<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,183 &#8211; Arachne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-144567</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-144567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m late again as usual too.

I took &#039;elements&#039; in 24d to be Argon, Carbon and Hydrogen; giving ARCH.  Maybe I&#039;m wrong too!

For anyone reading, have a great Christmas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m late again as usual too.</p>
<p>I took &#8216;elements&#8217; in 24d to be Argon, Carbon and Hydrogen; giving ARCH.  Maybe I&#8217;m wrong too!</p>
<p>For anyone reading, have a great Christmas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Hay</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-138785</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Hay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 05:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-138785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here I come again, with the _Guardian Weekly_ a week after everyone else.

I took 21D (motet) as whit=mo + tet=religious (festival in Vietnam. Remember the Tet offensive?)) 

But I&#039;m probably wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here I come again, with the _Guardian Weekly_ a week after everyone else.</p>
<p>I took 21D (motet) as whit=mo + tet=religious (festival in Vietnam. Remember the Tet offensive?)) </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m probably wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133754</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed so K&#039;s D (reservations regarding lateness as above ~ the which may prevent this from being &#039;Gaufrided&#039; ...) although I&#039;d certainly have picked someone commanding more respect than Blair to fight my corner in a debate of this sort. Don&#039;t think he stood a chance. The real winners here seem to have been the organisers anyway, who ended up quids in !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed so K&#8217;s D (reservations regarding lateness as above ~ the which may prevent this from being &#8216;Gaufrided&#8217; &#8230;) although I&#8217;d certainly have picked someone commanding more respect than Blair to fight my corner in a debate of this sort. Don&#8217;t think he stood a chance. The real winners here seem to have been the organisers anyway, who ended up quids in !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133435</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger, you&#039;re right, of course!  But I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much danger of the (oftentimes heated) debate about His influence in our lives disappearing any time soon ...  Hitchens and Blair was interesting, for example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger, you&#8217;re right, of course!  But I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much danger of the (oftentimes heated) debate about His influence in our lives disappearing any time soon &#8230;  Hitchens and Blair was interesting, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhl</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133434</link>
		<dc:creator>mhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the post, Andrew - this was another enjoyable crossword in a strong week, I think.

I&#039;ve never seen the Jeremy Kyle show, but I gather one can get a sense of the programme from this compilation of its guests repeating a particularly irksome cliché:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_531bFsrjA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, Andrew &#8211; this was another enjoyable crossword in a strong week, I think.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen the Jeremy Kyle show, but I gather one can get a sense of the programme from this compilation of its guests repeating a particularly irksome cliché:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_531bFsrjA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_531bFsrjA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133427</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; happy, K&#039;s D @17 (should you or anyone else happen on this late comment). It would, after all, deny him a fair chunk of his livelihood !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not <i>that</i> happy, K&#8217;s D @17 (should you or anyone else happen on this late comment). It would, after all, deny him a fair chunk of his livelihood !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133360</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I arrived at the same answers as Davy. I thought I detected a theme of removing letters from, usually, the middle of words, so I took 17a to be GODBLESS, drop the B somehow, gives GODLESS; then 18d SENSATIONALIST, drop the ATIONAL somehow, gives SENSIST. It all so nearly worked!
For 12a KYLE I consulted my teenage daughter, who knows about these things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I arrived at the same answers as Davy. I thought I detected a theme of removing letters from, usually, the middle of words, so I took 17a to be GODBLESS, drop the B somehow, gives GODLESS; then 18d SENSATIONALIST, drop the ATIONAL somehow, gives SENSIST. It all so nearly worked!<br />
For 12a KYLE I consulted my teenage daughter, who knows about these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrc</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133296</link>
		<dc:creator>rrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think kyle did a spot on radio before moving to TV  - sort of agony uncle  I quite enjoyed this and even grinned at times]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think kyle did a spot on radio before moving to TV  &#8211; sort of agony uncle  I quite enjoyed this and even grinned at times</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133277</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andrew, 

In contrast with some, the first clue I got was KYLE which just seemed so obvious. I have no interest in the man or his dreadful show but he is often referred to by assorted people including comedians and so the name sticks.

I had an interesting answer to 17a which unfortunately was wrong. I put GODLESS which I thought was a poor homophone for godbless. This of course screwed up DENTIST for which I put SENSIST ie a thrill seeker. Hey ho!.

Thanks Arachne for an entertaining puzzle]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew, </p>
<p>In contrast with some, the first clue I got was KYLE which just seemed so obvious. I have no interest in the man or his dreadful show but he is often referred to by assorted people including comedians and so the name sticks.</p>
<p>I had an interesting answer to 17a which unfortunately was wrong. I put GODLESS which I thought was a poor homophone for godbless. This of course screwed up DENTIST for which I put SENSIST ie a thrill seeker. Hey ho!.</p>
<p>Thanks Arachne for an entertaining puzzle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/02/guardian-25183-arachne/#comment-133186</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23254#comment-133186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen
No harm meant! :)I know what you are saying, too, and am simply noting it is ultimately a common (and perhaps therefore acceptable)  misreading of &#039;hull&#039; (trans. to remove the hull, shell, or husk of; to strip off the outer covering) and &#039;calyx&#039; (in sensu stricto not the stalk but the green outer petals). 

Incidentally, and more interestingly I hope, I have just accessed the new OED which came on line yesterday. I understand no printed edition will be produced. I gather from earlier comments that a variety of libraries including local ones can provide home access - in my opinion, at least, it is well worth getting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen<br />
No harm meant! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I know what you are saying, too, and am simply noting it is ultimately a common (and perhaps therefore acceptable)  misreading of &#8216;hull&#8217; (trans. to remove the hull, shell, or husk of; to strip off the outer covering) and &#8216;calyx&#8217; (in sensu stricto not the stalk but the green outer petals). </p>
<p>Incidentally, and more interestingly I hope, I have just accessed the new OED which came on line yesterday. I understand no printed edition will be produced. I gather from earlier comments that a variety of libraries including local ones can provide home access &#8211; in my opinion, at least, it is well worth getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
