<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,569 / Cinephile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143161</link>
		<dc:creator>scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid.
 A quick solve due to the fairly obvious theme - I seem to remember Araucaria(or possibly another setter) using it before.Parsing the clues was definately harder than filling the grid and there were certainly some liberties taken!
I couldn&#039;t come up with anything plausible for 1 across,so was pleased to see your explanation.
I have come across &quot;All one’s geese are swans&quot; somewhere before(Swift?) but it&#039;s not an expression in common use these days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid.<br />
 A quick solve due to the fairly obvious theme &#8211; I seem to remember Araucaria(or possibly another setter) using it before.Parsing the clues was definately harder than filling the grid and there were certainly some liberties taken!<br />
I couldn&#8217;t come up with anything plausible for 1 across,so was pleased to see your explanation.<br />
I have come across &#8220;All one’s geese are swans&#8221; somewhere before(Swift?) but it&#8217;s not an expression in common use these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: verbose</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143156</link>
		<dc:creator>verbose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I found 24ac delightful. I got it pretty easily and it elicited a chuckle. But I did find a number of the across clues difficult to parse: 1, 13 and 14, even 19. Thanks for the explanations, Gaufrid et al.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I found 24ac delightful. I got it pretty easily and it elicited a chuckle. But I did find a number of the across clues difficult to parse: 1, 13 and 14, even 19. Thanks for the explanations, Gaufrid et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143134</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Abu Amaal, yes, that&#039;s a possibility too.
However, it is more a Guardian thing to split up words in a clue nowadays rather than an FT &#039;device&#039; [that is, if you want to call it a &#039;device&#039; - I am not very keen on them, as people might know by now (because I think that these tricks could lead to a kind of cryptic anarchy in the negative sense of the word)].

Even though Cinephile is capable of doing it, I do not think that this explanation is how it is.
I&#039;ll stick to Gaufrid&#039;s hidden answer, knowing that Cinephile/Araucaria uses the word &#039;of&#039; regularly to indicate a hidden solution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Abu Amaal, yes, that&#8217;s a possibility too.<br />
However, it is more a Guardian thing to split up words in a clue nowadays rather than an FT &#8216;device&#8217; [that is, if you want to call it a 'device' - I am not very keen on them, as people might know by now (because I think that these tricks could lead to a kind of cryptic anarchy in the negative sense of the word)].</p>
<p>Even though Cinephile is capable of doing it, I do not think that this explanation is how it is.<br />
I&#8217;ll stick to Gaufrid&#8217;s hidden answer, knowing that Cinephile/Araucaria uses the word &#8216;of&#8217; regularly to indicate a hidden solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143133</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Lisa
Yes, part of each clue is a reference to the carol and the rest of the clue to 14ac is easily explained. My problem with the rest of 13ac lay with the fact that I had never heard the saying “All one’s geese are swans”. Fortunately Eileen pointed me in the right direction.

Hi Abu Amaal
Yes, knowing Cinephile&#039;s liberties, that is a valid parsing, but I still think I prefer the &#039;of&#039; as a &#039;hidden in&#039; indicator.

To both
I think this is your first post at 15². If so, welcome and please continue to add your valuable input.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lisa<br />
Yes, part of each clue is a reference to the carol and the rest of the clue to 14ac is easily explained. My problem with the rest of 13ac lay with the fact that I had never heard the saying “All one’s geese are swans”. Fortunately Eileen pointed me in the right direction.</p>
<p>Hi Abu Amaal<br />
Yes, knowing Cinephile&#8217;s liberties, that is a valid parsing, but I still think I prefer the &#8216;of&#8217; as a &#8216;hidden in&#8217; indicator.</p>
<p>To both<br />
I think this is your first post at 15². If so, welcome and please continue to add your valuable input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Amaal</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143122</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Amaal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[22d might also be parsed as &quot;start [ed war deliberately]&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22d might also be parsed as &#8220;start [ed war deliberately]&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143106</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Explanation for 19AC, GEESE: On the 6th day of Christmas, the gift was &quot;6 geese a-laying.&quot;
Explanation for 14AC, SWAN: On the 7th day, the gift was &quot;7 swans a-swimming.&quot;
I don&#039;t understand the confusion, once you know the puzzle&#039;s theme.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explanation for 19AC, GEESE: On the 6th day of Christmas, the gift was &#8220;6 geese a-laying.&#8221;<br />
Explanation for 14AC, SWAN: On the 7th day, the gift was &#8220;7 swans a-swimming.&#8221;<br />
I don&#8217;t understand the confusion, once you know the puzzle&#8217;s theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143066</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finished this one in near-record time and without looking up the carol!  I had no idea why BACKBITE but put it in anyway.  The last clue solved was CRETE, an awful clue imho.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finished this one in near-record time and without looking up the carol!  I had no idea why BACKBITE but put it in anyway.  The last clue solved was CRETE, an awful clue imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smiffy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143038</link>
		<dc:creator>smiffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog Gaufrid.  Particularly for shedding a beam of (multiply refracted) light on 1A.  The answer was obvious enough, but I gave up trying to parse the wordplay before coming here.  Like you, I had 24A flagged as pretty outlandish but, in comparison, that clue now seems almost orthodox!

I thought that 25A provided a rather generous opening into the theme - tantamount to a neon-lit front door. After spotting that, it all fell into place in a &lt;i&gt;&quot;By George&lt;/i&gt; (i.e. autopilot!), &lt;i&gt;I think I&#039;ve got it!&quot;&lt;/i&gt; kind of way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog Gaufrid.  Particularly for shedding a beam of (multiply refracted) light on 1A.  The answer was obvious enough, but I gave up trying to parse the wordplay before coming here.  Like you, I had 24A flagged as pretty outlandish but, in comparison, that clue now seems almost orthodox!</p>
<p>I thought that 25A provided a rather generous opening into the theme &#8211; tantamount to a neon-lit front door. After spotting that, it all fell into place in a <i>&#8220;By George</i> (i.e. autopilot!), <i>I think I&#8217;ve got it!&#8221;</i> kind of way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143026</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Eileen, got it now.
Only last week I &#039;had to&#039; sing this carol, in which there was &quot;calling&quot; - didn&#039;t know that it came from &quot;colly&quot;/&quot;collie&quot;.
Now the ellipsis makes more sense, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Eileen, got it now.<br />
Only last week I &#8216;had to&#8217; sing this carol, in which there was &#8220;calling&#8221; &#8211; didn&#8217;t know that it came from &#8220;colly&#8221;/&#8221;collie&#8221;.<br />
Now the ellipsis makes more sense, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/financial-times-13569-cinephile/#comment-143025</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23998#comment-143025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sil
The &#039;and some say&#039; in 2dn is an indicator that &#039;collie&#039; is a homophone of &#039;colly&#039;. Depending one which version of the carol is being sung, the line is either &#039;four calling birds&#039; or &#039;four colly birds&#039;. I was tought the latter but the former seems to be more prevelant these days.

In 22ac I took the &#039;of&#039; as the &#039;hidden in&#039; indicator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sil<br />
The &#8216;and some say&#8217; in 2dn is an indicator that &#8216;collie&#8217; is a homophone of &#8216;colly&#8217;. Depending one which version of the carol is being sung, the line is either &#8216;four calling birds&#8217; or &#8216;four colly birds&#8217;. I was tought the latter but the former seems to be more prevelant these days.</p>
<p>In 22ac I took the &#8216;of&#8217; as the &#8216;hidden in&#8217; indicator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
