Posted by Eileen on 26th May 2011
Philistine hasn’t yet got a profile on the Guardian website, let alone made it to Michael Curl’s ‘Who’s Who’, so I think we can take it that s/he is a new setter. This was somewhat disconcerting, especially on a Thursday, when we expect something rather challenging, but it turned out to be plain sailing. In fact, this would make an admirable Quiptic puzzle: as well as an abundance of anagrams, there is at least one example of just about every clue type imaginable [and some old favourites] with some wit thrown in at 12, 23 and 26ac and 9dn. A good puzzle for those still cutting their teeth on cryptics.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Guardian | 37 Comments »
Posted by Ringo on 26th May 2011
Enjoyable one, this, though not too challenging. If I were feeling crotchety, I’d say that a couple of the devices were a little hackneyed – but happily I’m not (today, at least), so instead I’ll call them agreeably old-school.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 4 Comments »
Posted by RatkojaRiku on 26th May 2011
For me, this puzzle was pitched at exactly the right level, offering me a manageable challenge and plenty of entertainment to start the day, as well as broadening my general knowledge – many thanks, Klingsor.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Independent | 10 Comments »
Posted by Agentzero on 26th May 2011
Monday Prize Crossword from May 16
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 2 Comments »
Posted by Pete Maclean on 26th May 2011
Prize puzzle from the Weekend FT of May 14
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FT | 7 Comments »