<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,552 / Mudd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/25/financial-times-13552-mudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/25/financial-times-13552-mudd/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 05:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/25/financial-times-13552-mudd/#comment-131486</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23222#comment-131486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in an agree-mood today, so I agree on &#039;young&#039; being superfluous and on this puzzle being slightly harder and/or more ingenious than the average Mudd [like in the clever constructions of the Down Triple 7, 8, 11].

NOEL was my last one to go in, and I think the definition is rather nice (&#039;the present time&#039;), or is it an old chestnut?

I especially liked the fine anagram of SIAMESE TWINS (15ac).
Never heard of MEGAPARSEC, but quite nice that &#039;space age&#039; was part of it.

The explanation for the &#039;upside-down&#039; device is - I think - indeed that the &quot;upper side&quot; goes &quot;down&quot;. Fine by me, and let us, please, not accuse Mr Halpern of another mistake (after the two in today&#039;s Paul).

Finally, according to Chambers RIVER MOUTH consists of two words, so not (10) - but maybe other dictionaries think differently.

All in all, I enjoyed this puzzle, never as witty as a Paul but always well-constructed and satisfying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in an agree-mood today, so I agree on &#8216;young&#8217; being superfluous and on this puzzle being slightly harder and/or more ingenious than the average Mudd [like in the clever constructions of the Down Triple 7, 8, 11].</p>
<p>NOEL was my last one to go in, and I think the definition is rather nice (&#8216;the present time&#8217;), or is it an old chestnut?</p>
<p>I especially liked the fine anagram of SIAMESE TWINS (15ac).<br />
Never heard of MEGAPARSEC, but quite nice that &#8216;space age&#8217; was part of it.</p>
<p>The explanation for the &#8216;upside-down&#8217; device is &#8211; I think &#8211; indeed that the &#8220;upper side&#8221; goes &#8220;down&#8221;. Fine by me, and let us, please, not accuse Mr Halpern of another mistake (after the two in today&#8217;s Paul).</p>
<p>Finally, according to Chambers RIVER MOUTH consists of two words, so not (10) &#8211; but maybe other dictionaries think differently.</p>
<p>All in all, I enjoyed this puzzle, never as witty as a Paul but always well-constructed and satisfying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/25/financial-times-13552-mudd/#comment-131365</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 16:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23222#comment-131365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid. There was the usual ingenious and entertaining wordplay from Mudd today. I found this moderately difficult and it took me a long time to get Dinosaur from the anagram at the end even though I knew I was looking for a synonym for an old-fashioned person. Some of the surfaces were not very smooth, notably 4A and 5D. I agree with Gaufred about the superfluous Young in 9A and I also cannot see the point of Old in 5D.
I had no problems with Ottawa though, it is clued in a similar way in today’s Times, also using a reversal of the Scottish engineer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid. There was the usual ingenious and entertaining wordplay from Mudd today. I found this moderately difficult and it took me a long time to get Dinosaur from the anagram at the end even though I knew I was looking for a synonym for an old-fashioned person. Some of the surfaces were not very smooth, notably 4A and 5D. I agree with Gaufred about the superfluous Young in 9A and I also cannot see the point of Old in 5D.<br />
I had no problems with Ottawa though, it is clued in a similar way in today’s Times, also using a reversal of the Scottish engineer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/25/financial-times-13552-mudd/#comment-131316</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23222#comment-131316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi deke
Thanks. How did I miss that? A case of seeing what you expect to see, perhaps. 

As this is a down clue the &#039;upside-down&#039; must mean that the first letter of ELK is moved to the bottom to give LKE rather than it indicating a reversal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi deke<br />
Thanks. How did I miss that? A case of seeing what you expect to see, perhaps. </p>
<p>As this is a down clue the &#8216;upside-down&#8217; must mean that the first letter of ELK is moved to the bottom to give LKE rather than it indicating a reversal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deke</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/11/25/financial-times-13552-mudd/#comment-131312</link>
		<dc:creator>deke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23222#comment-131312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fine puzzle, but in 5D, &quot;LKE&quot; is neither upside-down nor  reversed  &quot;ELK&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine puzzle, but in 5D, &#8220;LKE&#8221; is neither upside-down nor  reversed  &#8220;ELK&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
