<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,225 &#8211; Chifonie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147784</link>
		<dc:creator>ernie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Andrew and Chifonie. Nice to get one finished: doesn&#039;t often happen. Agree with all the comments about possibly obscure abbreviations. As a chemist (not pharmacist), I have seen many Winchester bottles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Andrew and Chifonie. Nice to get one finished: doesn&#8217;t often happen. Agree with all the comments about possibly obscure abbreviations. As a chemist (not pharmacist), I have seen many Winchester bottles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147630</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post #15, that is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post #15, that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147629</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friendly crossword from Chifonie whose trademark is surely the efficient (and usually elegant) use of a limited number of cryptic devices.

While my PinC and I were still talking about work, she ticked off 20d:
&quot;Dosage ordered for mariner (3,3)&quot;.
After I woke up, I said: &quot;SAD EGO?&quot; :)
&quot;No&quot;. &quot;What about SEA GOD?&quot;. &quot;No&quot;. &quot;Ah! SEA DOG&quot;.

The only clue we didn&#039;t fully understand was 24d (LEAR). 
We were too much focused on Sovereign = King = Lear.
But thanks, Andrew, for explaining.

We enjoyed the crossword, even though it wasn&#039;t too taxing.
Just generally well written (as ever with this setter).
The only thing I did not like was the use of &quot;from&quot;, even twice (in 3d and 5d). 
As one might know by now, I am very sensitive to linking words, especially when they&#039;re not right (that is, IMHO).
Look at 3d, and the clue tells us that &quot;WINE+R around CHEST&quot; is something that we get from &quot;bottle&quot;. I think from a construction POV it is the other way around. Similarly in 5d&#039;s PURLOINER.
But maybe it&#039;s just nit-picking.

As to &quot;in Africa&quot; for the definition of MALAWI, I can only say: Araucaria does it all the time.
Oh, and I almost forgot: There&#039;s &quot;large&quot; in the clue for LARGO (23d) - that&#039;s not very good, is it?
But you can&#039;t have it all.

On the other hand, the clue for the very (too?) easy SOCRATES (7d) is extremely neat.
Nice crossword.

Finally, if Gaufrid allows me to do that [but I think he will], I would like to take the opportunity to invite anyone who&#039;s interested to have a go at my own little crossword. More details at General Discussion, post #14.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friendly crossword from Chifonie whose trademark is surely the efficient (and usually elegant) use of a limited number of cryptic devices.</p>
<p>While my PinC and I were still talking about work, she ticked off 20d:<br />
&#8220;Dosage ordered for mariner (3,3)&#8221;.<br />
After I woke up, I said: &#8220;SAD EGO?&#8221; <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
&#8220;No&#8221;. &#8220;What about SEA GOD?&#8221;. &#8220;No&#8221;. &#8220;Ah! SEA DOG&#8221;.</p>
<p>The only clue we didn&#8217;t fully understand was 24d (LEAR).<br />
We were too much focused on Sovereign = King = Lear.<br />
But thanks, Andrew, for explaining.</p>
<p>We enjoyed the crossword, even though it wasn&#8217;t too taxing.<br />
Just generally well written (as ever with this setter).<br />
The only thing I did not like was the use of &#8220;from&#8221;, even twice (in 3d and 5d).<br />
As one might know by now, I am very sensitive to linking words, especially when they&#8217;re not right (that is, IMHO).<br />
Look at 3d, and the clue tells us that &#8220;WINE+R around CHEST&#8221; is something that we get from &#8220;bottle&#8221;. I think from a construction POV it is the other way around. Similarly in 5d&#8217;s PURLOINER.<br />
But maybe it&#8217;s just nit-picking.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;in Africa&#8221; for the definition of MALAWI, I can only say: Araucaria does it all the time.<br />
Oh, and I almost forgot: There&#8217;s &#8220;large&#8221; in the clue for LARGO (23d) &#8211; that&#8217;s not very good, is it?<br />
But you can&#8217;t have it all.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the clue for the very (too?) easy SOCRATES (7d) is extremely neat.<br />
Nice crossword.</p>
<p>Finally, if Gaufrid allows me to do that [but I think he will], I would like to take the opportunity to invite anyone who&#8217;s interested to have a go at my own little crossword. More details at General Discussion, post #14.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gm4hqf</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147628</link>
		<dc:creator>gm4hqf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andrew

Not too difficult a puzzle. Isn&#039;t it amazing that over the last 55 or more years of doing crosswords, I never knew that a Winchester was a bottle.

Got to learn something new every day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew</p>
<p>Not too difficult a puzzle. Isn&#8217;t it amazing that over the last 55 or more years of doing crosswords, I never knew that a Winchester was a bottle.</p>
<p>Got to learn something new every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147619</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Andrew, an agreeable solve today I thought although wasn&#039;t that keen on &#039;weak&#039; = &#039;bad&#039; (10a). 
How about &lt;i&gt;Cleaner hides joint in rimless knickers&lt;/i&gt; for 5d ? (Involves a step too far maybe but would make me smile :) )
Liked the juxtaposition of 12/11 and 16/1d among others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew, an agreeable solve today I thought although wasn&#8217;t that keen on &#8216;weak&#8217; = &#8216;bad&#8217; (10a).<br />
How about <i>Cleaner hides joint in rimless knickers</i> for 5d ? (Involves a step too far maybe but would make me smile <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )<br />
Liked the juxtaposition of 12/11 and 16/1d among others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147618</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martin

Me neither! :) I just liked the quotation!

My comments are mainly based on OED and Chambers. As far as I can tell from them, river comes most directly from Anglo-Norman and the terms there derive from riparius/a and relate to riviere (fr) and riviera (It).

I suspect we&#039;ve exhausted this one and each other! Too many &#039;nits&#039; for one day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin</p>
<p>Me neither! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I just liked the quotation!</p>
<p>My comments are mainly based on OED and Chambers. As far as I can tell from them, river comes most directly from Anglo-Norman and the terms there derive from riparius/a and relate to riviere (fr) and riviera (It).</p>
<p>I suspect we&#8217;ve exhausted this one and each other! Too many &#8216;nits&#8217; for one day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Aubrey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Aubrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Managed to hold myself up unnecessarily by being convinced that  &quot;case&quot; meant that 3 down must be &quot;salmanazar&quot; (12 bottle bottle). Just shows how my mind runs, I guess..... Now where did I leave the cork screw?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Managed to hold myself up unnecessarily by being convinced that  &#8220;case&#8221; meant that 3 down must be &#8220;salmanazar&#8221; (12 bottle bottle). Just shows how my mind runs, I guess&#8230;.. Now where did I leave the cork screw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147615</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi again tupu - there are all sorts of ways for words to pass from one language to another. Couldn&#039;t the derivation be simply phonic - ripa/river? Even if a river is a river because it is something with a bank, I don&#039;t think that legitimises sticking -er on bank to make &#039;river&#039;. It just might if &#039;rive&#039; had come down as an alternative to &#039;bank&#039;, but it didn&#039;t. But I&#039;m not a philologist, and don&#039;t want to get out of my depth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again tupu &#8211; there are all sorts of ways for words to pass from one language to another. Couldn&#8217;t the derivation be simply phonic &#8211; ripa/river? Even if a river is a river because it is something with a bank, I don&#8217;t think that legitimises sticking -er on bank to make &#8216;river&#8217;. It just might if &#8216;rive&#8217; had come down as an alternative to &#8216;bank&#8217;, but it didn&#8217;t. But I&#8217;m not a philologist, and don&#8217;t want to get out of my depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147613</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Martin

But what about the fact that &#039;river&#039; apparently = of a bank? There is no verb associated with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin</p>
<p>But what about the fact that &#8216;river&#8217; apparently = of a bank? There is no verb associated with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/01/21/guardian-25225-chifonie/#comment-147610</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=25463#comment-147610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi tupu - I&#039;m not convinced that &#039;of a bank&#039; translates comfortably into &#039;banker&#039;.

Both &#039;header&#039; and &#039;winger&#039; are constructed from actions rather than attributes, directly in the former case and indirectly in the latter, via &#039;play on the wing&#039;; so not a model for &#039;banker&#039;, which might rather be analogous to calling a motorway a &#039;verger&#039;. The indirect formulation from an action could prove fruitful for setters though, perhaps enabling, for instance, Dracula to be called a &#039;caper&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi tupu &#8211; I&#8217;m not convinced that &#8216;of a bank&#8217; translates comfortably into &#8216;banker&#8217;.</p>
<p>Both &#8216;header&#8217; and &#8216;winger&#8217; are constructed from actions rather than attributes, directly in the former case and indirectly in the latter, via &#8216;play on the wing&#8217;; so not a model for &#8216;banker&#8217;, which might rather be analogous to calling a motorway a &#8216;verger&#8217;. The indirect formulation from an action could prove fruitful for setters though, perhaps enabling, for instance, Dracula to be called a &#8216;caper&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
