<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Prize 25,292 / Bonxie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggles A</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156810</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggles A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks again NeilW. I did revisit and appreciate your patience with me but I think Eileen&#039;s advice is sound.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again NeilW. I did revisit and appreciate your patience with me but I think Eileen&#8217;s advice is sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156799</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi NeilW

I don&#039;t want to labour this [and it seems you don&#039;t, either. :-) ].

Certainly your phrase works but, as I suggested in the blog,  &#039;virtuous&#039; means &#039;having [not has] many virtues&#039;. &#039;Has many virtues&#039; = &#039;IS virtuous&#039;. 

But let&#039;s leave it there, shall we? No one else seemed to mind!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi NeilW</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to labour this [and it seems you don't, either. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ].</p>
<p>Certainly your phrase works but, as I suggested in the blog,  &#8216;virtuous&#8217; means &#8216;having [not has] many virtues&#8217;. &#8216;Has many virtues&#8217; = &#8216;IS virtuous&#8217;. </p>
<p>But let&#8217;s leave it there, shall we? No one else seemed to mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilW</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156794</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Biggles A - I don&#039;t suppose you&#039;ll revisit this, but imagine the phrase, &quot;He is a virtuous man.&quot; I don&#039;t think one would understand this to mean, &quot;He has a single virtue&quot; but rather that he has quite a few, from which one may arrive, reasonably, at &quot;many&quot;.

Eileen, I can&#039;t quite understand your objection to the grammar. Surely, using the phrase above, the virtuous man... has many virtues?

Sorry - just filling time between the F1 race and the Liverpool game!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Biggles A &#8211; I don&#8217;t suppose you&#8217;ll revisit this, but imagine the phrase, &#8220;He is a virtuous man.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think one would understand this to mean, &#8220;He has a single virtue&#8221; but rather that he has quite a few, from which one may arrive, reasonably, at &#8220;many&#8221;.</p>
<p>Eileen, I can&#8217;t quite understand your objection to the grammar. Surely, using the phrase above, the virtuous man&#8230; has many virtues?</p>
<p>Sorry &#8211; just filling time between the F1 race and the Liverpool game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggles A</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156789</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggles A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks NeilW and Eileen. I knew the OED has CHASTE as a synonym but I wasn&#039;t sure just how many virtues, if any, that might encompass. Still a bit doubtful I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks NeilW and Eileen. I knew the OED has CHASTE as a synonym but I wasn&#8217;t sure just how many virtues, if any, that might encompass. Still a bit doubtful I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156778</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further re knout

Nowt is of course a variant of nought (when pronounced as in drought as opposed to as in fought). 

I am reminded of the well known &#039;Tyke&#039; injunction &#039;If tha&#039; ever does owt for nowt, allus make sure tha does it for tha sen&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further re knout</p>
<p>Nowt is of course a variant of nought (when pronounced as in drought as opposed to as in fought). </p>
<p>I am reminded of the well known &#8216;Tyke&#8217; injunction &#8216;If tha&#8217; ever does owt for nowt, allus make sure tha does it for tha sen&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156767</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 06:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Biggles

And I apologise for not addressing your query.

As I indicated, I wasn&#039;t entirely happy with this clue, because the grammar seems wrong. I think your unease is perhaps with the &#039;many&#039; virtues. Collins gives &#039;exercising self-restraint&#039;, and, I suppose, thus avoiding a number of vices, ergo having many virtues!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Biggles</p>
<p>And I apologise for not addressing your query.</p>
<p>As I indicated, I wasn&#8217;t entirely happy with this clue, because the grammar seems wrong. I think your unease is perhaps with the &#8216;many&#8217; virtues. Collins gives &#8216;exercising self-restraint&#8217;, and, I suppose, thus avoiding a number of vices, ergo having many virtues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilW</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156762</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 02:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Biggles A

At the time, CONTINENT concerned me too but Chambers gave, under &quot;adjective&quot;, meaning 4: Virtuous. It seemed fair enough to me...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Biggles A</p>
<p>At the time, CONTINENT concerned me too but Chambers gave, under &#8220;adjective&#8221;, meaning 4: Virtuous. It seemed fair enough to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biggles A</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156758</link>
		<dc:creator>Biggles A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a bit surprised that nobody has educated me on the relevance of CONTINENT to MANY VIRTUES.

I have to confess that the theme had eluded me but I now acknowledge the &quot;wit&quot; involved. Thanks tupu. I wonder why ZERO wasn&#039;t worked in there somewhere.

It was churlish of me not to express my appreciation Eileen, I apologise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit surprised that nobody has educated me on the relevance of CONTINENT to MANY VIRTUES.</p>
<p>I have to confess that the theme had eluded me but I now acknowledge the &#8220;wit&#8221; involved. Thanks tupu. I wonder why ZERO wasn&#8217;t worked in there somewhere.</p>
<p>It was churlish of me not to express my appreciation Eileen, I apologise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156757</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ps
Bonxie has apparently been setting for the Guardian since 2004. We have had one puzzle each month this year, and there were eight last year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps<br />
Bonxie has apparently been setting for the Guardian since 2004. We have had one puzzle each month this year, and there were eight last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/16/guardian-prize-25292-bonxie/#comment-156756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28557#comment-156756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for an outstanding job Eileen. Your comprehensive annotations are a real tour de force.

I would like to congratulate Bonxie for providing us with a classic crossword puzzle. Definitely a case of something about nothing.

Top marks for stretching the theme its limit. A rewarding solve were it not for the fact that I erred with 19 dn by inserting AUSTEN and leaning it there. Very poor on my part.

Many commendable clues on display. Surely none better than NIXON. LINNET &amp; NADAL also top drawer.

Solving time 1 hr 48 m with one error.

PS

I couldn&#039;t see Cynical having inserted it into the grid. Many thanks for the explanation]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for an outstanding job Eileen. Your comprehensive annotations are a real tour de force.</p>
<p>I would like to congratulate Bonxie for providing us with a classic crossword puzzle. Definitely a case of something about nothing.</p>
<p>Top marks for stretching the theme its limit. A rewarding solve were it not for the fact that I erred with 19 dn by inserting AUSTEN and leaning it there. Very poor on my part.</p>
<p>Many commendable clues on display. Surely none better than NIXON. LINNET &amp; NADAL also top drawer.</p>
<p>Solving time 1 hr 48 m with one error.</p>
<p>PS</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t see Cynical having inserted it into the grid. Many thanks for the explanation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
