<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,583 / Cinephile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agentzero</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145650</link>
		<dc:creator>Agentzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Gaufrid.

A thought on 16 down, which occurred to me some time after solving:  is &quot;can&#039;t have leaves&quot; meant to be read &quot;can not have leaves,&quot; i.e., &quot;is capable of not having leaves&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Gaufrid.</p>
<p>A thought on 16 down, which occurred to me some time after solving:  is &#8220;can&#8217;t have leaves&#8221; meant to be read &#8220;can not have leaves,&#8221; i.e., &#8220;is capable of not having leaves&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145642</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defeated by 19a and 24/22 where I had never encountered dele meaning abolish. While i got the answer , humpty =seat was new to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defeated by 19a and 24/22 where I had never encountered dele meaning abolish. While i got the answer , humpty =seat was new to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145619</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog and a mostly enjoyable puzzle. Re 14d, is there a kind of reflexivity in the clue? The definition, not like, is a &quot;dissimilar&quot; version of mislaid sir. The question mark at the end then becomes an indicator of something odd going on, rather than merely an anagram indicator.

I&#039;m sure I&#039;ve seen analogous clues, though I can&#039;t think of one right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog and a mostly enjoyable puzzle. Re 14d, is there a kind of reflexivity in the clue? The definition, not like, is a &#8220;dissimilar&#8221; version of mislaid sir. The question mark at the end then becomes an indicator of something odd going on, rather than merely an anagram indicator.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve seen analogous clues, though I can&#8217;t think of one right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145618</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tony
&#039;Drawing&#039; is the definition in 11dn. Think in terms of sports scores, for example &#039;one set each and three all in the third set&#039;.

As I indicated in the parsing, Ge (or Gaea/Gaia) is the goddess of Earth. The full definition in Chambers is:

&quot;In Greek mythology, the goddess or personification of Earth, mother of Uranus and (by him) of Oceanus, Cronus and the Titans.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony<br />
&#8216;Drawing&#8217; is the definition in 11dn. Think in terms of sports scores, for example &#8216;one set each and three all in the third set&#8217;.</p>
<p>As I indicated in the parsing, Ge (or Gaea/Gaia) is the goddess of Earth. The full definition in Chambers is:</p>
<p>&#8220;In Greek mythology, the goddess or personification of Earth, mother of Uranus and (by him) of Oceanus, Cronus and the Titans.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmac</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145612</link>
		<dc:creator>jmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for explaining HUMPTY, DELE, and GE which were all new to me but fortunately didn&#039;t hinder solving. I just assumed that COTTE was an alternative to cotta and am surprised that it is not in Chambers or (presumably) Collins. I did like DECIDUOUS but I wasn&#039;t thinking of our friends down under, and possibly a question mark might have helped.

I must say that I do like the Reverend&#039;s crosswords as Cinephile as they have the wit of his other persona whilst tending to avoid some of that incarnation&#039;s characteristics(long anagrams,obscure (for me) literary references, etc.), which sometimes spoil my enjoyment of those puzzles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for explaining HUMPTY, DELE, and GE which were all new to me but fortunately didn&#8217;t hinder solving. I just assumed that COTTE was an alternative to cotta and am surprised that it is not in Chambers or (presumably) Collins. I did like DECIDUOUS but I wasn&#8217;t thinking of our friends down under, and possibly a question mark might have helped.</p>
<p>I must say that I do like the Reverend&#8217;s crosswords as Cinephile as they have the wit of his other persona whilst tending to avoid some of that incarnation&#8217;s characteristics(long anagrams,obscure (for me) literary references, etc.), which sometimes spoil my enjoyment of those puzzles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145611</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finished it, but have several little quibbles. e.g. I looked up black-water to check, winc while it was fairly obvious I had not heard of the fever, and found that it is generally one word, not hyphenated.  And I agree about deciduous.  

But what about 11d?  Is &quot;drawing&quot; the definition?   If so, I don&#039;t get it.  If not, what is the word there for and where is the definition? 

Also, I don&#039;t I understand &quot;ge&quot; for earth in 21d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finished it, but have several little quibbles. e.g. I looked up black-water to check, winc while it was fairly obvious I had not heard of the fever, and found that it is generally one word, not hyphenated.  And I agree about deciduous.  </p>
<p>But what about 11d?  Is &#8220;drawing&#8221; the definition?   If so, I don&#8217;t get it.  If not, what is the word there for and where is the definition? </p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t I understand &#8220;ge&#8221; for earth in 21d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145607</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Gaufrid, it that were so (and it probably is like that), than I find this a rather thinnish anagrind.
IMO, &quot;being ...?&quot; doesn&#039;t say anything about mixing up the letters or the fact that one transforms into the other (like when setters use &quot;becoming&quot;, for example), does it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Gaufrid, it that were so (and it probably is like that), than I find this a rather thinnish anagrind.<br />
IMO, &#8220;being &#8230;?&#8221; doesn&#8217;t say anything about mixing up the letters or the fact that one transforms into the other (like when setters use &#8220;becoming&#8221;, for example), does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145602</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sil
I didn&#039;t see any double duty in 14dn. I took the &#039;being ... ?&#039; as the indicator for an anagram of the two words in-between.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sil<br />
I didn&#8217;t see any double duty in 14dn. I took the &#8216;being &#8230; ?&#8217; as the indicator for an anagram of the two words in-between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145594</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this crossword which was not too tricky.
The problem with my last entry COTTESLOE has been solved now, but I am still wondering a bit about 14d (DISSIMILAR).
Is there really an anagram indicator here?
Or is &quot;Not like&quot; doing double duty (for the anagrind, in combination with &#039;being&#039;)?
And if so, is that a valid anagram indicator?
Or does the clue as a whole suggest an anagram?
It does not feel completely right to me, but maybe it&#039;s just me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this crossword which was not too tricky.<br />
The problem with my last entry COTTESLOE has been solved now, but I am still wondering a bit about 14d (DISSIMILAR).<br />
Is there really an anagram indicator here?<br />
Or is &#8220;Not like&#8221; doing double duty (for the anagrind, in combination with &#8216;being&#8217;)?<br />
And if so, is that a valid anagram indicator?<br />
Or does the clue as a whole suggest an anagram?<br />
It does not feel completely right to me, but maybe it&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/05/financial-times-13583-cinephile/#comment-145584</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24860#comment-145584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Gaufrid

I enjoyed this even though I was unable to get COTTESLOE.

And now it&#039;s been explained ... No Wonder!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Gaufrid</p>
<p>I enjoyed this even though I was unable to get COTTESLOE.</p>
<p>And now it&#8217;s been explained &#8230; No Wonder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
