<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,255 / Bonxie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dix</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finished this last night after starting earlier in the evening and not getting very far at first. 

Found it quite hard but fair - a bit like Paul, though not in the same way. I was able to parse everything - which is always nice :-)

Hadn&#039;t heard of 6D, though worked it out from the word play. 

Hadn&#039;t heard of 1D either - I jokingly suggested peanut as the only thing which fitted the second word, then realised it&#039;s an anagram and found it must be peanut!

Got medallions but couldn&#039;t see why they are cuts until I googled.

Last to fill in was 3D - a flower which is not a river!

Enjoyed it, though the Thesaurus-like definitions I found a bit stretched at times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finished this last night after starting earlier in the evening and not getting very far at first. </p>
<p>Found it quite hard but fair &#8211; a bit like Paul, though not in the same way. I was able to parse everything &#8211; which is always nice <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hadn&#8217;t heard of 6D, though worked it out from the word play. </p>
<p>Hadn&#8217;t heard of 1D either &#8211; I jokingly suggested peanut as the only thing which fitted the second word, then realised it&#8217;s an anagram and found it must be peanut!</p>
<p>Got medallions but couldn&#8217;t see why they are cuts until I googled.</p>
<p>Last to fill in was 3D &#8211; a flower which is not a river!</p>
<p>Enjoyed it, though the Thesaurus-like definitions I found a bit stretched at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152297</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 01:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leroy, that&#039;s a very interesting way to make &quot;hernia&quot; work, and it makes sense.  I was comfortable with it as a simple (?) anagrind, in that a hernia is also commonly called a &quot;rupture&quot;.

This was a brutally enjoyable puzzle - I spent some time with it 2/25 evening and left with nothing more than ALIAS in ink and ANON in pencil next to the clue.  Worked on it 2/26 and got most of the bottom half, though with some penciled answers (and a lot of research, follow my edit pattern on Wikipedia!).  Today I was grim.  The top and bottom are only connected by two words - the two 15 letter phrases, which I didn&#039;t have yet, and the only word placed in the top was still ALIAS.

I had noted, though, that no matter how hard a clue was to solve, they all parsed well in the end, so I kept slogging away.  When ANYTIME popped I was embarrassed not to be looking for hidden words... but it dragged me slowly towards the PEANUT (aka popcorn) and I just kept banging away.

I&#039;ve seen CERT before, but it didn&#039;t click, so I was one more CONSENTer.  Which would have worked if the clue was &quot;agreement to swindle the raptured&quot;...

As far as a theme, while there really isn&#039;t one, the puzzle is very &quot;themey&quot; - the cuts, the packing material and fabric, the food items (one in each corner), several legal-ish terms, RANDOM CHANCE, and any I missed?

So thanks for (too) many hours of entertainment, Bonxie, and the explanations for a few I didn&#039;t understand, Eileen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leroy, that&#8217;s a very interesting way to make &#8220;hernia&#8221; work, and it makes sense.  I was comfortable with it as a simple (?) anagrind, in that a hernia is also commonly called a &#8220;rupture&#8221;.</p>
<p>This was a brutally enjoyable puzzle &#8211; I spent some time with it 2/25 evening and left with nothing more than ALIAS in ink and ANON in pencil next to the clue.  Worked on it 2/26 and got most of the bottom half, though with some penciled answers (and a lot of research, follow my edit pattern on Wikipedia!).  Today I was grim.  The top and bottom are only connected by two words &#8211; the two 15 letter phrases, which I didn&#8217;t have yet, and the only word placed in the top was still ALIAS.</p>
<p>I had noted, though, that no matter how hard a clue was to solve, they all parsed well in the end, so I kept slogging away.  When ANYTIME popped I was embarrassed not to be looking for hidden words&#8230; but it dragged me slowly towards the PEANUT (aka popcorn) and I just kept banging away.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen CERT before, but it didn&#8217;t click, so I was one more CONSENTer.  Which would have worked if the clue was &#8220;agreement to swindle the raptured&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>As far as a theme, while there really isn&#8217;t one, the puzzle is very &#8220;themey&#8221; &#8211; the cuts, the packing material and fabric, the food items (one in each corner), several legal-ish terms, RANDOM CHANCE, and any I missed?</p>
<p>So thanks for (too) many hours of entertainment, Bonxie, and the explanations for a few I didn&#8217;t understand, Eileen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152269</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather late in the day, but thanks to Gaufrid and Eileen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather late in the day, but thanks to Gaufrid and Eileen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152188</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 22:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got it now. {Perfunctory = token ... &amp; ... clue = indication = token}. Thanks both of you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it now. {Perfunctory = token &#8230; &amp; &#8230; clue = indication = token}. Thanks both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152186</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Robi and Roger

Apologies for any vagueness - and thanks, Gaufrid.

My reading was: 

a: noun: &#039;indication&#039;, as in &#039;a token of my affection&#039;
b: adjective [Chambers]: &#039;serving as a symbol; done or given as a token and therefeore of no real value, nominal&#039;
 - as in &#039;token woman&#039;!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robi and Roger</p>
<p>Apologies for any vagueness &#8211; and thanks, Gaufrid.</p>
<p>My reading was: </p>
<p>a: noun: &#8216;indication&#8217;, as in &#8216;a token of my affection&#8217;<br />
b: adjective [Chambers]: &#8216;serving as a symbol; done or given as a token and therefeore of no real value, nominal&#8217;<br />
 &#8211; as in &#8216;token woman&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152182</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robi &amp; Roger
You need to think of &#039;token&#039; and &#039;clue&#039; in the sense of &#039;an indication&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robi &#038; Roger<br />
You need to think of &#8216;token&#8217; and &#8216;clue&#8217; in the sense of &#8216;an indication&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152181</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Robi, if by any chance you&#039;re still there. I too was hoping for some clarification wrt 12a. The on-line OD has:

TOKEN: &lt;i&gt;noun&lt;/i&gt; ... &lt;i&gt;(archaic)&lt;/i&gt; a badge or favour worn to indicate allegiance to a particular person or party .

In this sense I guess you could say that a rosette worn at election time acts as a &lt;i&gt;clue&lt;/i&gt; to a candidate&#039;s political persuasion.

However, there may well be another explanation and some kind soul may well yet enlighten us !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robi, if by any chance you&#8217;re still there. I too was hoping for some clarification wrt 12a. The on-line OD has:</p>
<p>TOKEN: <i>noun</i> &#8230; <i>(archaic)</i> a badge or favour worn to indicate allegiance to a particular person or party .</p>
<p>In this sense I guess you could say that a rosette worn at election time acts as a <i>clue</i> to a candidate&#8217;s political persuasion.</p>
<p>However, there may well be another explanation and some kind soul may well yet enlighten us !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152154</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t have time yesterday for this. I found it a struggle, making me more bad-tempered as I proceeded. Half the time I solved the clue without properly parsing it, so thanks Eileen for a nice blog.

I obviously need more experience as ether=number was new to me, and made me groan out loud when I saw Pat@12&#039;s comment.

Still not sure I understand TOKEN=clue; perhaps someone can give me an appropriate phrase to show the meaning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t have time yesterday for this. I found it a struggle, making me more bad-tempered as I proceeded. Half the time I solved the clue without properly parsing it, so thanks Eileen for a nice blog.</p>
<p>I obviously need more experience as ether=number was new to me, and made me groan out loud when I saw Pat@12&#8242;s comment.</p>
<p>Still not sure I understand TOKEN=clue; perhaps someone can give me an appropriate phrase to show the meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152085</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree this was the toughest this week.
Very enjoyable, I was defeated only by 2d where Bonxie enveigled me into the usual I or me rather than &#039;alias&#039;.
I was dubious about &#039;a percentage&#039; as a definition for &#039;commission&#039; but it is in Chambers.(16a)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree this was the toughest this week.<br />
Very enjoyable, I was defeated only by 2d where Bonxie enveigled me into the usual I or me rather than &#8216;alias&#8217;.<br />
I was dubious about &#8216;a percentage&#8217; as a definition for &#8216;commission&#8217; but it is in Chambers.(16a)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/02/25/guardian-25255-bonxie/#comment-152084</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=26903#comment-152084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen for an excellent blog, and Bonxie for a stiff but fair puzzle. Carrots, I was licked as well (and not by fluorescent/flourescent golfers) - for some reason 24a, cert as banker, passed me by (and there were others I guessed but could not explain adequately). Not enough pints . . . or too many??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen for an excellent blog, and Bonxie for a stiff but fair puzzle. Carrots, I was licked as well (and not by fluorescent/flourescent golfers) &#8211; for some reason 24a, cert as banker, passed me by (and there were others I guessed but could not explain adequately). Not enough pints . . . or too many??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
