<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,614 / Sleuth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/#comment-150112</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26333#comment-150112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks smiffy.
 A very good but difficult puzzle.As you say a lot of famous names featured,so a bit of general knowledge was required.Maybe some of the clues were a bit vague - actor,composer,novelist,writer - but I think the definitions were clear enough to compensate.
Struggled with 11 across by trying to fit S or N in there,don&#039;t think I&#039;ve come across the po abbreviation before,made a nice change.
FLAUBERT was brilliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks smiffy.<br />
 A very good but difficult puzzle.As you say a lot of famous names featured,so a bit of general knowledge was required.Maybe some of the clues were a bit vague &#8211; actor,composer,novelist,writer &#8211; but I think the definitions were clear enough to compensate.<br />
Struggled with 11 across by trying to fit S or N in there,don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve come across the po abbreviation before,made a nice change.<br />
FLAUBERT was brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/#comment-150086</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26333#comment-150086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re. FLAUBERT, I think that was my favorite clue!  Though I did not get it until I had most of the cross letters.  Interestingly, the one I did not have was FOSTER.  Sleuth could have perhaps made it a bit easier by saying &quot;French writer&quot; in 1d in the same way as he said &quot;English writer&quot; in 1a.  Since one&#039;s natural assumption would be English it seems odd to mention the nationality when it is the &quot;default&quot; but not when it isn&#039;t!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. FLAUBERT, I think that was my favorite clue!  Though I did not get it until I had most of the cross letters.  Interestingly, the one I did not have was FOSTER.  Sleuth could have perhaps made it a bit easier by saying &#8220;French writer&#8221; in 1d in the same way as he said &#8220;English writer&#8221; in 1a.  Since one&#8217;s natural assumption would be English it seems odd to mention the nationality when it is the &#8220;default&#8221; but not when it isn&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Welsh</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/#comment-150085</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26333#comment-150085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finished it all bar one, STIR.  Should have got this.  Didn&#039;t understand 11a wordplay and still don&#039;t.  I guess BUM is POOR, but is PO an accepted abbreviation of POLE?  

Got stuck on 6d thinking the composer had to be BACH, until I got CYPERCAFEand all was clear.  Got 18d without understanding why.  Never heard of Anthony Sher I am afraid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finished it all bar one, STIR.  Should have got this.  Didn&#8217;t understand 11a wordplay and still don&#8217;t.  I guess BUM is POOR, but is PO an accepted abbreviation of POLE?  </p>
<p>Got stuck on 6d thinking the composer had to be BACH, until I got CYPERCAFEand all was clear.  Got 18d without understanding why.  Never heard of Anthony Sher I am afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/#comment-150083</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26333#comment-150083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Smiffy.
Had a two hour train journey to try to unpick this and got about half way through.

Would never have got Flaubert.

Not happy about 18d -never heard of Sher but even if I had, actor hardly gives much of a hint.

10a I toyed with boardwalk until 10d scuppered that. Then thought about coastline until 7d scotched that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Smiffy.<br />
Had a two hour train journey to try to unpick this and got about half way through.</p>
<p>Would never have got Flaubert.</p>
<p>Not happy about 18d -never heard of Sher but even if I had, actor hardly gives much of a hint.</p>
<p>10a I toyed with boardwalk until 10d scuppered that. Then thought about coastline until 7d scotched that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nestorius</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/10/financial-times-13614-sleuth/#comment-150067</link>
		<dc:creator>Nestorius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26333#comment-150067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not &lt;em&gt;fiendishly&lt;/em&gt; difficult but plenty to chew over.  Not a quickie.

It did help once I spotted the setter&#039;s predilection for cultural references.

I particularly liked 20 down with the fine misdirection of &quot;one inside&quot;, 23d with nice smooth surface.

Thanks to Sleuth &amp; smiffy for the fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not <em>fiendishly</em> difficult but plenty to chew over.  Not a quickie.</p>
<p>It did help once I spotted the setter&#8217;s predilection for cultural references.</p>
<p>I particularly liked 20 down with the fine misdirection of &#8220;one inside&#8221;, 23d with nice smooth surface.</p>
<p>Thanks to Sleuth &amp; smiffy for the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
