<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,651 / Falcon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveDove</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-155067</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveDove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-155067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Sil van den Hoek for directing me to this puzzle from today&#039;s Everyman, most enjoyable.

A little late perhaps, but I share your view about Dido, Eileen.

And while thanks are due to shuchi, I think describing Sir Lawrence Olivier as a celebrated actor in the &quot;early 1900s&quot; hardly does justice to a man whose careeer spanned over half of that century.

And I too fell into the &quot;Ein&quot; trap for didgeridoo at first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sil van den Hoek for directing me to this puzzle from today&#8217;s Everyman, most enjoyable.</p>
<p>A little late perhaps, but I share your view about Dido, Eileen.</p>
<p>And while thanks are due to shuchi, I think describing Sir Lawrence Olivier as a celebrated actor in the &#8220;early 1900s&#8221; hardly does justice to a man whose careeer spanned over half of that century.</p>
<p>And I too fell into the &#8220;Ein&#8221; trap for didgeridoo at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-155011</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-155011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bamberger, don&#039;t get me wrong, I was only talking about this specific puzzle, which I found a lot easier than the average Falcon. Others may disagree, of course.

In my opinion, this puzzle was similar to an Everyman, also in the style of clueing, where his Falcon puzzles normally have just thát little bit extra.
All this is no criticism, nor disdain for anyone who found it challenging.
We all experience crosswords in our own way.

Moreover, I like to emphasise that to me Falcon is a very good setter.
And as there are so many admirers of Everyman (look at the number of posts every Sunday), there must be solvers whose hearts will beat faster when they see the name of his alter ego in the FT.
Not sure whether all these solvers know that Everyman = Falcon.
Sometimes I would like to start a campaign to make Observer solvers aware of this, if necessary, to &#039;seduce&#039; them to this (often lonely) corner of Fifteensquared.

Re Redshank, I agree with you that especially the second Redshank was very easy. But I think, comparing them ends here. Redshank uses techniques very different from Falcon&#039;s, in particular he puts a lot of thought into the surface reading of his clues (which are similar in style to his more fiendish alter egos Radian and Crucible, both(?) much admired by me).
I haste to say that this doesn&#039;t say anything about Falcon!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bamberger, don&#8217;t get me wrong, I was only talking about this specific puzzle, which I found a lot easier than the average Falcon. Others may disagree, of course.</p>
<p>In my opinion, this puzzle was similar to an Everyman, also in the style of clueing, where his Falcon puzzles normally have just thát little bit extra.<br />
All this is no criticism, nor disdain for anyone who found it challenging.<br />
We all experience crosswords in our own way.</p>
<p>Moreover, I like to emphasise that to me Falcon is a very good setter.<br />
And as there are so many admirers of Everyman (look at the number of posts every Sunday), there must be solvers whose hearts will beat faster when they see the name of his alter ego in the FT.<br />
Not sure whether all these solvers know that Everyman = Falcon.<br />
Sometimes I would like to start a campaign to make Observer solvers aware of this, if necessary, to &#8216;seduce&#8217; them to this (often lonely) corner of Fifteensquared.</p>
<p>Re Redshank, I agree with you that especially the second Redshank was very easy. But I think, comparing them ends here. Redshank uses techniques very different from Falcon&#8217;s, in particular he puts a lot of thought into the surface reading of his clues (which are similar in style to his more fiendish alter egos Radian and Crucible, both(?) much admired by me).<br />
I haste to say that this doesn&#8217;t say anything about Falcon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154980</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re 10 -I would describe Redshank as easier than Falcon. I have definitely solved two Redshanks without aids but while I&#039;ve got close, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve got there with Falcon yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 10 -I would describe Redshank as easier than Falcon. I have definitely solved two Redshanks without aids but while I&#8217;ve got close, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve got there with Falcon yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154978</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falcon is the FT&#039;s Everyman, writer of accessible crosswords.
In my opinion, this puzzle was very easy.
To avoid making any enemies: well written, too!
Once more a puzzle that should attract all those solvers that enjoy Falcon&#039;s alter ego.

Thank you, shuchi, for your blog, most appreciated.
It was clear that 20d was ENDORSE, but your wise words made clear that my parsing was wrong. Thought that NDO might perhaps be a kind of degree, placed inside ERSE (English Language). Oops, English? Gaelic! 

No DIDGERIDOO problems for me [apart from spelling it wrong initially]. 
No problems with Dido either, saw it immediately. 
Fine performer [saw her about 7 years ago in Rotterdam], lovely woman too. A real shame that there&#039;s no place for her anymore in a world full of Gaga&#039;s and Perry&#039;s.
English folk-rockers The Levellers, a band I have seen many many times, had at one point a didgeridoo player on stage. And in Utrecht, my &#039;home town&#039;, we had a street artist with that long thing, a boring thing, in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcon is the FT&#8217;s Everyman, writer of accessible crosswords.<br />
In my opinion, this puzzle was very easy.<br />
To avoid making any enemies: well written, too!<br />
Once more a puzzle that should attract all those solvers that enjoy Falcon&#8217;s alter ego.</p>
<p>Thank you, shuchi, for your blog, most appreciated.<br />
It was clear that 20d was ENDORSE, but your wise words made clear that my parsing was wrong. Thought that NDO might perhaps be a kind of degree, placed inside ERSE (English Language). Oops, English? Gaelic! </p>
<p>No DIDGERIDOO problems for me [apart from spelling it wrong initially].<br />
No problems with Dido either, saw it immediately.<br />
Fine performer [saw her about 7 years ago in Rotterdam], lovely woman too. A real shame that there&#8217;s no place for her anymore in a world full of Gaga&#8217;s and Perry&#8217;s.<br />
English folk-rockers The Levellers, a band I have seen many many times, had at one point a didgeridoo player on stage. And in Utrecht, my &#8216;home town&#8217;, we had a street artist with that long thing, a boring thing, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154971</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen, thanks for the link - the didgeridoo is a sure limelight-stealer! As I type this, the clock points to 1:10am. I&#039;m going to bed now. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen, thanks for the link &#8211; the didgeridoo is a sure limelight-stealer! As I type this, the clock points to 1:10am. I&#8217;m going to bed now. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154969</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi shuchi

Sorry for jumping in - I thought you might have gone to bed [I&#039;m not absolutely sure of the time difference. :-)]

I sympathise: I committed two &#039;sins of omission&#039; on my own blog today! 

As Bryan says, if you&#039;ve heard of Rolf Harris, you&#039;ll know of the didgeridoo and if not ... [they&#039;re practically inseparable.]

This is what it sounds like:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAd59mJ7dsU

One more thing: as a Classicist, I find it poignant to see DIDO clued as &#039;pop singer&#039; - but we must move with the times ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi shuchi</p>
<p>Sorry for jumping in &#8211; I thought you might have gone to bed [I'm not absolutely sure of the time difference. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ]</p>
<p>I sympathise: I committed two &#8216;sins of omission&#8217; on my own blog today! </p>
<p>As Bryan says, if you&#8217;ve heard of Rolf Harris, you&#8217;ll know of the didgeridoo and if not &#8230; [they're practically inseparable.]</p>
<p>This is what it sounds like:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAd59mJ7dsU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAd59mJ7dsU</a></p>
<p>One more thing: as a Classicist, I find it poignant to see DIDO clued as &#8216;pop singer&#8217; &#8211; but we must move with the times &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154965</link>
		<dc:creator>bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too got stuck on the instrument and gto hung up over having ein to start with. Once I&#039;d used a solver, the SW corner fell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too got stuck on the instrument and gto hung up over having ein to start with. Once I&#8217;d used a solver, the SW corner fell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154960</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[14d: I missed the word &quot;party&quot; while writing the blog - thanks for setting that right, Eileen. Will update the main post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14d: I missed the word &#8220;party&#8221; while writing the blog &#8211; thanks for setting that right, Eileen. Will update the main post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154955</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, shuchi.

Hi Mike Card

14dn is GER I DO [party] in DIDO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, shuchi.</p>
<p>Hi Mike Card</p>
<p>14dn is GER I DO [party] in DIDO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Card</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/03/25/financial-times-13651-falcon/#comment-154954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=27737#comment-154954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a disagreement with DIDGERIDOO....   as the explanation provided, and from the clueing, would make it DIDGERIDO.   I&#039;ve read the clue again, and can&#039;t find anything to offer a second O.

And is the word &quot;party&quot; completely unnecessary ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a disagreement with DIDGERIDOO&#8230;.   as the explanation provided, and from the clueing, would make it DIDGERIDO.   I&#8217;ve read the clue again, and can&#8217;t find anything to offer a second O.</p>
<p>And is the word &#8220;party&#8221; completely unnecessary ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
