Comments on: Beelzebub 1098 http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/13/beelzebub-1098/ Never knowingly undersolved. Thu, 23 May 2013 23:16:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Simon Harris http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/13/beelzebub-1098/#comment-155070 Simon Harris Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:37:47 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27284#comment-155070 Thanks Jed and Rishi. Scandalously, I’ve only just got around to polishing this one off. Was beaten by 11ac and also 14ac, though can now see that they make perfect sense, as one expects from Beelzebub.

]]> By: Rishi http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/13/beelzebub-1098/#comment-153823 Rishi Sun, 13 Mar 2011 08:40:28 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27284#comment-153823 I think 24 is
[j]INKED
For jink, Chambers has
vi to dodge nimbly; to make a sudden evasive turn (aeronautics).

]]>