<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,354 &#8211; Arachne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161888</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RCWhiting and tupu.

Fun to see two different parsings for the S.
Indeed, tupu, we went for your option.
It didn&#039;t worry us either, but given the fact that is a rather unusual thing to do, I would have expected some remark by some person at a site like this.
That&#039;s all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RCWhiting and tupu.</p>
<p>Fun to see two different parsings for the S.<br />
Indeed, tupu, we went for your option.<br />
It didn&#8217;t worry us either, but given the fact that is a rather unusual thing to do, I would have expected some remark by some person at a site like this.<br />
That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161878</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi RCWhiting and Sil

I assumed assets was parsed a + s(small) + set (class) + &#039;s (has). 

I imagine it is this parsing that Sil&#039;s comment refers to. I seem to remmber there was some argument about such use of the apostrophe some time ago. It does not particularly worry me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RCWhiting and Sil</p>
<p>I assumed assets was parsed a + s(small) + set (class) + &#8216;s (has). </p>
<p>I imagine it is this parsing that Sil&#8217;s comment refers to. I seem to remmber there was some argument about such use of the apostrophe some time ago. It does not particularly worry me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161863</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ref: the final &#039;S&#039; in &#039;assets&#039; (16d)
Although the term set in educational usage is most commonly found in secondary schools I have heard it used in primary schools.
There it refers to a &#039;table&#039; of pupils of similar ability. Hence several &#039;sets&#039; would make a class.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ref: the final &#8216;S&#8217; in &#8216;assets&#8217; (16d)<br />
Although the term set in educational usage is most commonly found in secondary schools I have heard it used in primary schools.<br />
There it refers to a &#8216;table&#8217; of pupils of similar ability. Hence several &#8216;sets&#8217; would make a class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161859</link>
		<dc:creator>JH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I proudly put ARMAGH into 7d, having confirmed with Google that there had been a rail disaster there, only to trip up when I realised what 6a was. Oops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I proudly put ARMAGH into 7d, having confirmed with Google that there had been a rail disaster there, only to trip up when I realised what 6a was. Oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrots</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161857</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With no &quot;aids&quot; available, I was obliged to guess the clues I could not parse. There were quite a few: BOW-WOW, HAVE NOTS, CALLUS, ORGANDIE, and LIMBER among them.

PAINTS, LIONEL MESSI (who he?) NODDER all stretched it a bit for me. 

But, thanks for stopping by, Arachne. I shall spot you immediately on Saturday: resplendent wearing a rug, mucky sandals and Wyeth hair-do....sporting a copy of &quot;The Psychology of Housework&quot; peeping from your Indian Bead satchel.

If you turn up with a red rose, ironed and furled copy of &quot;The Times&quot; and a bag by Prada, I am lost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With no &#8220;aids&#8221; available, I was obliged to guess the clues I could not parse. There were quite a few: BOW-WOW, HAVE NOTS, CALLUS, ORGANDIE, and LIMBER among them.</p>
<p>PAINTS, LIONEL MESSI (who he?) NODDER all stretched it a bit for me. </p>
<p>But, thanks for stopping by, Arachne. I shall spot you immediately on Saturday: resplendent wearing a rug, mucky sandals and Wyeth hair-do&#8230;.sporting a copy of &#8220;The Psychology of Housework&#8221; peeping from your Indian Bead satchel.</p>
<p>If you turn up with a red rose, ironed and furled copy of &#8220;The Times&#8221; and a bag by Prada, I am lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161856</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have the impression that Arachne&#039;s recent crosswords fluctuate in difficulty and whatever else can fluctuate.
But this one was in our opinion a real corker.

Yes, there was that &#039;mishap&#039; (in 5d) [mishap of the editor too, I guess :(]. 
Yes, was another &#039;mishap&#039; as a hidden in 7d, which we didn&#039;t like very much as &#039;hap&#039; was too obvious [I would have tried to find something like ....MISH A P...., I think].

But when one can write a clue like 12ac (WINDOW SEAT) of which we thought (like Dave Ellison) it was a cd, only to discover that clever construction, well ... wow!

Like others we couldn&#039;t parse UTTERS, but isn&#039;t this original?

A brilliant anagram for LIONEL MESSI - quite unbelievable that some people don&#039;t know who he is.
And 22ac (MEATLESS): another highlight.
3d (HAVE-NOTS) was our last, and it took a while to exactly find out why (even after finding the answer). But isn&#039;t that one of the reasons why it is such a good clue? (apart from its splendid surface)
And although I don&#039;t (want to) know anything about cricket, 23ac (DANUBE) is very clever (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Benaud).

On top of that, I think 1ac (PARDON) is just brilliant in its simplicity.

Gosh, why am I so enthusiastic about this puzzle?

[only a bit surprised that no-one so far commented on the final S in ASSETS]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have the impression that Arachne&#8217;s recent crosswords fluctuate in difficulty and whatever else can fluctuate.<br />
But this one was in our opinion a real corker.</p>
<p>Yes, there was that &#8216;mishap&#8217; (in 5d) [mishap of the editor too, I guess <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> ].<br />
Yes, was another &#8216;mishap&#8217; as a hidden in 7d, which we didn&#8217;t like very much as &#8216;hap&#8217; was too obvious [I would have tried to find something like ....MISH A P...., I think].</p>
<p>But when one can write a clue like 12ac (WINDOW SEAT) of which we thought (like Dave Ellison) it was a cd, only to discover that clever construction, well &#8230; wow!</p>
<p>Like others we couldn&#8217;t parse UTTERS, but isn&#8217;t this original?</p>
<p>A brilliant anagram for LIONEL MESSI &#8211; quite unbelievable that some people don&#8217;t know who he is.<br />
And 22ac (MEATLESS): another highlight.<br />
3d (HAVE-NOTS) was our last, and it took a while to exactly find out why (even after finding the answer). But isn&#8217;t that one of the reasons why it is such a good clue? (apart from its splendid surface)<br />
And although I don&#8217;t (want to) know anything about cricket, 23ac (DANUBE) is very clever (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Benaud" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Benaud</a>).</p>
<p>On top of that, I think 1ac (PARDON) is just brilliant in its simplicity.</p>
<p>Gosh, why am I so enthusiastic about this puzzle?</p>
<p>[only a bit surprised that no-one so far commented on the final S in ASSETS]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin P</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161854</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reminder of dear old Ritchie&#039;s broadcasts, less so for the one of napalm: all in all quite some mixture I thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder of dear old Ritchie&#8217;s broadcasts, less so for the one of napalm: all in all quite some mixture I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gm4hqf</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161848</link>
		<dc:creator>gm4hqf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog

I also got to this one late and HAVE NOTS stumped me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog</p>
<p>I also got to this one late and HAVE NOTS stumped me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161846</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arachne @32; &#039;One of my campaigns is to “out” the bisexuality of various words – no “chapesses” for me.&#039; Haven&#039;t got any response to whether a curtsy is a female bow or otherwise how bob=BOW works. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arachne @32; &#8216;One of my campaigns is to “out” the bisexuality of various words – no “chapesses” for me.&#8217; Haven&#8217;t got any response to whether a curtsy is a female bow or otherwise how bob=BOW works. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/21/guardian-25354-arachne/#comment-161845</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30903#comment-161845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;One of my campaigns is to “out” the bisexuality of various words – no “chapesses” for me&#039;

We&#039;ve noticed= hurrah!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;One of my campaigns is to “out” the bisexuality of various words – no “chapesses” for me&#8217;</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve noticed= hurrah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
