<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,265 / Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddywack</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153588</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddywack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually struggle with Paul but found this one a bit more accessible. However, 13 and 14 were just too contrived for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually struggle with Paul but found this one a bit more accessible. However, 13 and 14 were just too contrived for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosafina</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153559</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosafina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great puzzle, and Autocue and Womb Leasing both made me laugh out loud!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great puzzle, and Autocue and Womb Leasing both made me laugh out loud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadLogician</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153478</link>
		<dc:creator>MadLogician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 04:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fuzzy logic doesn&#039;t seem like an oxymoron to a logician.  By Godel&#039;s theorem any sufficiently complex logical system -has- to be fuzzy, in the sense that there are questions which cannot be answered within the system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuzzy logic doesn&#8217;t seem like an oxymoron to a logician.  By Godel&#8217;s theorem any sufficiently complex logical system -has- to be fuzzy, in the sense that there are questions which cannot be answered within the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153450</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had no problems with the oxymoronic clues.
My PinC liked the fact that both consisted of two parts, one Across, the other one Down - oxymoronic, see.

MINICAR is in American dictionaries without a hyphen, but perhaps for some one more ... oxymoronic thing.

Best clues today?
We thought: VENDETTA, AUTOCUE, RAYLEIGH and EQUILATERAL.

Pity though, that in two consecutive clues (11,12etc) we had exactly the same anagram indicator. Very unlike Paul.

But a good puzzle overall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had no problems with the oxymoronic clues.<br />
My PinC liked the fact that both consisted of two parts, one Across, the other one Down &#8211; oxymoronic, see.</p>
<p>MINICAR is in American dictionaries without a hyphen, but perhaps for some one more &#8230; oxymoronic thing.</p>
<p>Best clues today?<br />
We thought: VENDETTA, AUTOCUE, RAYLEIGH and EQUILATERAL.</p>
<p>Pity though, that in two consecutive clues (11,12etc) we had exactly the same anagram indicator. Very unlike Paul.</p>
<p>But a good puzzle overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin P</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153443</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red face here as I work in the medium but got locked into &quot;article&quot; rather than &quot;autocue&quot;.
I liked &quot;promiscuous&quot; as anagram indicator, &quot;all over the place&quot; I suppose!
I made a few mistakes so thanks to all for the excellent explanations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red face here as I work in the medium but got locked into &#8220;article&#8221; rather than &#8220;autocue&#8221;.<br />
I liked &#8220;promiscuous&#8221; as anagram indicator, &#8220;all over the place&#8221; I suppose!<br />
I made a few mistakes so thanks to all for the excellent explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153441</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically, zombies aren&#039;t living dead- they&#039;re &lt;i&gt;walking&lt;/i&gt; dead.  Vampires are living dead.  Zombies aren&#039;t considered to have lives.  Like people who&#039;d make that distinction, I guess. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, zombies aren&#8217;t living dead- they&#8217;re <i>walking</i> dead.  Vampires are living dead.  Zombies aren&#8217;t considered to have lives.  Like people who&#8217;d make that distinction, I guess. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153417</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, Eileen. This must have been a little easier for a Paul because I managed to solve it on the tube, with no recourse to check buttons etc. My last was 13dn -- the OI raised a smile!

I didn&#039;t mind the &#039;oxymoronic&#039; ones, but MINICAR as a word seems a little odd to me. 

Never heard of RAYLEIGH but the cluing was impeccable (and funny).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, Eileen. This must have been a little easier for a Paul because I managed to solve it on the tube, with no recourse to check buttons etc. My last was 13dn &#8212; the OI raised a smile!</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t mind the &#8216;oxymoronic&#8217; ones, but MINICAR as a word seems a little odd to me. </p>
<p>Never heard of RAYLEIGH but the cluing was impeccable (and funny).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153415</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen

Thanks. Its not the first time I&#039;ve put things too elliptically.

I suspect I may be up a gum tree with oxymoron, but until I checked today, I had not realised its exact etymology and had thought the evocation of &#039;moronic&#039; was just accidental. It seems it is a late Latin word coined from the two Greek roots &#039;oxy&#039; (sharp) and &#039;moros&#039; (dull, stupid, foolish). It does not apparently occur in Ancient Greek.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen</p>
<p>Thanks. Its not the first time I&#8217;ve put things too elliptically.</p>
<p>I suspect I may be up a gum tree with oxymoron, but until I checked today, I had not realised its exact etymology and had thought the evocation of &#8216;moronic&#8217; was just accidental. It seems it is a late Latin word coined from the two Greek roots &#8216;oxy&#8217; (sharp) and &#8216;moros&#8217; (dull, stupid, foolish). It does not apparently occur in Ancient Greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153414</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi tupu @22

&quot;With your reading, the ‘s = has’ moves it from the solution.&quot;

I&#039;m not sure what this means but please don&#039;t worry about it. I was over-complicating things and imagining objections whare there weren&#039;t any. Your reading @14 makes perfect sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi tupu @22</p>
<p>&#8220;With your reading, the ‘s = has’ moves it from the solution.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what this means but please don&#8217;t worry about it. I was over-complicating things and imagining objections whare there weren&#8217;t any. Your reading @14 makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/09/guardian-25265-paul/#comment-153413</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27288#comment-153413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen.
Agree with beermagnet that &lt;i&gt;minicar&lt;/i&gt; is rather strange and wonder if it&#039;s another example of the gap/hyphen being lost in American English (ref. yesterday&#039;s discussion). Took the oxymorons for what they were and quite liked them (like &lt;i&gt;fun run&lt;/i&gt; better, though !). 

Carrots @25 ... I did something similar with &lt;i&gt;womb-letting&lt;/i&gt; as an (unexplainable) overlap of womble and letting (what a property company might be doing if there are rooms free/available). Then saw the anagram ...

Stella @16, fear not. The wife&#039;s from Essex and is quite normal (in the non-&#039;Essex&#039; sort of way). &lt;i&gt;And&lt;/i&gt; she had relatives in Rayleigh !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen.<br />
Agree with beermagnet that <i>minicar</i> is rather strange and wonder if it&#8217;s another example of the gap/hyphen being lost in American English (ref. yesterday&#8217;s discussion). Took the oxymorons for what they were and quite liked them (like <i>fun run</i> better, though !). </p>
<p>Carrots @25 &#8230; I did something similar with <i>womb-letting</i> as an (unexplainable) overlap of womble and letting (what a property company might be doing if there are rooms free/available). Then saw the anagram &#8230;</p>
<p>Stella @16, fear not. The wife&#8217;s from Essex and is quite normal (in the non-&#8217;Essex&#8217; sort of way). <i>And</i> she had relatives in Rayleigh !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
