<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,333 / Gordius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-160009</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-160009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been a while since I completely finished a Grauniad puzzle, so this one was a bit refreshing in that regard.  Proceeded on a quarterly basis, mostly - had all the NE, then the SW, then the SE, and finally the NW, probably due to the quadrants being so isolated from each other, but heavily checked within themselves - I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever seen a puzzle grid with four checks in a row!  I did &quot;cheat&quot; slightly (used OneLook to search &quot;antena?a?&quot;) to get ANTENATAL, though I might have got there on my own with a bit more patience.

The &quot;bug&quot; thing didn&#039;t bug me at all - sure, I was thinking of beetles and such, but the other insectual clue/answer helped me veer away and when AMOEBA came out it made perfect sense - a person suffering from dysentery would certianly be said to &quot;have a bug&quot; - although perhaps that is more of a US usage?

Thanks for the blog, Gaufrid, since there were a few parsings I was weak on, and to Gordius for this less-than-usually tangled knot to unravel!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I completely finished a Grauniad puzzle, so this one was a bit refreshing in that regard.  Proceeded on a quarterly basis, mostly &#8211; had all the NE, then the SW, then the SE, and finally the NW, probably due to the quadrants being so isolated from each other, but heavily checked within themselves &#8211; I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever seen a puzzle grid with four checks in a row!  I did &#8220;cheat&#8221; slightly (used OneLook to search &#8220;antena?a?&#8221;) to get ANTENATAL, though I might have got there on my own with a bit more patience.</p>
<p>The &#8220;bug&#8221; thing didn&#8217;t bug me at all &#8211; sure, I was thinking of beetles and such, but the other insectual clue/answer helped me veer away and when AMOEBA came out it made perfect sense &#8211; a person suffering from dysentery would certianly be said to &#8220;have a bug&#8221; &#8211; although perhaps that is more of a US usage?</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog, Gaufrid, since there were a few parsings I was weak on, and to Gordius for this less-than-usually tangled knot to unravel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-160006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 18:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-160006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, this morning I was thinking about what RCWhiting&#039;s point re 23ac might be. At the same time, I reconsidered my criticism on the use of &quot;the new&quot; in that clue. 
Mike04, I agree with you now!
&#039;Nude is&#039; could be &#039;the new&#039; form of UNDIES (the answer).
Not much wrong with that (that said, I&#039;m still not sure what RCWhiting meant :))]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this morning I was thinking about what RCWhiting&#8217;s point re 23ac might be. At the same time, I reconsidered my criticism on the use of &#8220;the new&#8221; in that clue.<br />
Mike04, I agree with you now!<br />
&#8216;Nude is&#8217; could be &#8216;the new&#8217; form of UNDIES (the answer).<br />
Not much wrong with that (that said, I&#8217;m still not sure what RCWhiting meant <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike04</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159987</link>
		<dc:creator>mike04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 14:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sil @24
re 23dn

For &quot;the new&quot; Collins Dictionary gives &quot;(to be) set to replace the current vogue&quot; 
with this example: comedy is the new     rock&#039;n&#039;roll.

Is that not OK as an anagram indicator?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sil @24<br />
re 23dn</p>
<p>For &#8220;the new&#8221; Collins Dictionary gives &#8220;(to be) set to replace the current vogue&#8221;<br />
with this example: comedy is the new     rock&#8217;n'roll.</p>
<p>Is that not OK as an anagram indicator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159945</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 02:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gaufrid #27
You are, of course, right to correct my 23ac to 23down.
In all other respects you have completely missed the point!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaufrid #27<br />
You are, of course, right to correct my 23ac to 23down.<br />
In all other respects you have completely missed the point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrots</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159934</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 22:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fairly easy fare from Gordius but not without quite a few Gordian &quot;liberties&quot; spicing the pot. I couldn`t wait to get home to see what the usual suspects made of these, expecting Sil, Tupu and NeilW to be dancing with indignation at his affrontery...but `twas not to be. I fell among some old cronies hell bent on reliving times past, hence this late post.

I`ve a sneaking suspicion that Gordius seeks out stretched and inappropriate definitions, clumsy parsing and obscure usages just to wind the usual suspects up. I like a maverick and G. is the nearest we`ve got to one.

Not looking forward to the hangover tomorrow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairly easy fare from Gordius but not without quite a few Gordian &#8220;liberties&#8221; spicing the pot. I couldn`t wait to get home to see what the usual suspects made of these, expecting Sil, Tupu and NeilW to be dancing with indignation at his affrontery&#8230;but `twas not to be. I fell among some old cronies hell bent on reliving times past, hence this late post.</p>
<p>I`ve a sneaking suspicion that Gordius seeks out stretched and inappropriate definitions, clumsy parsing and obscure usages just to wind the usual suspects up. I like a maverick and G. is the nearest we`ve got to one.</p>
<p>Not looking forward to the hangover tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaufrid</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159931</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaufrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 22:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi RCWhiting
There is no 23ac so I assume you are referring to 23dn. Why do you consider this risqué? Is it the &#039;knickers&#039; or the &#039;undies&#039; or the &#039;nude&#039;? All of these terms are in common usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RCWhiting<br />
There is no 23ac so I assume you are referring to 23dn. Why do you consider this risqué? Is it the &#8216;knickers&#8217; or the &#8216;undies&#8217; or the &#8216;nude&#8217;? All of these terms are in common usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159930</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have waited until late but I am sadly disappointed that none of you have fainted at the use of such &quot;risqué&quot; language as 23ac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have waited until late but I am sadly disappointed that none of you have fainted at the use of such &#8220;risqué&#8221; language as 23ac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159925</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Sil - I liked 29a too, one of the nicest &amp;lits I&#039;ve seen for a while, with both heaven and the alternative giving the H - take your pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sil &#8211; I liked 29a too, one of the nicest &amp;lits I&#8217;ve seen for a while, with both heaven and the alternative giving the H &#8211; take your pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159923</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 19:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was tempting to compare this crossword with yesterday&#039;s Philistine - more or less the same level of difficulty. In that sense, I have to agree with NeilW @1 (though his &#039;any day&#039; wouldn&#039;t have been part of my verdict).
Yet, it is fairer to compare Gordius with Gordius. And then one must conclude that it was rather enjoyable.

We weren&#039;t happy with 9ac (HERBICIDE), for two reasons. Firstly the &#039;her&#039; bit that Geoff brought up, and which has now been justified by Eileen. Secondly, the &#039;short on ideas&#039; for IDE. But on second thoughts, that&#039;s OK too. When you&#039;re short on ideas, you don&#039;t have enough ideas, so you&#039;re missing something: IDE[as].

Despite what&#039;s been said about &#039;a bug&#039;, I&#039;m not convinced yet.
Apparently a certain AMOEBA might be seen as a bug, but that doesn&#039;t make &#039;a bug&#039; a good definition for AMOEBA, in my opinion.
Example: some felines are &#039;a pet&#039;, but that doesn&#039;t make &#039;a pet&#039; a suitable definition for FELINE.

Even so, as Geoff said @5, there was more right than wrong.
Nevertheless, I find it hard to single out a Clue of the Day.

The only really annoying thing in this crossword was 23ac.
&quot;Is nude the new knickers?&quot;
The word &#039;the&#039; is completely out of place here. Strictly speaking, as it is now, it means (IS NUDE THE)*.

29ac (DEATH) was surely one of the most amusing clues, but I wanted to tweak it immediately: &quot;Uncertain date for introduction to hell!!&quot; (either !! or a question mark)

Thanks Gaufrid for stepping in, and Gordius for filling in another hour or so of my life .... :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was tempting to compare this crossword with yesterday&#8217;s Philistine &#8211; more or less the same level of difficulty. In that sense, I have to agree with NeilW @1 (though his &#8216;any day&#8217; wouldn&#8217;t have been part of my verdict).<br />
Yet, it is fairer to compare Gordius with Gordius. And then one must conclude that it was rather enjoyable.</p>
<p>We weren&#8217;t happy with 9ac (HERBICIDE), for two reasons. Firstly the &#8216;her&#8217; bit that Geoff brought up, and which has now been justified by Eileen. Secondly, the &#8216;short on ideas&#8217; for IDE. But on second thoughts, that&#8217;s OK too. When you&#8217;re short on ideas, you don&#8217;t have enough ideas, so you&#8217;re missing something: IDE[as].</p>
<p>Despite what&#8217;s been said about &#8216;a bug&#8217;, I&#8217;m not convinced yet.<br />
Apparently a certain AMOEBA might be seen as a bug, but that doesn&#8217;t make &#8216;a bug&#8217; a good definition for AMOEBA, in my opinion.<br />
Example: some felines are &#8216;a pet&#8217;, but that doesn&#8217;t make &#8216;a pet&#8217; a suitable definition for FELINE.</p>
<p>Even so, as Geoff said @5, there was more right than wrong.<br />
Nevertheless, I find it hard to single out a Clue of the Day.</p>
<p>The only really annoying thing in this crossword was 23ac.<br />
&#8220;Is nude the new knickers?&#8221;<br />
The word &#8216;the&#8217; is completely out of place here. Strictly speaking, as it is now, it means (IS NUDE THE)*.</p>
<p>29ac (DEATH) was surely one of the most amusing clues, but I wanted to tweak it immediately: &#8220;Uncertain date for introduction to hell!!&#8221; (either !! or a question mark)</p>
<p>Thanks Gaufrid for stepping in, and Gordius for filling in another hour or so of my life &#8230;. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muck</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/05/27/guardian-25333-gordius/#comment-159920</link>
		<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30086#comment-159920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Geoff#21: I stand corrected]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Geoff#21: I stand corrected</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
