<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic 604/Nutmeg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:04:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161189</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, took ages for all the above reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, took ages for all the above reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161170</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Thomas, you&#039;re right about LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED.  I still don&#039;t like the definition, though.  I&#039;ll amend the blog.  My recent Quiptic blogs seem to have been more edit than blog - either my solving&#039;s going downhill or there have been some tougher ones lately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Thomas, you&#8217;re right about LEAVE NO STONE UNTURNED.  I still don&#8217;t like the definition, though.  I&#8217;ll amend the blog.  My recent Quiptic blogs seem to have been more edit than blog &#8211; either my solving&#8217;s going downhill or there have been some tougher ones lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161169</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9,7 - I think &quot;on course&quot; supplies &quot;unturned&quot;. &quot;Leave no stone&quot; is what the jewel thieves do. I think it&#039;s a rather sophisticated clue for a Quiptic. The definition is a bit remote but the wordplay left no doubt so I didn&#039;t mind

3d - I agree it&#039;s an &amp;lit - putting up with the experience of one&#039;s teeth appearing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9,7 &#8211; I think &#8220;on course&#8221; supplies &#8220;unturned&#8221;. &#8220;Leave no stone&#8221; is what the jewel thieves do. I think it&#8217;s a rather sophisticated clue for a Quiptic. The definition is a bit remote but the wordplay left no doubt so I didn&#8217;t mind</p>
<p>3d &#8211; I agree it&#8217;s an &amp;lit &#8211; putting up with the experience of one&#8217;s teeth appearing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161167</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much more difficult than today&#039;s Rufus and not really appropriate for a Quiptic. I had to resort to a word search to get GANGRENE.

Thanks Pierre; I also failed on the parsing of LEGAL AID - I thought the upper-class young lady was DI again. I also noticed at the end that I had failed to complete BEVY.

I thought AUTOGRAPH ALBUM was a good clue; I was misled by thinking it must have been astro- something at first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much more difficult than today&#8217;s Rufus and not really appropriate for a Quiptic. I had to resort to a word search to get GANGRENE.</p>
<p>Thanks Pierre; I also failed on the parsing of LEGAL AID &#8211; I thought the upper-class young lady was DI again. I also noticed at the end that I had failed to complete BEVY.</p>
<p>I thought AUTOGRAPH ALBUM was a good clue; I was misled by thinking it must have been astro- something at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grandpuzzler</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161162</link>
		<dc:creator>grandpuzzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Nutmeg and Pierre.  Much more difficult for me than today&#039;s Rufus but I&#039;m not complaining.  Learned a new word - bevvy and a new phrase at 11ac.  Still not sure I understand TEETHE but that&#039;s ok.  Thought 5d was quite clever.

Cheers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Nutmeg and Pierre.  Much more difficult for me than today&#8217;s Rufus but I&#8217;m not complaining.  Learned a new word &#8211; bevvy and a new phrase at 11ac.  Still not sure I understand TEETHE but that&#8217;s ok.  Thought 5d was quite clever.</p>
<p>Cheers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161154</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pierre for this.
I more or less agree with canalonly @6 that the whole clue at 3dn gives the definition. I cannot see any other reading of it, so would call it a cryptic definition not an &quot;&amp; lit&quot;.
I think you have a typing error in 25ac: should not the enumeration be (4,3)?
Finally a minor point about 23ac which to me works more naturally as (LONE CHAP)* plus L.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pierre for this.<br />
I more or less agree with canalonly @6 that the whole clue at 3dn gives the definition. I cannot see any other reading of it, so would call it a cryptic definition not an &#8220;&amp; lit&#8221;.<br />
I think you have a typing error in 25ac: should not the enumeration be (4,3)?<br />
Finally a minor point about 23ac which to me works more naturally as (LONE CHAP)* plus L.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161151</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, canalonly.  I had the same thought, but then decided against that because you bare your teeth, not bear them.  But on reflection, I think you&#039;re right - it&#039;s an &amp;lit/all-in-one clue.  Perhaps a bit tricky for a Quiptic, but I guess if you&#039;re learning, then you&#039;ll need to get used to all the clue types eventually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, canalonly.  I had the same thought, but then decided against that because you bare your teeth, not bear them.  But on reflection, I think you&#8217;re right &#8211; it&#8217;s an &amp;lit/all-in-one clue.  Perhaps a bit tricky for a Quiptic, but I guess if you&#8217;re learning, then you&#8217;ll need to get used to all the clue types eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canalonly</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161147</link>
		<dc:creator>canalonly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think bearing with canine appearance is teething so the whole clue is the definition]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think bearing with canine appearance is teething so the whole clue is the definition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161146</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pierre. I share your qualms about some of the definitions, and actually found this quite a bit harder than today&#039;s Rufus.

I did laugh a 12d though, and there were some great clues here. IMO a bit tough for a quiptic.

Thanks Nutmeg.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pierre. I share your qualms about some of the definitions, and actually found this quite a bit harder than today&#8217;s Rufus.</p>
<p>I did laugh a 12d though, and there were some great clues here. IMO a bit tough for a quiptic.</p>
<p>Thanks Nutmeg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/13/guardian-quiptic-604nutmeg/#comment-161145</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30651#comment-161145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, both.  I was fixated on reducing &#039;beverage&#039; to &#039;bevvy&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, both.  I was fixated on reducing &#8216;beverage&#8217; to &#8216;bevvy&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
