<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7617 / Dac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:55:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154210</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 23:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Flash. The machine thinks I&#039;m naughty, but I don&#039;t know why! Gaufrid sorted it out and put my 5 - the first version of the comment - on afterwards. Perhaps it&#039;s the start of a black ops thing - you know how paranoid we are these days. Better check the cash card ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Flash. The machine thinks I&#8217;m naughty, but I don&#8217;t know why! Gaufrid sorted it out and put my 5 &#8211; the first version of the comment &#8211; on afterwards. Perhaps it&#8217;s the start of a black ops thing &#8211; you know how paranoid we are these days. Better check the cash card &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154206</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@PaulB have you got yourself onto a naughty list? Given the order your posts arrived? Tees myself up for something I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@PaulB have you got yourself onto a naughty list? Given the order your posts arrived? Tees myself up for something I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154171</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[test]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154164</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8 I like your development using &#039;at rovers&#039; (and that could be a fantastic anag ind for fodder that happened to form another team name, e.g. West Ham United at Rovers for boring old THE NEW STADIUM), but there&#039;s always the possibility that Dac here regards d, o, n, c, a, s, t, e and r all as &#039;rovers&#039;, i.e. wanderers. And now we&#039;re back to footie again. And now it&#039;s on the telly - so byeee!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8 I like your development using &#8216;at rovers&#8217; (and that could be a fantastic anag ind for fodder that happened to form another team name, e.g. West Ham United at Rovers for boring old THE NEW STADIUM), but there&#8217;s always the possibility that Dac here regards d, o, n, c, a, s, t, e and r all as &#8216;rovers&#8217;, i.e. wanderers. And now we&#8217;re back to footie again. And now it&#8217;s on the telly &#8211; so byeee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154163</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right up to Dac&#039;s usual standard. I thought the &amp;lits at 1ac and 15ac were brilliant. Like you, Gaufrid, I was uneasy with &#039;Rovers&#039;.

At 10ac I had Heanon (he + anon), of whom I&#039;d never heard, but he does appear to exist now I look. However it&#039;s obviously Lennon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right up to Dac&#8217;s usual standard. I thought the &amp;lits at 1ac and 15ac were brilliant. Like you, Gaufrid, I was uneasy with &#8216;Rovers&#8217;.</p>
<p>At 10ac I had Heanon (he + anon), of whom I&#8217;d never heard, but he does appear to exist now I look. However it&#8217;s obviously Lennon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154154</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quiet in here today. Like Gaufrid I found this on the easy side but not sure why that is, perhaps it&#039;s the fewer than usual cryptic or double definition clues and no obscure answers. Rather harder tomorrow, I expect, as is the Thursday way round here. Thanks Gaufrid for the blog and Dac of course for the puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quiet in here today. Like Gaufrid I found this on the easy side but not sure why that is, perhaps it&#8217;s the fewer than usual cryptic or double definition clues and no obscure answers. Rather harder tomorrow, I expect, as is the Thursday way round here. Thanks Gaufrid for the blog and Dac of course for the puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154114</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid for the blog and Dac for an enjoyable puzzle, not difficult, but fair.

Favourites were 1A SHADOW CABINET, v.g. &amp;lit, 25A SMELLING SALTS nicely cryptic defn, and 14D MARTINMAS.  Glad you remembered the 60&#039;s DION.  I guess the indicator in 8A could mean that the letters in &quot;Doncaster&quot; are &quot;rovers&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid for the blog and Dac for an enjoyable puzzle, not difficult, but fair.</p>
<p>Favourites were 1A SHADOW CABINET, v.g. &amp;lit, 25A SMELLING SALTS nicely cryptic defn, and 14D MARTINMAS.  Glad you remembered the 60&#8242;s DION.  I guess the indicator in 8A could mean that the letters in &#8220;Doncaster&#8221; are &#8220;rovers&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/16/independent-7617-dac/#comment-154103</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27497#comment-154103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Gaufrid, for the blog, and thanks to Dac for a fine puzzle.  Just when I thought I would get stuck, another one went in, so I was able eventually to appreciate the crossword as a whole.

I thought SHADOW CABINET was an excellent &amp;lit and SMELLING SALTS made me smile.  I think &#039;rovers&#039; is fine as an anagrind (setters in Another Place get away with much worse) and was justified by the excellent surface.

With the much-missed Virgilius&#039; alter ego giving us a super puzzle today in Another Place, this has been a very good Wednesday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Gaufrid, for the blog, and thanks to Dac for a fine puzzle.  Just when I thought I would get stuck, another one went in, so I was able eventually to appreciate the crossword as a whole.</p>
<p>I thought SHADOW CABINET was an excellent &amp;lit and SMELLING SALTS made me smile.  I think &#8216;rovers&#8217; is fine as an anagrind (setters in Another Place get away with much worse) and was justified by the excellent surface.</p>
<p>With the much-missed Virgilius&#8217; alter ego giving us a super puzzle today in Another Place, this has been a very good Wednesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
