<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic 586 / Beale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:53:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaise</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149891</link>
		<dc:creator>blaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top marks to Big Dave for the elegance of his explanations. I&#039;d definitely recommend this blog to people getting started with cryptics!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top marks to Big Dave for the elegance of his explanations. I&#8217;d definitely recommend this blog to people getting started with cryptics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149738</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A better crossword maybe, but not a wonderful Quiptic. Definitely harder than Rufus.

As noted 9 was ambiguous and elsewhere the indirections won&#039;t have helped the beginners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better crossword maybe, but not a wonderful Quiptic. Definitely harder than Rufus.</p>
<p>As noted 9 was ambiguous and elsewhere the indirections won&#8217;t have helped the beginners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterO</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149730</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog,Big Dave. I agree with Tokyocolin that the across clues make it seem more difficult than it turnrd out to be. For 16A I needed all the checked letters, and then my first thought was SHELLSHOCK. Well, it fits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog,Big Dave. I agree with Tokyocolin that the across clues make it seem more difficult than it turnrd out to be. For 16A I needed all the checked letters, and then my first thought was SHELLSHOCK. Well, it fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angstony</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149727</link>
		<dc:creator>Angstony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think it was too hard for a Quiptic. But as others have mentioned, today&#039;s Rufus was certainly much easier. One wonders whether the editor maybe got the two mixed up.

My only complaint with this one would be the use of &quot;setback&quot; in 20dn, as &quot;_back_&quot; reversal indicators seem as inappropriate to me in down clues, as &quot;_up_&quot; reversal indicators are in across clues. But I&#039;m just a beginner so what do I know?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it was too hard for a Quiptic. But as others have mentioned, today&#8217;s Rufus was certainly much easier. One wonders whether the editor maybe got the two mixed up.</p>
<p>My only complaint with this one would be the use of &#8220;setback&#8221; in 20dn, as &#8220;_back_&#8221; reversal indicators seem as inappropriate to me in down clues, as &#8220;_up_&#8221; reversal indicators are in across clues. But I&#8217;m just a beginner so what do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tokyocolin</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149721</link>
		<dc:creator>Tokyocolin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Big Dave. This was a tale of two halves for me. As usual I attempted all the Across clues first from which I managed about 3 answers and was convinced this was a stinker and absurdly difficult for a Quiptic. But even with very few crossing letters I solved every Down clue first up and then went back to complete the Acrosses without difficulty. So all done in under 15 mins. 

I am curious if anyone else found the Across clues much harder than the Downs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Big Dave. This was a tale of two halves for me. As usual I attempted all the Across clues first from which I managed about 3 answers and was convinced this was a stinker and absurdly difficult for a Quiptic. But even with very few crossing letters I solved every Down clue first up and then went back to complete the Acrosses without difficulty. So all done in under 15 mins. </p>
<p>I am curious if anyone else found the Across clues much harder than the Downs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149715</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Beale for an enjoyable puzzle; better than the Cryptic today. Thanks also to Big Dave for his good blog.

Was I the only one to put in SPEEDCHECK for 16a before correcting to SPELLCHECK? The former just about parses also with the clue, although maybe a speed check on a computer is not exactly a program.

I, of course, put in &#039;goodbye&#039; for 9 at first until the crossing letters did not agree. I liked some of these clues, particularly 2 and 22. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Beale for an enjoyable puzzle; better than the Cryptic today. Thanks also to Big Dave for his good blog.</p>
<p>Was I the only one to put in SPEEDCHECK for 16a before correcting to SPELLCHECK? The former just about parses also with the clue, although maybe a speed check on a computer is not exactly a program.</p>
<p>I, of course, put in &#8216;goodbye&#8217; for 9 at first until the crossing letters did not agree. I liked some of these clues, particularly 2 and 22. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149713</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Big Dave.  I did enjoy this one, but agree with you that it&#039;s at the hard end of the Quiptic scale.  But it&#039;s all fairly clued, there are no overelaborate constructions, and apart from (for me) TRANSOM, no unusual words (and that was a clear anagram, so fair play).

I think GRIMACE is as you describe it - GRIM + ACE; I quite liked it.  Other clues that hit the spot today were COCKTAILS and EGRET.

I&#039;ll contradict myself by saying that in fact perhaps 17dn is a bit elaborate; and for me, HIPPEST doesn&#039;t mean &#039;most current&#039;.  I would say it meant &#039;most popular&#039;.  The Conservative-led coalition is the current government, but it&#039;s not necessarily popular.  Especially if you have a daughter called Kathryn who&#039;s paying student fees.

Whatever, thanks to Beale for a soundly-clued and pleasing puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Big Dave.  I did enjoy this one, but agree with you that it&#8217;s at the hard end of the Quiptic scale.  But it&#8217;s all fairly clued, there are no overelaborate constructions, and apart from (for me) TRANSOM, no unusual words (and that was a clear anagram, so fair play).</p>
<p>I think GRIMACE is as you describe it &#8211; GRIM + ACE; I quite liked it.  Other clues that hit the spot today were COCKTAILS and EGRET.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll contradict myself by saying that in fact perhaps 17dn is a bit elaborate; and for me, HIPPEST doesn&#8217;t mean &#8216;most current&#8217;.  I would say it meant &#8216;most popular&#8217;.  The Conservative-led coalition is the current government, but it&#8217;s not necessarily popular.  Especially if you have a daughter called Kathryn who&#8217;s paying student fees.</p>
<p>Whatever, thanks to Beale for a soundly-clued and pleasing puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crypticsue</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149710</link>
		<dc:creator>crypticsue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second week running that the Quiptic has been, IMHO, a little harder than the earlier puzzles.    However, it was enjoyable.  Thanks Beale and BD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second week running that the Quiptic has been, IMHO, a little harder than the earlier puzzles.    However, it was enjoyable.  Thanks Beale and BD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pommers</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/07/guardian-quiptic-586-beale/#comment-149701</link>
		<dc:creator>pommers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26217#comment-149701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi there BD

Agree it&#039;s a little harder than normal for a Quiptic and I have to admit defeat! Just couldn&#039;t see 16a even with all the checking letters - Doh! A senior moment or some such!

I actually found the Rufus easier than this one.

Enjoyed the puzzle so thanks to Beale (a new setter for me) and to you for the review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there BD</p>
<p>Agree it&#8217;s a little harder than normal for a Quiptic and I have to admit defeat! Just couldn&#8217;t see 16a even with all the checking letters &#8211; Doh! A senior moment or some such!</p>
<p>I actually found the Rufus easier than this one.</p>
<p>Enjoyed the puzzle so thanks to Beale (a new setter for me) and to you for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
