<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,627 / Alberich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-152107</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-152107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi bamberger

Alberich is at the hard end of the spectrum for me too. As Gaufrid says getting to understand his style makes a big difference.

About 3d: &quot;receives A&quot; is to put A between COLOR and DO. I had missed that in my original post and Eileen pointed it out. Have fixed it since then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi bamberger</p>
<p>Alberich is at the hard end of the spectrum for me too. As Gaufrid says getting to understand his style makes a big difference.</p>
<p>About 3d: &#8220;receives A&#8221; is to put A between COLOR and DO. I had missed that in my original post and Eileen pointed it out. Have fixed it since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-152093</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-152093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks shuchi.
  Alberich is one of my favourite setters and this puzzle didn&#039;t let me down at all.I fairly sailed through most of the right hand side of the puzzle but then ran out of steam and had to work hard for the rest.
The surfaces were as smooth and misleading as ever.I don&#039;t often notice the surface reading of clues as I tend to deconstruct the clue as I am reading it,so Alberich&#039;s must be pretty good for me to notice.
Top clues for me 25 across and the marvellous 21 down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks shuchi.<br />
  Alberich is one of my favourite setters and this puzzle didn&#8217;t let me down at all.I fairly sailed through most of the right hand side of the puzzle but then ran out of steam and had to work hard for the rest.<br />
The surfaces were as smooth and misleading as ever.I don&#8217;t often notice the surface reading of clues as I tend to deconstruct the clue as I am reading it,so Alberich&#8217;s must be pretty good for me to notice.<br />
Top clues for me 25 across and the marvellous 21 down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-152053</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-152053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen. &quot;A&quot; added to 3dn.

@Sil van den Hoek: I couldn&#039;t see &quot;OWER = one who’s not settled&quot; either till it was explained in the comments; I should expand its explanation in the blog. As you say, the &quot;?&quot; must be there to indicate that &#039;ower&#039; is not really [really not? :)] a word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen. &#8220;A&#8221; added to 3dn.</p>
<p>@Sil van den Hoek: I couldn&#8217;t see &#8220;OWER = one who’s not settled&#8221; either till it was explained in the comments; I should expand its explanation in the blog. As you say, the &#8220;?&#8221; must be there to indicate that &#8216;ower&#8217; is not really [really not? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ] a word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-152049</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-152049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi bamberger
Alberich/Klingsor is a setter, like Anax/Loroso, whose style you must become accustomed to in order to see through the clues. Keep trying and you will get there in the end. 

Regarding your specific questions, in 3dn I think &#039;receive a&#039; is just a link and it is suspension=springs (as in a car).

In 8d, Dis is another name for Pluto, the Greek god of the underworld.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi bamberger<br />
Alberich/Klingsor is a setter, like Anax/Loroso, whose style you must become accustomed to in order to see through the clues. Keep trying and you will get there in the end. </p>
<p>Regarding your specific questions, in 3dn I think &#8216;receive a&#8217; is just a link and it is suspension=springs (as in a car).</p>
<p>In 8d, Dis is another name for Pluto, the Greek god of the underworld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-152046</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-152046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this the hardest FT puzzle I&#039;ve encountered since starting about six months ago. 3 passes and 25 minutes yielded no answers and I thought it was going to be the solvers equivalent of the whitewash/double bagel.
Eventually I spotted the hidden word at 20d, then got the anagram at 24a &amp; the only other one I got was 9d. Talk about not being on the setters wavelength, I wasn&#039;t in the same universe. 
I still don&#039;t understand parts of 3d &amp; 8d and would be grateful for being put out of my misery.

1a All I could think of was that I was looking for something to do with a law concerning a street
5a Was a bit surprised to see &quot;bum&quot; in the FT -isn&#039;t it a vulgar Americanism? Anyway I assumed I was looking for another word for a layabout.
10a I didn&#039;t make the association of Winchester with gun-all I could think of was the public school.
11a Thought of enormous and ginormous. Never occured to me that note was &quot;n&quot; was thinking of doh, ray etc 
12a Had this the wrong way round and was looking for potless, bankrupt etc 
13a Never heard of this
22a I wouldn&#039;t have seen ower=one who has not paid up
26a Couldn&#039;t get 100=ton out of my mind 
27a I had tm but then tried the even and odd letters of hospital which doesn&#039;t work 
28a I think if you had given me the answer and asked me to explain it, you&#039;d still be waiting.
And so to the downs
1d I was looking for a game to remove r from but I was looking for a word meaning neutral or landlocked or mountaineous.
2d I did get as far as ex e mp but that was it. 
3d I still can&#039;t see why springs=receives a suspension. 
6d I tried every way of writing the letters out in the hope that something would leap out at me but it didn&#039;t.
8d I don&#039;t understand dis=underworld boss. 
23d Very good clue but too hard for me.

One day, perhaps.

Well done anyone who solved  that -I&#039;m envious and impressed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this the hardest FT puzzle I&#8217;ve encountered since starting about six months ago. 3 passes and 25 minutes yielded no answers and I thought it was going to be the solvers equivalent of the whitewash/double bagel.<br />
Eventually I spotted the hidden word at 20d, then got the anagram at 24a &amp; the only other one I got was 9d. Talk about not being on the setters wavelength, I wasn&#8217;t in the same universe.<br />
I still don&#8217;t understand parts of 3d &amp; 8d and would be grateful for being put out of my misery.</p>
<p>1a All I could think of was that I was looking for something to do with a law concerning a street<br />
5a Was a bit surprised to see &#8220;bum&#8221; in the FT -isn&#8217;t it a vulgar Americanism? Anyway I assumed I was looking for another word for a layabout.<br />
10a I didn&#8217;t make the association of Winchester with gun-all I could think of was the public school.<br />
11a Thought of enormous and ginormous. Never occured to me that note was &#8220;n&#8221; was thinking of doh, ray etc<br />
12a Had this the wrong way round and was looking for potless, bankrupt etc<br />
13a Never heard of this<br />
22a I wouldn&#8217;t have seen ower=one who has not paid up<br />
26a Couldn&#8217;t get 100=ton out of my mind<br />
27a I had tm but then tried the even and odd letters of hospital which doesn&#8217;t work<br />
28a I think if you had given me the answer and asked me to explain it, you&#8217;d still be waiting.<br />
And so to the downs<br />
1d I was looking for a game to remove r from but I was looking for a word meaning neutral or landlocked or mountaineous.<br />
2d I did get as far as ex e mp but that was it.<br />
3d I still can&#8217;t see why springs=receives a suspension.<br />
6d I tried every way of writing the letters out in the hope that something would leap out at me but it didn&#8217;t.<br />
8d I don&#8217;t understand dis=underworld boss.<br />
23d Very good clue but too hard for me.</p>
<p>One day, perhaps.</p>
<p>Well done anyone who solved  that -I&#8217;m envious and impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-151998</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-151998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, shuchi.

This was the puzzle I went to bed with last night, just to have a first look at it.
I was so taken by it and it went so well that in fact I almost finished it before I closed my eyes.
Just had to check a few answers this morning, like RAP SHEET (28ac) and also COWER (22ac) which I still couldn&#039;t parse before I saw Rishi explanation. The &quot;?&quot; in the clue is there to indicate that &#039;ower&#039; is not a word that&#039;s in the dictionary, but more a playful allusion, I guess?

Brilliant crossword, splendid surfaces, ingenious constructions.

As some people might know by now, I feel great affinity with Alberich&#039;s style of clueing, and maybe that&#039;s why I went so smoothly through this puzzle. I knew (almost) exactly what to look for and where. Downside of it all: I didn&#039;t pay much attention to the neatness of the surfaces (I dó find them important, though) while solving. The admiration came later.

I find it very hard to single out any clues as possible highlights, but if I&#039;ll have to ... er, I don&#039;t really know [or should I say: I really don&#039;t know?].
Great stuff all the way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, shuchi.</p>
<p>This was the puzzle I went to bed with last night, just to have a first look at it.<br />
I was so taken by it and it went so well that in fact I almost finished it before I closed my eyes.<br />
Just had to check a few answers this morning, like RAP SHEET (28ac) and also COWER (22ac) which I still couldn&#8217;t parse before I saw Rishi explanation. The &#8220;?&#8221; in the clue is there to indicate that &#8216;ower&#8217; is not a word that&#8217;s in the dictionary, but more a playful allusion, I guess?</p>
<p>Brilliant crossword, splendid surfaces, ingenious constructions.</p>
<p>As some people might know by now, I feel great affinity with Alberich&#8217;s style of clueing, and maybe that&#8217;s why I went so smoothly through this puzzle. I knew (almost) exactly what to look for and where. Downside of it all: I didn&#8217;t pay much attention to the neatness of the surfaces (I dó find them important, though) while solving. The admiration came later.</p>
<p>I find it very hard to single out any clues as possible highlights, but if I&#8217;ll have to &#8230; er, I don&#8217;t really know [or should I say: I really don't know?].<br />
Great stuff all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-151994</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-151994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi shuchi

Lovely blog, lovely puzzle, as ever from Alberich.

As you say, hard to pick out favourites but, if pushed, I&#039;d choose 24 and 25ac and 3, 16, 20 and 23dn. Some super surfaces!

[There&#039;s an A missing in your blog of 3dn.]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi shuchi</p>
<p>Lovely blog, lovely puzzle, as ever from Alberich.</p>
<p>As you say, hard to pick out favourites but, if pushed, I&#8217;d choose 24 and 25ac and 3, 16, 20 and 23dn. Some super surfaces!</p>
<p>[There's an A missing in your blog of 3dn.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-151990</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-151990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, that way &quot;settled&quot;! Thanks Rishi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that way &#8220;settled&#8221;! Thanks Rishi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/financial-times-13627-alberich/#comment-151989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26902#comment-151989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[22a: C + OWER (one who owes money)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22a: C + OWER (one who owes money)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
