039;m chuffed with 2 out of 2 (which is a double whammy really - it means I&#039;ve solved the puzzle &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; understood the preamble).

As for the way the unchecked letters were presented, I always understood it was rule anyway that thematic cross-checking answer cells had to be included in the &#039;list&#039;, so I wasn&#039;t thrown by that. I was thrown entirely by some of the wordplay though, so many thanks to HG for clearing them up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming to this blog fairly late &#8211; but would just like to declare this is the second Inquisitor I&#8217;ve tackled and solved! I&#8217;m chuffed with 2 out of 2 (which is a double whammy really &#8211; it means I&#8217;ve solved the puzzle <i>and</i> understood the preamble).</p>
<p>As for the way the unchecked letters were presented, I always understood it was rule anyway that thematic cross-checking answer cells had to be included in the &#8216;list&#8217;, so I wasn&#8217;t thrown by that. I was thrown entirely by some of the wordplay though, so many thanks to HG for clearing them up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/#comment-131064</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Laws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22911#comment-131064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My attitude is that where unclued words cross each other, the letters in those squares are effectively unchecked, so I didn&#039;t see it as an error in Loda&#039;s preamble. In addition, leaving the unclued words untinted helps the solver check letter-counts, thereby confirming which squares contain the letters in the phrase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My attitude is that where unclued words cross each other, the letters in those squares are effectively unchecked, so I didn&#8217;t see it as an error in Loda&#8217;s preamble. In addition, leaving the unclued words untinted helps the solver check letter-counts, thereby confirming which squares contain the letters in the phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi of Hihoba</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/24/inquisitor-1152-tirade-by-loda/#comment-131029</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi of Hihoba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=22911#comment-131029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this, though Ba was concerned about the blasphemy! Nicely clued and several required some serious thought.
Was I alone in finding that three &quot;unchecked&quot; letters in the phrase &quot;BARRY . . GO&quot; were actually mutually cross-checked, meaning that I had three letters left over (Y, D and I) after the elimination of the unchecked?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this, though Ba was concerned about the blasphemy! Nicely clued and several required some serious thought.<br />
Was I alone in finding that three &#8220;unchecked&#8221; letters in the phrase &#8220;BARRY . . GO&#8221; were actually mutually cross-checked, meaning that I had three letters left over (Y, D and I) after the elimination of the unchecked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
