<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,685 / Alberich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158339</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And we ended up (as we do frequently) in the NW.
The place where ORPHEUS was the solution we entered with me having Morpheus in mind and with us both having no clue what it was all about.
So, thanks smiffy!

Alberich&#039;s crosswords are always a joy to solve as I feel great affinity with his cluing style.
Usually, my PinC and I do the Guardian together after work, but Alberich is one of the few setters that overrule this daily routine of ours. Sorry, Shed!

Yet, I think this wasn&#039;t Alberich (fully) on top form.
Don&#039;t get me wrong, it was very good, but I missed the extra amount of misdirection and deviousness. And the &#039;lift &amp; separate&#039; device too. That said, it was there in eg the very clever AGEISM. Maybe, I&#039;m getting too used to his style.

While we didn&#039;t jump for joy after finding GRATIN, TACK, ACCOUNT, TEETOTAL and OCH, we did appreciate many other clues.
As there were, for example, 15ac (AGEISM), 26ac (OUTCAST), 29ac (ALLNIGHTER), 2d (AT PEACE), 3d (EYELESS AT GAZA) and above all the fantastic VAN DER POST (14d). 
Just brilliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And we ended up (as we do frequently) in the NW.<br />
The place where ORPHEUS was the solution we entered with me having Morpheus in mind and with us both having no clue what it was all about.<br />
So, thanks smiffy!</p>
<p>Alberich&#8217;s crosswords are always a joy to solve as I feel great affinity with his cluing style.<br />
Usually, my PinC and I do the Guardian together after work, but Alberich is one of the few setters that overrule this daily routine of ours. Sorry, Shed!</p>
<p>Yet, I think this wasn&#8217;t Alberich (fully) on top form.<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it was very good, but I missed the extra amount of misdirection and deviousness. And the &#8216;lift &amp; separate&#8217; device too. That said, it was there in eg the very clever AGEISM. Maybe, I&#8217;m getting too used to his style.</p>
<p>While we didn&#8217;t jump for joy after finding GRATIN, TACK, ACCOUNT, TEETOTAL and OCH, we did appreciate many other clues.<br />
As there were, for example, 15ac (AGEISM), 26ac (OUTCAST), 29ac (ALLNIGHTER), 2d (AT PEACE), 3d (EYELESS AT GAZA) and above all the fantastic VAN DER POST (14d).<br />
Just brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bracoman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158331</link>
		<dc:creator>Bracoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mine was also a game of two halves, but in this case it was the bottom half first and then the top.  I did like 14d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine was also a game of two halves, but in this case it was the bottom half first and then the top.  I did like 14d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malc95</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158329</link>
		<dc:creator>malc95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgot to mention 23a -
&quot;Former union returned&quot; NUR (National Union of Railwaymen, now the RMT) = RUN as well as being a hidden answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to mention 23a -<br />
&#8220;Former union returned&#8221; NUR (National Union of Railwaymen, now the RMT) = RUN as well as being a hidden answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malc95</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158326</link>
		<dc:creator>malc95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Alberich and smiffy.

Missed 15a (I had AVERSE, but clearly couldn&#039;t parse it), and couldn&#039;t fully parse 21d.
Loved 14d, but my c.o.d. was 12a.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alberich and smiffy.</p>
<p>Missed 15a (I had AVERSE, but clearly couldn&#8217;t parse it), and couldn&#8217;t fully parse 21d.<br />
Loved 14d, but my c.o.d. was 12a.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158323</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Van der Post is a classic! Literally made me laugh out loud. Unfortunately, I&#039;m at work...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van der Post is a classic! Literally made me laugh out loud. Unfortunately, I&#8217;m at work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmac</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158318</link>
		<dc:creator>jmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog Smiffy, particularly for explaining ORPHEUS. My experience was similar to yours, with the east side falling quite quickly, and the west side proving trickier. VAN DER POST eventually sorted it out for me. Too many great clues to mention,so only left to say thanks Alberich for a most entertaining puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog Smiffy, particularly for explaining ORPHEUS. My experience was similar to yours, with the east side falling quite quickly, and the west side proving trickier. VAN DER POST eventually sorted it out for me. Too many great clues to mention,so only left to say thanks Alberich for a most entertaining puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jezza</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Alberich for the puzzle - I really enjoyed this one, and to smiffy for the review.
I also liked the wordplay in 2d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Alberich for the puzzle &#8211; I really enjoyed this one, and to smiffy for the review.<br />
I also liked the wordplay in 2d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alberich</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/05/financial-times-13685-alberich/#comment-158314</link>
		<dc:creator>Alberich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=29275#comment-158314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the nice blog, Smiffy. It was Sod&#039;s Law that I wanted to print off as many crosswords as I could today to pass the time while dealing with Czech officialdom, only to find the FT was one of mine! A couple of points of interpretation: 17 down was meant to indicate VAN + RED&lt; + POST (what the van contains) - though I can see that this was perhaps ambiguous. 21 was supposed to be an &amp;lit - AC (current)+ COunt (count on, bank on) though on revisiting the clue I can see it looks like a (not very good) cryptic definition.

I hope I haven&#039;t butted in too early - I&#039;m not sure of the form on these matters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice blog, Smiffy. It was Sod&#8217;s Law that I wanted to print off as many crosswords as I could today to pass the time while dealing with Czech officialdom, only to find the FT was one of mine! A couple of points of interpretation: 17 down was meant to indicate VAN + RED&lt; + POST (what the van contains) &#8211; though I can see that this was perhaps ambiguous. 21 was supposed to be an &amp;lit &#8211; AC (current)+ COunt (count on, bank on) though on revisiting the clue I can see it looks like a (not very good) cryptic definition.</p>
<p>I hope I haven&#039;t butted in too early &#8211; I&#039;m not sure of the form on these matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
