<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,356 / Gordius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162044</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m amazed at the number of responses this seemingly anodyne puzzle has generated - but thanks for your comments, everyone.

I&#039;m with you all the way, I think, Sil: see you Saturday - but it&#039;s a shame about your P in C! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed at the number of responses this seemingly anodyne puzzle has generated &#8211; but thanks for your comments, everyone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you all the way, I think, Sil: see you Saturday &#8211; but it&#8217;s a shame about your P in C! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162040</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162034</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, but it&#039;s always fun to make exacting requests of persons for detailed explanations of things that are clearly going to require a lot of explaining. You&#039;re just TOO sensible by half, Sil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but it&#8217;s always fun to make exacting requests of persons for detailed explanations of things that are clearly going to require a lot of explaining. You&#8217;re just TOO sensible by half, Sil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162031</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t we just simply accept that Gordius means:
1 credit card = 1 plastic, so 2 credit cards = 2 plastics.
Maybe even in the RCWhiting variant of +s = +s.
[don&#039;t worry, I know, it&#039;s linguistically wrong]

It is just not worth spending so much time on trying to explain it.
Well, that&#039;s what I think :).

As we all know, Gordius is a regular visitor of Sloppy &amp; Floppy Land. 

Very easy, this puzzle.
But always nice to see at least two fine clues: 1ac and 1d.

Thank you, Eileen, hope to meet you again this Saturday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t we just simply accept that Gordius means:<br />
1 credit card = 1 plastic, so 2 credit cards = 2 plastics.<br />
Maybe even in the RCWhiting variant of +s = +s.<br />
[don't worry, I know, it's linguistically wrong]</p>
<p>It is just not worth spending so much time on trying to explain it.<br />
Well, that&#8217;s what I think <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>As we all know, Gordius is a regular visitor of Sloppy &amp; Floppy Land. </p>
<p>Very easy, this puzzle.<br />
But always nice to see at least two fine clues: 1ac and 1d.</p>
<p>Thank you, Eileen, hope to meet you again this Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162029</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can never understand that film. The Usual Suspects, I mean. The plot has more holes in it than Wentworth. 

Perhaps credit cards are a strong temptation, but one might save face (7,7)

Sorry, but I&#039;m struggling very badly to see how that works, either as a whole or in parts. A credit card can be one&#039;s plastic singular, I suppose (even though most of us in the C21st would have more than one card), and credit cards are indeed referred to as &#039;plastic&#039;, but certainly never &#039;plastics&#039;, as the word fulfils both the singular and the plural case. That leaves, one suspects, either SURGE ON, or S and URGE ON.

To &#039;surge on&#039; would not be to strongly tempt as far as I&#039;m aware, but nor would &#039;urge on&#039;: that&#039;s to strongly encourage, isn&#039;t it? Even in Chambers Online Thesaurus (usually most generous, liberal and lavish with the meanings it assigns) &#039;tempt&#039; does not appear under &#039;urge&#039;. And S doesn&#039;t stand for strong on its own in any dictionary I possess.

So what then, grammarians? I must say I am not persuaded by your efforts so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can never understand that film. The Usual Suspects, I mean. The plot has more holes in it than Wentworth. </p>
<p>Perhaps credit cards are a strong temptation, but one might save face (7,7)</p>
<p>Sorry, but I&#8217;m struggling very badly to see how that works, either as a whole or in parts. A credit card can be one&#8217;s plastic singular, I suppose (even though most of us in the C21st would have more than one card), and credit cards are indeed referred to as &#8216;plastic&#8217;, but certainly never &#8216;plastics&#8217;, as the word fulfils both the singular and the plural case. That leaves, one suspects, either SURGE ON, or S and URGE ON.</p>
<p>To &#8216;surge on&#8217; would not be to strongly tempt as far as I&#8217;m aware, but nor would &#8216;urge on&#8217;: that&#8217;s to strongly encourage, isn&#8217;t it? Even in Chambers Online Thesaurus (usually most generous, liberal and lavish with the meanings it assigns) &#8216;tempt&#8217; does not appear under &#8216;urge&#8217;. And S doesn&#8217;t stand for strong on its own in any dictionary I possess.</p>
<p>So what then, grammarians? I must say I am not persuaded by your efforts so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrots</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162027</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got all but SCANSIONS in under half-a-pint, including changing EXHIBITOR for EXPOSITOR as the first one in.

There`s one thing to be said about Gordius....he usually prompts a fire-fight among the usual suspects, which I have a sneaky suspicion he does on purpose.

See y`all in Brummieland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got all but SCANSIONS in under half-a-pint, including changing EXHIBITOR for EXPOSITOR as the first one in.</p>
<p>There`s one thing to be said about Gordius&#8230;.he usually prompts a fire-fight among the usual suspects, which I have a sneaky suspicion he does on purpose.</p>
<p>See y`all in Brummieland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162022</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...............and even more common.....&#039;US&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;and even more common&#8230;..&#8217;US&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162018</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RCWhiting@23 and 35

Your reading of 8dn is what I intended to indicate in the blog. I&#039;m sorry if it wasn&#039;t clear. [Maybe I should have omitted the &#039;+&#039;. ]

Bamberger, it&#039;s worth filing away WE / OUR for Guardian / Guardian&#039;s, as it crops up quite a lot [and FT used in the same way on another thread].]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RCWhiting@23 and 35</p>
<p>Your reading of 8dn is what I intended to indicate in the blog. I&#8217;m sorry if it wasn&#8217;t clear. [Maybe I should have omitted the '+'. ]</p>
<p>Bamberger, it&#8217;s worth filing away WE / OUR for Guardian / Guardian&#8217;s, as it crops up quite a lot [and FT used in the same way on another thread].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162017</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen for the blog.

I am firmly in the camp of those who found this a pleasant and entertaining crossword, and who are puzzled by the tendency in some quarters to criticise Gordius for taking liberties that would be nodded through indulgently from other setters.

I liked 27ac very much.  Others have pointed out that the Achilles tendon is a real (not a metaphorical) vulnerability for athletes.  I would add that this is particularly the case in chilly weather - hence the importance of stretching and warming up the tendon before exercising when cold.  This makes the clue a particularly clever &amp;lit in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen for the blog.</p>
<p>I am firmly in the camp of those who found this a pleasant and entertaining crossword, and who are puzzled by the tendency in some quarters to criticise Gordius for taking liberties that would be nodded through indulgently from other setters.</p>
<p>I liked 27ac very much.  Others have pointed out that the Achilles tendon is a real (not a metaphorical) vulnerability for athletes.  I would add that this is particularly the case in chilly weather &#8211; hence the importance of stretching and warming up the tendon before exercising when cold.  This makes the clue a particularly clever &amp;lit in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/23/guardian-25356-gordius/#comment-162014</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=30986#comment-162014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1a &amp; 1d were catch 22 clues. Hard to solve without the checking letters from the answers that they started but harder to get those answers witout the first letters. Failed on 
3d -thought it an anagram of &quot;in poor sex&quot; . Had a crossing t from 13a so thought enters must be wrongCouldn&#039;t make a word of out &quot;in poor sex&quot; either.
7d Our=Guardians just didn&#039;t come to mind.
15d Didn&#039;t have enought crossing letters to have a stab.
20d Thought of caravan, tractor but again didn&#039;t have enough crossing letters to have a fair go.
12a I would never have got this. Didn&#039;t know the word and would have thought of scions for offshoots.
14a Brunel =engineer didn;t conme to mind. If I&#039;d had ?r?n?i , I might have got it but with only ????i, not much chance.
24a Again hard with only ????r to go on given the multitude of states and bearing =air isn&#039;t obvious to me.

So Gordius if you are reading this, at least person didn&#039;t think it was trivially easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1a &amp; 1d were catch 22 clues. Hard to solve without the checking letters from the answers that they started but harder to get those answers witout the first letters. Failed on<br />
3d -thought it an anagram of &#8220;in poor sex&#8221; . Had a crossing t from 13a so thought enters must be wrongCouldn&#8217;t make a word of out &#8220;in poor sex&#8221; either.<br />
7d Our=Guardians just didn&#8217;t come to mind.<br />
15d Didn&#8217;t have enought crossing letters to have a stab.<br />
20d Thought of caravan, tractor but again didn&#8217;t have enough crossing letters to have a fair go.<br />
12a I would never have got this. Didn&#8217;t know the word and would have thought of scions for offshoots.<br />
14a Brunel =engineer didn;t conme to mind. If I&#8217;d had ?r?n?i , I might have got it but with only ????i, not much chance.<br />
24a Again hard with only ????r to go on given the multitude of states and bearing =air isn&#8217;t obvious to me.</p>
<p>So Gordius if you are reading this, at least person didn&#8217;t think it was trivially easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
