<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,578 &#8211; Dante</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/06/financial-times-13578-dante/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/06/financial-times-13578-dante/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 08:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/06/financial-times-13578-dante/#comment-145742</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24445#comment-145742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought 23 was quite OK as a double definition - &quot;Approves of indications of support&quot;.   I took &#039;approves of&#039; = favours (vb) with the second part referring to eg badges, emblems, worn to indicate support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 23 was quite OK as a double definition &#8211; &#8220;Approves of indications of support&#8221;.   I took &#8216;approves of&#8217; = favours (vb) with the second part referring to eg badges, emblems, worn to indicate support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/06/financial-times-13578-dante/#comment-145727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=24445#comment-145727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Uncle Yap.  I queried 2 clues:  I wasn&#039;t happy with &#039;flush out&#039; for scour until I checked in Chambers - there it is!  I only connected scouring to rough scrubbing.  We could have thoroughly searched the scrub. :)

I&#039;m still not happy with 23, feeling that the definitions are too similar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Uncle Yap.  I queried 2 clues:  I wasn&#8217;t happy with &#8216;flush out&#8217; for scour until I checked in Chambers &#8211; there it is!  I only connected scouring to rough scrubbing.  We could have thoroughly searched the scrub. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not happy with 23, feeling that the definitions are too similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
