<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,587 / Dante</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agentzero</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/#comment-147448</link>
		<dc:creator>Agentzero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25165#comment-147448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to everyone for the comments!

Sil, your posts are always so thoughtful and detailed.  I had a similar reaction to 4 across.  I ultimately decided I didn&#039;t mind it because you can think of OP &quot;getting&quot; C to join it in entering TRIAL (not necessarily consecutively).  I was doubtless influenced by how much I liked the surface.

Regarding 1 down, Collins gives as a definition of &quot;main&quot; &quot;a principal pipe, conduit, duct, or line in a system used to distribute water, electricity, etc.&quot;  One could argue, though, that a main (which delivers water) is distinct from a sewer (which takes it away), and that one would hope to find a rat only in the latter, and not the former.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for the comments!</p>
<p>Sil, your posts are always so thoughtful and detailed.  I had a similar reaction to 4 across.  I ultimately decided I didn&#8217;t mind it because you can think of OP &#8220;getting&#8221; C to join it in entering TRIAL (not necessarily consecutively).  I was doubtless influenced by how much I liked the surface.</p>
<p>Regarding 1 down, Collins gives as a definition of &#8220;main&#8221; &#8220;a principal pipe, conduit, duct, or line in a system used to distribute water, electricity, etc.&#8221;  One could argue, though, that a main (which delivers water) is distinct from a sewer (which takes it away), and that one would hope to find a rat only in the latter, and not the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/#comment-147434</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25165#comment-147434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more remark about TROPICAL, catalysed by dram&#039;s post.
Agentzero&#039;s explanation is, I think, &quot;OP and C in TRIAL&quot; meaning &quot;TRIAL comes around OP and C&quot;.
If so, the word &quot;getting&quot; is not really alright, as OP is not getting C (it&#039;s not OPC).
OP and C are, of course, both in TRIAL, but the word &quot;getting&quot; doesn&#039;t justify that - IMO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more remark about TROPICAL, catalysed by dram&#8217;s post.<br />
Agentzero&#8217;s explanation is, I think, &#8220;OP and C in TRIAL&#8221; meaning &#8220;TRIAL comes around OP and C&#8221;.<br />
If so, the word &#8220;getting&#8221; is not really alright, as OP is not getting C (it&#8217;s not OPC).<br />
OP and C are, of course, both in TRIAL, but the word &#8220;getting&#8221; doesn&#8217;t justify that &#8211; IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dram</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/#comment-147428</link>
		<dc:creator>dram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25165#comment-147428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Agentzero for the blog which helped this learner-lurker understand the gaps, especially TROPICAL. Thanks too to Dante for the entertainment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Agentzero for the blog which helped this learner-lurker understand the gaps, especially TROPICAL. Thanks too to Dante for the entertainment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/#comment-147423</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25165#comment-147423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like just like Jan, I had slightly more trouble with this Dante than usually.
I knew 16ac had to be PLAY ON, but I didn&#039;t fully get it.
Oh, those cd&#039;s [or is 16ac a dd?].
Another one that I found relatively late was SEWER RAT (1d): I know &quot;it&#039;s a pest&quot;, but &quot;in the main&quot;?
I think the girl&#039;s name in 23ac (philo)SOPHY is very unusual. There will surely be SOPHYs in the world, but a lot more SOPHIEs.

All this may be a matter of taste, but I put a real question mark to the use of &quot;doctor&quot; as an anagrind when it is positioned behind the fodder. I remember a similar discussion a while ago in which Dr Gaufrid raised his eyebrows, just like I did here.

Many thanks, Agentzero, for the blog which tells me that you particularly liked 4ac (TROPICAL). I do, too, but I am not quite sure whether the construction is 100% right or not.
It says: OP getting C during TRIAL.
What does &quot;getting&quot; mean here? It looks like a container indicator: TRIAL (with C in it) coming around OP.
I can&#039;t remember having seen &quot;getting&quot; being used this way.
Normally it would tell me: OP + (C in TRIAL), which is not the case here.
But, maybe it&#039;s just me who doesn&#039;t feel comfortable with it.

Finally, there are two consecutive clues in which &quot;on&quot; appears in a similar way (3d and 5d). The use of that little word in OGRE is fine (the reversal of GO &quot;on&quot; (on top of) RE), but in the next one (ROLLS UP) it is the other way around - for some people that&#039;s fine, others [like me] prefer to have AB for &quot;A on B&quot; in a down clue.

Apart from these things, a gentle start of the week (as Uncle Yap would call it).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like just like Jan, I had slightly more trouble with this Dante than usually.<br />
I knew 16ac had to be PLAY ON, but I didn&#8217;t fully get it.<br />
Oh, those cd&#8217;s [or is 16ac a dd?].<br />
Another one that I found relatively late was SEWER RAT (1d): I know &#8220;it&#8217;s a pest&#8221;, but &#8220;in the main&#8221;?<br />
I think the girl&#8217;s name in 23ac (philo)SOPHY is very unusual. There will surely be SOPHYs in the world, but a lot more SOPHIEs.</p>
<p>All this may be a matter of taste, but I put a real question mark to the use of &#8220;doctor&#8221; as an anagrind when it is positioned behind the fodder. I remember a similar discussion a while ago in which Dr Gaufrid raised his eyebrows, just like I did here.</p>
<p>Many thanks, Agentzero, for the blog which tells me that you particularly liked 4ac (TROPICAL). I do, too, but I am not quite sure whether the construction is 100% right or not.<br />
It says: OP getting C during TRIAL.<br />
What does &#8220;getting&#8221; mean here? It looks like a container indicator: TRIAL (with C in it) coming around OP.<br />
I can&#8217;t remember having seen &#8220;getting&#8221; being used this way.<br />
Normally it would tell me: OP + (C in TRIAL), which is not the case here.<br />
But, maybe it&#8217;s just me who doesn&#8217;t feel comfortable with it.</p>
<p>Finally, there are two consecutive clues in which &#8220;on&#8221; appears in a similar way (3d and 5d). The use of that little word in OGRE is fine (the reversal of GO &#8220;on&#8221; (on top of) RE), but in the next one (ROLLS UP) it is the other way around &#8211; for some people that&#8217;s fine, others [like me] prefer to have AB for &#8220;A on B&#8221; in a down clue.</p>
<p>Apart from these things, a gentle start of the week (as Uncle Yap would call it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/#comment-147375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25165#comment-147375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Agentzero.  I always read the FT and Guardian blogs but am usually too late to add a comment.  I rarely do the puzzles on the days they appear so I&#039;m only ever ready for the prize blogs.

I struggled to finish this puzzle - I&#039;m not a fan of double definitions and a couple of cryptic definitions left me cold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Agentzero.  I always read the FT and Guardian blogs but am usually too late to add a comment.  I rarely do the puzzles on the days they appear so I&#8217;m only ever ready for the prize blogs.</p>
<p>I struggled to finish this puzzle &#8211; I&#8217;m not a fan of double definitions and a couple of cryptic definitions left me cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Yap</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/20/financial-times-13587-dante/#comment-147372</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Yap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25165#comment-147372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome AgentZero to the Lonely Planet. The trouble with prize puzzle is that most solvers would have forgotten ten days later. However, there are some learner-lurkers here who use this relatively simple puzzle as a weekly lesson. Do not be discouraged ... your effort is being appreciated, albeit silently]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome AgentZero to the Lonely Planet. The trouble with prize puzzle is that most solvers would have forgotten ten days later. However, there are some learner-lurkers here who use this relatively simple puzzle as a weekly lesson. Do not be discouraged &#8230; your effort is being appreciated, albeit silently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
