<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,337 / Crucible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160430</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about &#039;the oysters are ready to eat&#039;?

Just admit defeat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8216;the oysters are ready to eat&#8217;?</p>
<p>Just admit defeat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160421</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff - is a cooked chicked an animate object?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff &#8211; is a cooked chicked an animate object?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160419</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s perfectly possible to say, when Sunday lunch is ready: &#039;The chicken is ready to eat&#039;.  In context (and so many cryptic clues rely on phraseology taken out of context) this would be interpreted as &#039;the chicken is ready to be eaten&#039;.  So the construction doesn&#039;t only work with inanimate subjects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s perfectly possible to say, when Sunday lunch is ready: &#8216;The chicken is ready to eat&#8217;.  In context (and so many cryptic clues rely on phraseology taken out of context) this would be interpreted as &#8216;the chicken is ready to be eaten&#8217;.  So the construction doesn&#8217;t only work with inanimate subjects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160398</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff @60; basically, females don&#039;t fertilise anything; it&#039;s only the males.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff @60; basically, females don&#8217;t fertilise anything; it&#8217;s only the males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160397</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff, I hesitate to return to this issue, but it seems to me that in all the examples you quote the subject of the verb is an inanimate thing.  The implied passive construction therefore gives rise to no ambiguity because nobody would imagine that a house could occupy, or a car could drive.

The situation is different if the verb subject is animate.  If I am told that my grandson is &#039;ready to eat&#039; I go and get his tea ready, I do not imagine that he is being offered up for cannibalism.  There is a real distinction between the two constructions.  Given that fertlisation is an active process involving an animate female I believe that Robi has a point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, I hesitate to return to this issue, but it seems to me that in all the examples you quote the subject of the verb is an inanimate thing.  The implied passive construction therefore gives rise to no ambiguity because nobody would imagine that a house could occupy, or a car could drive.</p>
<p>The situation is different if the verb subject is animate.  If I am told that my grandson is &#8216;ready to eat&#8217; I go and get his tea ready, I do not imagine that he is being offered up for cannibalism.  There is a real distinction between the two constructions.  Given that fertlisation is an active process involving an animate female I believe that Robi has a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160392</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robi:  You can say &#039;the dinner is ready to eat&#039;, &#039;the suit is ready to wear&#039;, &#039;the latter is ready to post&#039;, &#039;the car is ready to drive&#039;, &#039;the house is ready to occupy&#039; etc etc.  This is a construction that can be employed with any transitive verb and gives it an unusual passive sense. Why not &#039;the female is ready to fertilise&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robi:  You can say &#8216;the dinner is ready to eat&#8217;, &#8216;the suit is ready to wear&#8217;, &#8216;the latter is ready to post&#8217;, &#8216;the car is ready to drive&#8217;, &#8216;the house is ready to occupy&#8217; etc etc.  This is a construction that can be employed with any transitive verb and gives it an unusual passive sense. Why not &#8216;the female is ready to fertilise&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160366</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi tupu @46 :) . Last comment on this. When you say: &#039;If a female is ready to fertilise,&#039; that is the nub of the discussion. A female is never ready to fertilise and there is no object to the verb because it can&#039;t happen. I would submit, therefore, that this expression cannot be turned around to &#039;she is ready to be fertilised.&#039; 

Anyway, another day another puzzle - let&#039;s see what today&#039;s brings if I have time to look at it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi tupu @46 <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . Last comment on this. When you say: &#8216;If a female is ready to fertilise,&#8217; that is the nub of the discussion. A female is never ready to fertilise and there is no object to the verb because it can&#8217;t happen. I would submit, therefore, that this expression cannot be turned around to &#8216;she is ready to be fertilised.&#8217; </p>
<p>Anyway, another day another puzzle &#8211; let&#8217;s see what today&#8217;s brings if I have time to look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob in wolves</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160356</link>
		<dc:creator>rob in wolves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[looking for themed clues would I be right to say that coq au vin is no spring chicken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looking for themed clues would I be right to say that coq au vin is no spring chicken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrots</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160353</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I`m ashamed to admit that I failed to finish this by quite a margin. Eileen`s helpful blog had me fired up with self-reproach, but the foregoing posts have put me firmly in my place. I shall remember Wolfie`s (@55) &quot;I do like a good Gerundive though&quot; for as long as I don`t discover what it means.

I always sensed Tupu was a bit of a rascal at heart and his confessions delight.

Maybe it will be the pleb`s turn tomorrow....where I can, once again, be a Flash Harry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`m ashamed to admit that I failed to finish this by quite a margin. Eileen`s helpful blog had me fired up with self-reproach, but the foregoing posts have put me firmly in my place. I shall remember Wolfie`s (@55) &#8220;I do like a good Gerundive though&#8221; for as long as I don`t discover what it means.</p>
<p>I always sensed Tupu was a bit of a rascal at heart and his confessions delight.</p>
<p>Maybe it will be the pleb`s turn tomorrow&#8230;.where I can, once again, be a Flash Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/01/guardian-25337-crucible/#comment-160351</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30229#comment-160351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Wolfie
Thanks again!
:) I met C.P.Snow only once. I went into a room where he was sitting, and he said &#039;I&#039;m Snow&#039;. I recognised him and replied &#039;I know&#039; and added &#039;I&#039;m tupu&#039; (more or less) but conversation did not blossom!
I never met Leavis, but did once drop a horse chestnut into a half-open umbrella he was holding behind his back in the market square. I suppose I was hoping for a Newtonian apple moment for him as it bounced off his head when he next opened the thing. Perhaps fortunately, it stayed dry but I would like to think it gave him food for thought eventually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Wolfie<br />
Thanks again!<br />
 <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I met C.P.Snow only once. I went into a room where he was sitting, and he said &#8216;I&#8217;m Snow&#8217;. I recognised him and replied &#8216;I know&#8217; and added &#8216;I&#8217;m tupu&#8217; (more or less) but conversation did not blossom!<br />
I never met Leavis, but did once drop a horse chestnut into a half-open umbrella he was holding behind his back in the market square. I suppose I was hoping for a Newtonian apple moment for him as it bounced off his head when he next opened the thing. Perhaps fortunately, it stayed dry but I would like to think it gave him food for thought eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
