<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,308 / Tramp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ste</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-158315</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-158315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Superb puzzle. Inspired me to make this, my one and only contribution here. Thanks, Tramp, for the Eureka moments connecting up the references (which eventually I got)
My main hurdle was &#039;ratification&#039;. I thought Basil was &#039;in&#039; the ratatouille not the episode. Once Tbilisi fell, the bottom left-hand corner slotted into place.
Looking forward to seeing more, Tramp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb puzzle. Inspired me to make this, my one and only contribution here. Thanks, Tramp, for the Eureka moments connecting up the references (which eventually I got)<br />
My main hurdle was &#8216;ratification&#8217;. I thought Basil was &#8216;in&#8217; the ratatouille not the episode. Once Tbilisi fell, the bottom left-hand corner slotted into place.<br />
Looking forward to seeing more, Tramp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157916</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 03:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Eileen, nice to hear back from you!  I always post so late to these things I never really expect feedback, but since I was only a day behind (and posted a fifty thousand word essay) I suspected I might see something. 

I was surprised indeed that noone caught that &quot;I&quot;.

To my ear, &quot;Lucy&quot; is pronounced (or sung?) Lucee, while &quot;lucid&quot; is pronounced, well, lucid (or loose-id) - a short i sound.  A minor quibble considering.  It might even be one of those regional accent things.

And I enjoyed the surfeit of long clues, it was almost a theme of the puzzle, in a sense.  Looking forward to your next blog!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eileen, nice to hear back from you!  I always post so late to these things I never really expect feedback, but since I was only a day behind (and posted a fifty thousand word essay) I suspected I might see something. </p>
<p>I was surprised indeed that noone caught that &#8220;I&#8221;.</p>
<p>To my ear, &#8220;Lucy&#8221; is pronounced (or sung?) Lucee, while &#8220;lucid&#8221; is pronounced, well, lucid (or loose-id) &#8211; a short i sound.  A minor quibble considering.  It might even be one of those regional accent things.</p>
<p>And I enjoyed the surfeit of long clues, it was almost a theme of the puzzle, in a sense.  Looking forward to your next blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157832</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Huw Powell

&quot;Also I don’t think anyone mentioned this at 26:

“LIMITING: M[cCartney] + IT [sex] in LING [Heather]” needs the “one” to make the third I&quot;

You&#039;re absolutely right, Huw - how on earth did I get away with that for so long?

&quot;One tiny quibble: “Lucy” does not sound like the LUCI in LUCID.&quot;

I&#039;m afraid I have to disagree there. I&#039;ve said both over to myself a number of times and they don&#039;t sound different to me. 

I&#039;m not expecting anyone still to be out there but I just want to add something to the &#039;brevity is wit&#039; debate. I almost did so last night but decided against it.

I know that the &#039;ideal&#039; average length of clue for a puzzle is supposed to be something like 5.5 words and I&#039;m a great admirer of say, Rufus&#039; two-word double definitions, but, for me, this was a totally different kind of puzzle, refreshingly so from a new compiler. The clues were, certainly, longer than the norm but, still, I didn&#039;t detect any superfluous words [which is not always the case with shorter clues]. Regular readers will know that I love story-telling clues and this puzzle had them in abundance. I&#039;m just sorry that I missed some of the nuances. I still think that the inclusion of &#039;Duck&#039;s off&#039; in 5dn was masterly.

I&#039;m really looking forward to more Tramp puzzles, especialy since he seems to be a setter who is prepared to engage in discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Huw Powell</p>
<p>&#8220;Also I don’t think anyone mentioned this at 26:</p>
<p>“LIMITING: M[cCartney] + IT [sex] in LING [Heather]” needs the “one” to make the third I&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, Huw &#8211; how on earth did I get away with that for so long?</p>
<p>&#8220;One tiny quibble: “Lucy” does not sound like the LUCI in LUCID.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I have to disagree there. I&#8217;ve said both over to myself a number of times and they don&#8217;t sound different to me. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not expecting anyone still to be out there but I just want to add something to the &#8216;brevity is wit&#8217; debate. I almost did so last night but decided against it.</p>
<p>I know that the &#8216;ideal&#8217; average length of clue for a puzzle is supposed to be something like 5.5 words and I&#8217;m a great admirer of say, Rufus&#8217; two-word double definitions, but, for me, this was a totally different kind of puzzle, refreshingly so from a new compiler. The clues were, certainly, longer than the norm but, still, I didn&#8217;t detect any superfluous words [which is not always the case with shorter clues]. Regular readers will know that I love story-telling clues and this puzzle had them in abundance. I&#8217;m just sorry that I missed some of the nuances. I still think that the inclusion of &#8216;Duck&#8217;s off&#8217; in 5dn was masterly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really looking forward to more Tramp puzzles, especialy since he seems to be a setter who is prepared to engage in discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157826</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, what a puzzle.  I stared at it a bit last night, realizing that without 1/25 I would be sunk - though at least it was a clear construction, so I could brute force it if necessary.  Looking at the themed clues made it worse, since they were all over the map.  Filled in a few of the easier clues and put it aside.  I even had &quot;BASIL?&quot; written next to the clue at 21d!

Today I was mulling it over, and somehow a combination of some of the words in the themed clues, the letters in 1/25, knowing there would be a TY in it, made the solution pop into my brain.

Now, I have seen FT many random times over the years here on American public TV, but not recently, and knew no episode titles.  Still I hoped to not have to do the obvious thing and look up the show on Wikipedia, as I suspected that would make things too easy to be any fun.

In the end I managed to fill in every square correctly, with a little help from OneLook (picking RATIFICATION out of the possibilities, and a couple-three others).  The explanation for 16 got by me, thanks Eileen, that was a brilliant clue!  TBILISI came slowly because I kept refusing to use the &quot;TB&quot; for some time.

Which leads to a quick response to Martin @19, regarding &quot;SI&quot; - as I vaguely recall, Miguel was just as likely to say &quot;si&quot; as &quot;que?&quot; in response to Basil - often a series of sis would be followed by one que?, showing that he actually understood nothing of what Basil said.

I am quite impressed with the working in of all the titles, which I did not notice, of course.

The longer clues did not bother me, although I often find them harder to work out, especially now that I see why some of them happened.

One tiny quibble:  &quot;Lucy&quot; does not sound like the LUCI in LUCID.  For a while I had an unexplained LURID in there, since it fit &quot;explicit&quot; so well.  I had rather hoped for some other Beatles song girl&#039;s name, homophoned and followed by ICE, but it was not to be.

Also I don&#039;t think anyone mentioned this at 26:

&quot;LIMITING: M[cCartney] + IT [sex] in LING [Heather]&quot;  needs the &quot;one&quot; to make the third I:

&quot;LIMITING: I [one] [piece of] M[cCartney] + IT [sex] in LING [Heather]&quot;

Sorry for the long list of random comments, but this puzzle made me want to take a short holiday in a poorly-run hotel...

Thanks for the grand outing, Tramp, and the well-done blog, Eileen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a puzzle.  I stared at it a bit last night, realizing that without 1/25 I would be sunk &#8211; though at least it was a clear construction, so I could brute force it if necessary.  Looking at the themed clues made it worse, since they were all over the map.  Filled in a few of the easier clues and put it aside.  I even had &#8220;BASIL?&#8221; written next to the clue at 21d!</p>
<p>Today I was mulling it over, and somehow a combination of some of the words in the themed clues, the letters in 1/25, knowing there would be a TY in it, made the solution pop into my brain.</p>
<p>Now, I have seen FT many random times over the years here on American public TV, but not recently, and knew no episode titles.  Still I hoped to not have to do the obvious thing and look up the show on Wikipedia, as I suspected that would make things too easy to be any fun.</p>
<p>In the end I managed to fill in every square correctly, with a little help from OneLook (picking RATIFICATION out of the possibilities, and a couple-three others).  The explanation for 16 got by me, thanks Eileen, that was a brilliant clue!  TBILISI came slowly because I kept refusing to use the &#8220;TB&#8221; for some time.</p>
<p>Which leads to a quick response to Martin @19, regarding &#8220;SI&#8221; &#8211; as I vaguely recall, Miguel was just as likely to say &#8220;si&#8221; as &#8220;que?&#8221; in response to Basil &#8211; often a series of sis would be followed by one que?, showing that he actually understood nothing of what Basil said.</p>
<p>I am quite impressed with the working in of all the titles, which I did not notice, of course.</p>
<p>The longer clues did not bother me, although I often find them harder to work out, especially now that I see why some of them happened.</p>
<p>One tiny quibble:  &#8220;Lucy&#8221; does not sound like the LUCI in LUCID.  For a while I had an unexplained LURID in there, since it fit &#8220;explicit&#8221; so well.  I had rather hoped for some other Beatles song girl&#8217;s name, homophoned and followed by ICE, but it was not to be.</p>
<p>Also I don&#8217;t think anyone mentioned this at 26:</p>
<p>&#8220;LIMITING: M[cCartney] + IT [sex] in LING [Heather]&#8221;  needs the &#8220;one&#8221; to make the third I:</p>
<p>&#8220;LIMITING: I [one] [piece of] M[cCartney] + IT [sex] in LING [Heather]&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry for the long list of random comments, but this puzzle made me want to take a short holiday in a poorly-run hotel&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the grand outing, Tramp, and the well-done blog, Eileen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaise</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157749</link>
		<dc:creator>blaise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Tramp. Hope to see more of you in the future. I thought the long clues were an interesting change and made the parsing more fun and challenging. The only downside, for me who likes to work on a printed copy, was getting a second page with nothing but the Guardian&#039;s copyright notice.

And, after 90 minutes earlier in the evening, I didn&#039;t miss Barcelona at all...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tramp. Hope to see more of you in the future. I thought the long clues were an interesting change and made the parsing more fun and challenging. The only downside, for me who likes to work on a printed copy, was getting a second page with nothing but the Guardian&#8217;s copyright notice.</p>
<p>And, after 90 minutes earlier in the evening, I didn&#8217;t miss Barcelona at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molonglo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157742</link>
		<dc:creator>molonglo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks and welcome Tramp for your opener, a tour de force.  16 across especially brilliant. Thanks also to Eileen for a brilliant blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and welcome Tramp for your opener, a tour de force.  16 across especially brilliant. Thanks also to Eileen for a brilliant blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caretman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157736</link>
		<dc:creator>caretman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the theme had been &quot;Yes Minister&quot; or &quot;The EastEnders&quot; I would have been in trouble, but this was a series I knew making it eminently solvable.  On 18ac as I first started to parse it, I thought &quot;&#039;Introduction to the builders&#039; could signal TB.  Oh, that can&#039;t be it, *nothing* starts with TB.&quot;  Until with another crossing letter or two I realised that indeed something *does* start with TB.  And with 11dn, for the longest time I was trying to make the answer be something that Basil was in one of the episodes, even at one point trying to find a 12-letter word meaning &#039;rat&#039;, until finally the pin dropped.

Oh, and I kept looking for a &quot;He&#039;s from Barcelona&quot; somewhere in the grid.  I figured surely Tramp would fit that in somehow given everything else he managed to put in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the theme had been &#8220;Yes Minister&#8221; or &#8220;The EastEnders&#8221; I would have been in trouble, but this was a series I knew making it eminently solvable.  On 18ac as I first started to parse it, I thought &#8220;&#8216;Introduction to the builders&#8217; could signal TB.  Oh, that can&#8217;t be it, *nothing* starts with TB.&#8221;  Until with another crossing letter or two I realised that indeed something *does* start with TB.  And with 11dn, for the longest time I was trying to make the answer be something that Basil was in one of the episodes, even at one point trying to find a 12-letter word meaning &#8216;rat&#8217;, until finally the pin dropped.</p>
<p>Oh, and I kept looking for a &#8220;He&#8217;s from Barcelona&#8221; somewhere in the grid.  I figured surely Tramp would fit that in somehow given everything else he managed to put in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157735</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very enjoyable puzzle - congratulations Tramp. I agree the small point size was a pain, but probably preferable to slashing the clues - I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ve seen the Guardian do this before.  
As for the single-letter indicators, I find they creep in a lot when you&#039;re compiling thematic puzzles, as they help you to stick to the theme. But if people get fed up with too many, it&#039;s just a matter of striking the right balance I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very enjoyable puzzle &#8211; congratulations Tramp. I agree the small point size was a pain, but probably preferable to slashing the clues &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve seen the Guardian do this before.<br />
As for the single-letter indicators, I find they creep in a lot when you&#8217;re compiling thematic puzzles, as they help you to stick to the theme. But if people get fed up with too many, it&#8217;s just a matter of striking the right balance I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul (not Paul)</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157734</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul (not Paul)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great fun!  I didn&#039;t complete.  Like a few others I failed on the Tripoli/Tblisi dilemma and consequently couldn&#039;t manage ratification.

As has been said earlier, brevity is the soul of wit and as a rule we would all prefer sharper clueing but that shouldn&#039;t take away from a puzzle full of style and originality.  Keep it up.

I too wondered if the Lady was a Tramp (#36-#38) but it seems not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great fun!  I didn&#8217;t complete.  Like a few others I failed on the Tripoli/Tblisi dilemma and consequently couldn&#8217;t manage ratification.</p>
<p>As has been said earlier, brevity is the soul of wit and as a rule we would all prefer sharper clueing but that shouldn&#8217;t take away from a puzzle full of style and originality.  Keep it up.</p>
<p>I too wondered if the Lady was a Tramp (#36-#38) but it seems not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/04/28/guardian-25308-tramp/#comment-157733</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29006#comment-157733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I&#039;ve said before, I&#039;m a relative newbie to properly attempting these, and it goes down as an enjoyable (and completed!!) crossword. Thanks, Tramp :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;m a relative newbie to properly attempting these, and it goes down as an enjoyable (and completed!!) crossword. Thanks, Tramp <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
