<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,643 by Dogberry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:16:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, PeeDee.
As far as I can see in my &#039;archive&#039;, this is the first Dogberry puzzle since July 21th last year. His rentree was not as tricky as I had hoped for, but there is still a lot to admire - good variety in devices.
I would call this crossword &#039;deceptively easy&#039; for a Biggle - many words in Round 1, a much slower Round 2 and a final Round in which I had to ask my PinC (for the SW (PUNISH and the splendid HERALDRY).

I have the puzzle right in front of me at the moment, and looking at the clues again, I have to say that the clu(e)ing is so even (and faultless) that it&#039;s hard to select a Clue of the Day. Although VINTAGE (21ac) and MAENAD (9d) come quite near.

I liked it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, PeeDee.<br />
As far as I can see in my &#8216;archive&#8217;, this is the first Dogberry puzzle since July 21th last year. His rentree was not as tricky as I had hoped for, but there is still a lot to admire &#8211; good variety in devices.<br />
I would call this crossword &#8216;deceptively easy&#8217; for a Biggle &#8211; many words in Round 1, a much slower Round 2 and a final Round in which I had to ask my PinC (for the SW (PUNISH and the splendid HERALDRY).</p>
<p>I have the puzzle right in front of me at the moment, and looking at the clues again, I have to say that the clu(e)ing is so even (and faultless) that it&#8217;s hard to select a Clue of the Day. Although VINTAGE (21ac) and MAENAD (9d) come quite near.</p>
<p>I liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154172</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi again, PeeDee @8 - and Robi @10

Yes, I see what you mean - but &#039;finery&#039;, in itself, has always, to me, sounded artificial [and I&#039;ve just looked up Chambers, which gives &#039;showy adornments&#039;]. I have to admit to having been beguiled by a bit of bling myself - it can be fun, especially at my age!

Re your comment 9, PeeDee: that&#039;s interesting - I do like to know! :-) . I find it fascinating how all [I think] of the setters who supply puzzles for more than one publication covered by this site manage to present a slightly different persona for each. &#039;New&#039; compilers appear, only to be revealed as old favourites, eg, most recently, Redshank, who burst onto this thread a couple of months ago and was outed as our old friend Crucible / Radian! 

And, of course, it was great to be able to put actual faces to eleven of them at our January get-together in Derby! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again, PeeDee @8 &#8211; and Robi @10</p>
<p>Yes, I see what you mean &#8211; but &#8216;finery&#8217;, in itself, has always, to me, sounded artificial [and I've just looked up Chambers, which gives 'showy adornments']. I have to admit to having been beguiled by a bit of bling myself &#8211; it can be fun, especially at my age!</p>
<p>Re your comment 9, PeeDee: that&#8217;s interesting &#8211; I do like to know! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  . I find it fascinating how all [I think] of the setters who supply puzzles for more than one publication covered by this site manage to present a slightly different persona for each. &#8216;New&#8217; compilers appear, only to be revealed as old favourites, eg, most recently, Redshank, who burst onto this thread a couple of months ago and was outed as our old friend Crucible / Radian! </p>
<p>And, of course, it was great to be able to put actual faces to eleven of them at our January get-together in Derby! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnomethang</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154167</link>
		<dc:creator>gnomethang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent puzzle where the last four clues kept me going for a good while before the copper fell.
Thanks Dogberry and PeeDee. Nice to see MAENAD and GAGA turning up in the same puzzle - perhaps she would approve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent puzzle where the last four clues kept me going for a good while before the copper fell.<br />
Thanks Dogberry and PeeDee. Nice to see MAENAD and GAGA turning up in the same puzzle &#8211; perhaps she would approve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154161</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From mysterious Robi; I&#039;m afraid I didn&#039;t do this puzzle - just interested in the discussion. I always think of bling as fairly rubbishy jewelry, so thought I would comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From mysterious Robi; I&#8217;m afraid I didn&#8217;t do this puzzle &#8211; just interested in the discussion. I always think of bling as fairly rubbishy jewelry, so thought I would comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154160</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correct Robi@8, false finery = bling was the line I set off down on this clue, before backtracking and realising &#039;false&#039; really stood in for &#039;sham&#039;.  The first idea didn&#039;t get properly erased from my brain and sort of leaked out again as I was writing the blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct Robi@8, false finery = bling was the line I set off down on this clue, before backtracking and realising &#8216;false&#8217; really stood in for &#8216;sham&#8217;.  The first idea didn&#8217;t get properly erased from my brain and sort of leaked out again as I was writing the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154159</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re identifying pseudonyms with the real people, I quite like not knowing too much about who does what puzzle.  It preserves an air of mystery about the whole process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re identifying pseudonyms with the real people, I quite like not knowing too much about who does what puzzle.  It preserves an air of mystery about the whole process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154157</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eileen, re. 17; I assume it might be because &#039;bling&#039; could be synonymous with &#039;false finery.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen, re. 17; I assume it might be because &#8216;bling&#8217; could be synonymous with &#8216;false finery.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154156</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eileen, quite right, the sham comment is nonesense, I&#039;ll delete it.  Thanks for pointing this out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen, quite right, the sham comment is nonesense, I&#8217;ll delete it.  Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154146</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, PeeDee, for a good blog of an enjoyable puzzle - as you say, perhaps rather gentler than John Young with his Shed hat on. [See Crossword Who&#039;s Who in &#039;Best for Puzzles&#039; under &#039;Links&#039;, above.]

I liked 29ac, too - and also thought 21ac had a very nice surface.

Re 17ac: I&#039;m puzzled by your ‘sham’ does double duty in this clue&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, PeeDee, for a good blog of an enjoyable puzzle &#8211; as you say, perhaps rather gentler than John Young with his Shed hat on. [See Crossword Who's Who in 'Best for Puzzles' under 'Links', above.]</p>
<p>I liked 29ac, too &#8211; and also thought 21ac had a very nice surface.</p>
<p>Re 17ac: I&#8217;m puzzled by your ‘sham’ does double duty in this clue&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeeDee</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/financial-times-13643-by-dogberry/#comment-154123</link>
		<dc:creator>PeeDee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27504#comment-154123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi bamberger, 

A Virago is an assertive loud domineering woman, so I guess the Maenads&#039; behaviour of drunken carousing, sexualy proclivity and eating raw flesh of animals (supposedly including men and children) could qualify them as Viragos.

Apparently chantage come from the french &#039;to sing&#039; (if I don&#039;t get paid to keep my mouth shut).  Not a word I hear used often in our neck of the woods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi bamberger, </p>
<p>A Virago is an assertive loud domineering woman, so I guess the Maenads&#8217; behaviour of drunken carousing, sexualy proclivity and eating raw flesh of animals (supposedly including men and children) could qualify them as Viragos.</p>
<p>Apparently chantage come from the french &#8216;to sing&#8217; (if I don&#8217;t get paid to keep my mouth shut).  Not a word I hear used often in our neck of the woods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
