<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,194 / Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143574</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS, ironically, the different strokes phrase is very common, or at least well known, on the colonial side of the pond.  Go figure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, ironically, the different strokes phrase is very common, or at least well known, on the colonial side of the pond.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143571</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen, thanks for the blog, and to Paul for the slow-moving stumper &#039;today&#039;.  This week went rough, I still have only four inked-in entries in Tuesday&#039;s Puck!

But having this one &quot;mostly&quot; done, I gave up and came here.  I note you &quot;apologize&quot; to furriners for &quot;CORGI&quot; the acronym, thank you, had it pencilled in with big question marks.  But no similar note for WHIPSNADE ZOO???  I thought it might be a zoo, but there was no real way to research what sort of zoo it might be.  Oh well.

The puzzle went from 1/4 finished to 3/4 finished when I got MOCK (trivial, eh?) which finally led me to Sync&#039;d swimmers (sorry disabled capslock on this machine...) which finally opened up the &quot;big answer&quot;, helping me with the NE corner.

My one pride is getting CURARE &quot;on my own&quot;.  Cheers all!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen, thanks for the blog, and to Paul for the slow-moving stumper &#8216;today&#8217;.  This week went rough, I still have only four inked-in entries in Tuesday&#8217;s Puck!</p>
<p>But having this one &#8220;mostly&#8221; done, I gave up and came here.  I note you &#8220;apologize&#8221; to furriners for &#8220;CORGI&#8221; the acronym, thank you, had it pencilled in with big question marks.  But no similar note for WHIPSNADE ZOO???  I thought it might be a zoo, but there was no real way to research what sort of zoo it might be.  Oh well.</p>
<p>The puzzle went from 1/4 finished to 3/4 finished when I got MOCK (trivial, eh?) which finally led me to Sync&#8217;d swimmers (sorry disabled capslock on this machine&#8230;) which finally opened up the &#8220;big answer&#8221;, helping me with the NE corner.</p>
<p>My one pride is getting CURARE &#8220;on my own&#8221;.  Cheers all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank king</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143396</link>
		<dc:creator>frank king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ref on pricklyash is actually biblical &#039;kick against the pricks&#039;=authority]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ref on pricklyash is actually biblical &#8216;kick against the pricks&#8217;=authority</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr DNA</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr DNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[grandpuzzler @ 23,

The phrase DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS certainly predates the eponymous sitcom: I know it from the lyrics to the Sly &amp; the Family Stone song &lt;i&gt;Everyday People&lt;/i&gt; from, I think, 1969.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grandpuzzler @ 23,</p>
<p>The phrase DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS certainly predates the eponymous sitcom: I know it from the lyrics to the Sly &amp; the Family Stone song <i>Everyday People</i> from, I think, 1969.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TokyoColin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143176</link>
		<dc:creator>TokyoColin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late to the party, but that is because I too fell asleep trying to finish this last night after a long, busy day.  Polished it off over breakfast this morning.  As others have said I found it a bit mixed but the good clues were very, very good.  

I particularly enjoyed the &quot;synchronised swimming&quot;/&quot;different strokes&quot; connection.  I got the strokes answer early on and am very familiar with the phrase.  I was surprised to see that not everyone is.  It certainly predates that dreadful TV show but I probably know it from my time in the US in the 70s.  (Yes, K&#039;sD I am certainly old enough to not only remember, but to still revere, the Fab Four.)

Many thanks Eileen for your excellent blog and your followup on the ensuing discussions.  I suppose Paul/Eileen is my favourite setter/blogger partnership!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the party, but that is because I too fell asleep trying to finish this last night after a long, busy day.  Polished it off over breakfast this morning.  As others have said I found it a bit mixed but the good clues were very, very good.  </p>
<p>I particularly enjoyed the &#8220;synchronised swimming&#8221;/&#8221;different strokes&#8221; connection.  I got the strokes answer early on and am very familiar with the phrase.  I was surprised to see that not everyone is.  It certainly predates that dreadful TV show but I probably know it from my time in the US in the 70s.  (Yes, K&#8217;sD I am certainly old enough to not only remember, but to still revere, the Fab Four.)</p>
<p>Many thanks Eileen for your excellent blog and your followup on the ensuing discussions.  I suppose Paul/Eileen is my favourite setter/blogger partnership!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143158</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen. As others have said, much to enjoy here ~ especially sheepish Dolly ! In 8d, I thought &#039;inferior to&#039; was a neat way of saying that &lt;i&gt;side&lt;/i&gt; is to be lower in position than &lt;i&gt;seta&lt;/i&gt;, given that it&#039;s a down clue. Thanks Paul, another nice one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen. As others have said, much to enjoy here ~ especially sheepish Dolly ! In 8d, I thought &#8216;inferior to&#8217; was a neat way of saying that <i>side</i> is to be lower in position than <i>seta</i>, given that it&#8217;s a down clue. Thanks Paul, another nice one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143142</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen
Thanks. I agree re &#039;clutching to&#039;. &#039;Taking to&#039; would be better perhaps, but it doesn&#039;t help all that much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen<br />
Thanks. I agree re &#8216;clutching to&#8217;. &#8216;Taking to&#8217; would be better perhaps, but it doesn&#8217;t help all that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143141</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Different strokes for different folks?
Yep.
Did this puzzle all by myself tonight, and I have to admit it didn&#039;t really set me on fire.

Why?
I don&#039;t know, maybe some clues were just a tad too easy (or had constructions that were a tiny bit too simple) like OPUS, MOCK, MINCE PIE, OFF COURSE or PLANET (guessed it rightaway from the first two words in the clue).
ANTOINETTE was poor, I thought (using one (related) girl to get another). Didn&#039;t like SHEEPISH either.

I have seen &#039;ham&#039; as an anagrind before, but that doesn&#039;t mean I like it. It is probably &#039;ham&#039; in the sense of &#039;clumsy&#039;? 
And capitalised, too - I know, don&#039;t explain, I surrender .... :)
Last one to go in was CORGI, and indeed, Eileen, the acronym was unknown to me, but it hád to that dog.

So, a relatively negative verdict?
Well, re-reading the clues, I must say that there&#039;s not much wrong with this crossword as such.
I had never heard of WHIPSNADE ZOO (had to Google), but it is nicely clued. And although I am getting tired of bottomed clues, 28ac (SWEETEN) was a highlight. Also liked TANGO and had to smile at SYNCHRONISED SWIMMING (one of my first entries) as it is [only in my opinion!] a ridiculous sport.

Good puzzle, but (for me) a bit uneven.
Some compared it to yesterday&#039;s Puck (where I compared that one yesterday to a Paul), but I&#039;m not sure whether Paul&#039;s the winner.
Last Saturday&#039;s prize crossword, thát was &quot;my&quot; Paul.
But more about that later.

Different strokes for different folks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different strokes for different folks?<br />
Yep.<br />
Did this puzzle all by myself tonight, and I have to admit it didn&#8217;t really set me on fire.</p>
<p>Why?<br />
I don&#8217;t know, maybe some clues were just a tad too easy (or had constructions that were a tiny bit too simple) like OPUS, MOCK, MINCE PIE, OFF COURSE or PLANET (guessed it rightaway from the first two words in the clue).<br />
ANTOINETTE was poor, I thought (using one (related) girl to get another). Didn&#8217;t like SHEEPISH either.</p>
<p>I have seen &#8216;ham&#8217; as an anagrind before, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I like it. It is probably &#8216;ham&#8217; in the sense of &#8216;clumsy&#8217;?<br />
And capitalised, too &#8211; I know, don&#8217;t explain, I surrender &#8230;. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Last one to go in was CORGI, and indeed, Eileen, the acronym was unknown to me, but it hád to that dog.</p>
<p>So, a relatively negative verdict?<br />
Well, re-reading the clues, I must say that there&#8217;s not much wrong with this crossword as such.<br />
I had never heard of WHIPSNADE ZOO (had to Google), but it is nicely clued. And although I am getting tired of bottomed clues, 28ac (SWEETEN) was a highlight. Also liked TANGO and had to smile at SYNCHRONISED SWIMMING (one of my first entries) as it is [only in my opinion!] a ridiculous sport.</p>
<p>Good puzzle, but (for me) a bit uneven.<br />
Some compared it to yesterday&#8217;s Puck (where I compared that one yesterday to a Paul), but I&#8217;m not sure whether Paul&#8217;s the winner.<br />
Last Saturday&#8217;s prize crossword, thát was &#8220;my&#8221; Paul.<br />
But more about that later.</p>
<p>Different strokes for different folks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143131</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi tupu

I&#039;m sorry to have seemingly ignored your comment. You&#039;re absolutely right: &#039;individual&#039; = &#039;one&#039;. 

[I thought this was a very weak clue - and not like Paul. &#039;Clutch to&#039; doesn&#039;t exist as a phrase, does it? It&#039;s surely either &#039;clutch&#039; or &#039;cling to&#039;?]

Congratulations, Davy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi tupu</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to have seemingly ignored your comment. You&#8217;re absolutely right: &#8216;individual&#8217; = &#8216;one&#8217;. </p>
<p>[I thought this was a very weak clue - and not like Paul. 'Clutch to' doesn't exist as a phrase, does it? It's surely either 'clutch' or 'cling to'?]</p>
<p>Congratulations, Davy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/15/guardian-25194-paul/#comment-143128</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=23992#comment-143128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen,

A very enjoyable puzzle from Paul and (would you believe) I&#039;ve just finished it. Despite having all the time in the world, I never seem to have time to do anything and usually finish off the puzzle after 9pm although I often fail to complete it. If I fail, I say to myself that I really didn&#039;t have enough time. It&#039;s just a defence mechanism.

Some classic Paul today with WHIPSNADE ZOO, PRICKLY ASH (apologies to Ian W) and NEWFANGLED being marvellous.
I also thought TANGO and CEASEFIRE were great. Paul is certainly out on his own when it comes to clue constructions. He is definitely the eire apparent to the great man himself (now who could that be ?).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen,</p>
<p>A very enjoyable puzzle from Paul and (would you believe) I&#8217;ve just finished it. Despite having all the time in the world, I never seem to have time to do anything and usually finish off the puzzle after 9pm although I often fail to complete it. If I fail, I say to myself that I really didn&#8217;t have enough time. It&#8217;s just a defence mechanism.</p>
<p>Some classic Paul today with WHIPSNADE ZOO, PRICKLY ASH (apologies to Ian W) and NEWFANGLED being marvellous.<br />
I also thought TANGO and CEASEFIRE were great. Paul is certainly out on his own when it comes to clue constructions. He is definitely the eire apparent to the great man himself (now who could that be ?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
