<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,572 by Mudd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:25:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/#comment-145076</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24536#comment-145076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Pete and Mudd, a very enjoyable puzzle.  My notes include the words, &#039;very subdued and straightforward for Mudd - lovely surface readings&#039;.

11 was one of my favourites.  In working it out I came across,&lt;i&gt; Notus&lt;/i&gt; (Latin) for the south wind, (&lt;i&gt;Notos&lt;/i&gt; in Greek).  A similar reference to Obama would give, not only, &#039;not US&#039;, but also, &#039;not us&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Pete and Mudd, a very enjoyable puzzle.  My notes include the words, &#8216;very subdued and straightforward for Mudd &#8211; lovely surface readings&#8217;.</p>
<p>11 was one of my favourites.  In working it out I came across,<i> Notus</i> (Latin) for the south wind, (<i>Notos</i> in Greek).  A similar reference to Obama would give, not only, &#8216;not US&#8217;, but also, &#8216;not us&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/#comment-144955</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24536#comment-144955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sil, Thanks for your corrections.  9ac was a mistake in writing up the explanation while 14ac I parsed wrongly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sil, Thanks for your corrections.  9ac was a mistake in writing up the explanation while 14ac I parsed wrongly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/#comment-144954</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24536#comment-144954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bamberger, 11d took me a good time as well.  Like you I resorted to a solver but then, for me, NOUS jumped out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bamberger, 11d took me a good time as well.  Like you I resorted to a solver but then, for me, NOUS jumped out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/#comment-144943</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24536#comment-144943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another good puzzle by Mr H.
Some really original clueing here, like in 10ac (with the &#039;amending&#039; bit), 13ac (the reversed homophone), 8d (REINDEER) and also 11d&#039;s NOUS.

Thanks, Pete, for your blog.
But I think you missed an O in 9ac (ATOM BOMB).
That O must come from &#039;old&#039;, so therefore &quot;MB (doctor) visiting A TOMB O (a grave, old)&quot; can only be seen as &quot;A TOMB O + MB&quot;, so nót an insertion of MB.

In my notes I put a question mark to 14ac (EGRESS).
I read it as EGRES (reversal of &#039;serge&#039;) + [fabric]S, but was slightly puzzled by &#039;on the way out&#039; as the definition.
EGRESS is either a verb or a noun, in which case &#039;the way out&#039; cóuld be the definition. But then, what about &#039;on&#039;?
Mudd is a very precise setter (and there is no question mark at the end of the clue, too), so I think there must be more to it.
Maybe &#039;on&#039; is part of the &quot;+S&quot; bit: EGRES with S (ultimate in fabrics) attached to it [=on]?

Apart from this an enjoyable crossword which wasn&#039;t the easiest of Mudds [which is good].]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good puzzle by Mr H.<br />
Some really original clueing here, like in 10ac (with the &#8216;amending&#8217; bit), 13ac (the reversed homophone), 8d (REINDEER) and also 11d&#8217;s NOUS.</p>
<p>Thanks, Pete, for your blog.<br />
But I think you missed an O in 9ac (ATOM BOMB).<br />
That O must come from &#8216;old&#8217;, so therefore &#8220;MB (doctor) visiting A TOMB O (a grave, old)&#8221; can only be seen as &#8220;A TOMB O + MB&#8221;, so nót an insertion of MB.</p>
<p>In my notes I put a question mark to 14ac (EGRESS).<br />
I read it as EGRES (reversal of &#8216;serge&#8217;) + [fabric]S, but was slightly puzzled by &#8216;on the way out&#8217; as the definition.<br />
EGRESS is either a verb or a noun, in which case &#8216;the way out&#8217; cóuld be the definition. But then, what about &#8216;on&#8217;?<br />
Mudd is a very precise setter (and there is no question mark at the end of the clue, too), so I think there must be more to it.<br />
Maybe &#8216;on&#8217; is part of the &#8220;+S&#8221; bit: EGRES with S (ultimate in fabrics) attached to it [=on]?</p>
<p>Apart from this an enjoyable crossword which wasn&#8217;t the easiest of Mudds [which is good].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2010/12/30/financial-times-13572-by-mudd/#comment-144934</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24536#comment-144934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failed on 11d . Stared at ?o?s for ages. Tried solvers but couldn&#039;t spot it. If &quot;nous&quot; appeared , I probably saw it as the French &quot;we&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failed on 11d . Stared at ?o?s for ages. Tried solvers but couldn&#8217;t spot it. If &#8220;nous&#8221; appeared , I probably saw it as the French &#8220;we&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
