<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azed 2029</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/24/azed-2029/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/24/azed-2029/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/24/azed-2029/#comment-157312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28834#comment-157312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Andrew.  I found this one to be quite a quick solve thanks to 1d, but I&#039;m still wondering about the apostrophe in Levi&#039;s.

I was happy with BETIDED, but you&#039;ve started me thinking about the phrase, &#039;time and tide&#039; - which tide?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andrew.  I found this one to be quite a quick solve thanks to 1d, but I&#8217;m still wondering about the apostrophe in Levi&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I was happy with BETIDED, but you&#8217;ve started me thinking about the phrase, &#8216;time and tide&#8217; &#8211; which tide?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tor</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/24/azed-2029/#comment-157292</link>
		<dc:creator>Tor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 03:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=28834#comment-157292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that&#039;s a good blog Andrew.

I have always suspected that Scapa is simply an ignorant version of scarper and the rhyming slang link is entirely wrong. Justification after the event.

I suspect auto-reverse is an almost forgotten bit of technology already.

I agree that BETIDED is not really up yo Azed standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s a good blog Andrew.</p>
<p>I have always suspected that Scapa is simply an ignorant version of scarper and the rhyming slang link is entirely wrong. Justification after the event.</p>
<p>I suspect auto-reverse is an almost forgotten bit of technology already.</p>
<p>I agree that BETIDED is not really up yo Azed standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
