<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Genius 94, by Puck: In vino veritas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158500</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 08:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robi
Thanks for that - I hadn&#039;t realised there was feedback on numbers.  Hats off to the 271, and especially to the 21 who cracked it &lt;b&gt;on the first day&lt;/b&gt; !
Truly awesome (in the traditional sense)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robi<br />
Thanks for that &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t realised there was feedback on numbers.  Hats off to the 271, and especially to the 21 who cracked it <b>on the first day</b> !<br />
Truly awesome (in the traditional sense)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158277</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 08:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Beaver@15; if you&#039;re still there, I found this on the Guardian crossword site:

April&#039;s Genius (No 94) by Puck produced slightly fewer entries than of late, 271 with 21 of them on the first day. The &#039;coding&#039; element involved or perhaps too many bank holiday weekends in the month may have been the reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Beaver@15; if you&#8217;re still there, I found this on the Guardian crossword site:</p>
<p>April&#8217;s Genius (No 94) by Puck produced slightly fewer entries than of late, 271 with 21 of them on the first day. The &#8216;coding&#8217; element involved or perhaps too many bank holiday weekends in the month may have been the reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gail saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158082</link>
		<dc:creator>gail saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 10:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree with Mr Beaver.The names of totally obscure wines as answers, and to be turned into gibberish, makes me wonder why I bothered with the rest!!!!!!!!!! Have just completed the next one (Lavatch) and found it much more enjoyable]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with Mr Beaver.The names of totally obscure wines as answers, and to be turned into gibberish, makes me wonder why I bothered with the rest!!!!!!!!!! Have just completed the next one (Lavatch) and found it much more enjoyable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158079</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 09:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re Egri Bikaver - when I finally found it, I was fortunate to be on a webpage (wikipedia?) that told me it was now mainly made with the Blaufrankisch grape!

By the way the Guardian made a lot of fuss about correcting the letter count for that clue - when it was pretty obvious what was meant and surely it makes no sense to divide gibberish up into two separate words anyway. I wonder if they&#039;d confused it with the &quot;litmus test&quot; word count (8d), which was a far more unfortunate mistake. It certainly wasted some of my time.

I found it a very satisfying puzzle, demanding but fun, but I wonder what I&#039;d have thought if I&#039;d never stumbled on that Egri Bikaver paragraph online.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Egri Bikaver &#8211; when I finally found it, I was fortunate to be on a webpage (wikipedia?) that told me it was now mainly made with the Blaufrankisch grape!</p>
<p>By the way the Guardian made a lot of fuss about correcting the letter count for that clue &#8211; when it was pretty obvious what was meant and surely it makes no sense to divide gibberish up into two separate words anyway. I wonder if they&#8217;d confused it with the &#8220;litmus test&#8221; word count (8d), which was a far more unfortunate mistake. It certainly wasted some of my time.</p>
<p>I found it a very satisfying puzzle, demanding but fun, but I wonder what I&#8217;d have thought if I&#8217;d never stumbled on that Egri Bikaver paragraph online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 23:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lovely blog, Jetdoc, thank you - and thanks to Puck for another delightful challenge.

I have written EGRI BIKAVER on my sheet so I obviously found it somewhere - don&#039;t ask me where!  As for 21, I did the same as John H and bunged the letters in - with F and H adjacent, from crossing answers, it was obvious that K was the omitted letter.

I got CORK before entering PORT (I dithered about PORT for ages - too obvious, I thought) so I was trying to uncork my wines by removing the first letter!  A whole Christmas tree lit up when the penny dropped - heads or tails?

I also liked the fact that Cork is a port.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely blog, Jetdoc, thank you &#8211; and thanks to Puck for another delightful challenge.</p>
<p>I have written EGRI BIKAVER on my sheet so I obviously found it somewhere &#8211; don&#8217;t ask me where!  As for 21, I did the same as John H and bunged the letters in &#8211; with F and H adjacent, from crossing answers, it was obvious that K was the omitted letter.</p>
<p>I got CORK before entering PORT (I dithered about PORT for ages &#8211; too obvious, I thought) so I was trying to uncork my wines by removing the first letter!  A whole Christmas tree lit up when the penny dropped &#8211; heads or tails?</p>
<p>I also liked the fact that Cork is a port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158037</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 18:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We struggled for ages with this, finally making enough headway to - almost - finish it, so it was frustrating to give up on 17/21.  But having seen the answers, I&#039;m glad we didn&#039;t waste yet more time on them!

There&#039;s enough of a challenge in the tortuous &#039;genius&#039; format without stooping to such obscurities.  One or two new words per crossword is fair game, but I felt these two were a bit below the belt.
I wonder how many correct entries there were?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We struggled for ages with this, finally making enough headway to &#8211; almost &#8211; finish it, so it was frustrating to give up on 17/21.  But having seen the answers, I&#8217;m glad we didn&#8217;t waste yet more time on them!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s enough of a challenge in the tortuous &#8216;genius&#8217; format without stooping to such obscurities.  One or two new words per crossword is fair game, but I felt these two were a bit below the belt.<br />
I wonder how many correct entries there were?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158025</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, jetdoc. At first glance, I thought this was going to be impossible, but I found a way in with TOKAY and gradually unpicked the rest, with the exception of 17ac and 21ac. At 21ac I entered all the right letters in the right order but never managed to make a wine out of it. With 17ac all I had were the checking letters.

Very enjoyable puzzle and I liked the C or K and P or T devices very much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, jetdoc. At first glance, I thought this was going to be impossible, but I found a way in with TOKAY and gradually unpicked the rest, with the exception of 17ac and 21ac. At 21ac I entered all the right letters in the right order but never managed to make a wine out of it. With 17ac all I had were the checking letters.</p>
<p>Very enjoyable puzzle and I liked the C or K and P or T devices very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158019</link>
		<dc:creator>John H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame about 21, as the clue didn&#039;t need to be solved to fix the entry - unless you were blogging it...Just rearrange the letters of the anagram in alphabetical order!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame about 21, as the clue didn&#8217;t need to be solved to fix the entry &#8211; unless you were blogging it&#8230;Just rearrange the letters of the anagram in alphabetical order!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158018</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jetdoc @8; none of &#039;is (oops!),&#039; &#039;it&#039; or even PORT has a C or K in it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jetdoc @8; none of &#8216;is (oops!),&#8217; &#8216;it&#8217; or even PORT has a C or K in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bridgesong</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/02/guardian-genius-94-by-puck-in-vino-veritas-2/#comment-158009</link>
		<dc:creator>bridgesong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 12:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29159#comment-158009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jetdoc, I also had difficulties with the two unfamiliar wines, but my internet searches eventually proved successful.  I certainly don&#039;t regard it as cheating when such obscure words are used.  I took the same view as Eileen over CORK - nice to be proved correct.  In other respects I thought it an excellent puzzle.  Thanks for the comprehensive blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jetdoc, I also had difficulties with the two unfamiliar wines, but my internet searches eventually proved successful.  I certainly don&#8217;t regard it as cheating when such obscure words are used.  I took the same view as Eileen over CORK &#8211; nice to be proved correct.  In other respects I thought it an excellent puzzle.  Thanks for the comprehensive blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
