<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7,707 / Crosophile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 07:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eimi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162762</link>
		<dc:creator>eimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should have spotted the envelopes/envelops thing, although it&#039;s not completely wrong. As Brian Greer told me, from his experience of living in the US, &quot;there isn&#039;t a noun that can&#039;t be verbed.&quot; Also, the OED has envelope as a colloquial verb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have spotted the envelopes/envelops thing, although it&#8217;s not completely wrong. As Brian Greer told me, from his experience of living in the US, &#8220;there isn&#8217;t a noun that can&#8217;t be verbed.&#8221; Also, the OED has envelope as a colloquial verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Keith Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162686</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Keith Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One part of the clue is a definition which usually exactly matches the tense and number of the answer. The other part the subsidiary indication or wordplay provides an alternative route to the answer this part would be a second definition in the case of double definition clues. One of the tasks of the solver is to find the boundary between definition and wordplay and insert a mental pause there when reading the clue cryptically. American cryptics usually require all words in a clue to be used in service of the wordplay or definition whereas British ones allow for more extraneous or supporting words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One part of the clue is a definition which usually exactly matches the tense and number of the answer. The other part the subsidiary indication or wordplay provides an alternative route to the answer this part would be a second definition in the case of double definition clues. One of the tasks of the solver is to find the boundary between definition and wordplay and insert a mental pause there when reading the clue cryptically. American cryptics usually require all words in a clue to be used in service of the wordplay or definition whereas British ones allow for more extraneous or supporting words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162670</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoped that a new setter would see me getting an elusive Indie unaided completed solve but nowhere near with this. At least it wasn&#039;t me who found this hard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoped that a new setter would see me getting an elusive Indie unaided completed solve but nowhere near with this. At least it wasn&#8217;t me who found this hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charybdis</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162663</link>
		<dc:creator>Charybdis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks RatkojaRiku for your excellent blog - hope I wasn&#039;t too scary! - and thanks for all other comments too. Pat, you&#039;re right of course with your spelling of envelops. At least it wasn&#039;t a misspelling (mispelling? :-)   ) in the grid - every setter&#039;s worst nightmare.   Hope I didn&#039;t offend too many fashionistas  (or is that fascinistas?) with the appearance of the dreaded magnolia...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks RatkojaRiku for your excellent blog &#8211; hope I wasn&#8217;t too scary! &#8211; and thanks for all other comments too. Pat, you&#8217;re right of course with your spelling of envelops. At least it wasn&#8217;t a misspelling (mispelling? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />    ) in the grid &#8211; every setter&#8217;s worst nightmare.   Hope I didn&#8217;t offend too many fashionistas  (or is that fascinistas?) with the appearance of the dreaded magnolia&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162661</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cor I struggled with this one especially NE and dresser where I spent a while looking at delists for cross off.

So thanks RatkojaRiku for explaining some stuff and Crosophile for the crossword]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cor I struggled with this one especially NE and dresser where I spent a while looking at delists for cross off.</p>
<p>So thanks RatkojaRiku for explaining some stuff and Crosophile for the crossword</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162659</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your usual fine blog, RatkojaRiku, for which thanks. First hurdle cleared by Crosophile: this made me smile. NOOK, REEDS and DRESSER hit the spot in that department. Beyond that, some intelligent clueing elsewhere and just the right degree of difficulty for me today.

But Crosophile has committed a bit of a faux pas with 16dn, I’m afraid. MAGNOLIA is just so passé, dahling – it’s bamboo white these days, please …]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your usual fine blog, RatkojaRiku, for which thanks. First hurdle cleared by Crosophile: this made me smile. NOOK, REEDS and DRESSER hit the spot in that department. Beyond that, some intelligent clueing elsewhere and just the right degree of difficulty for me today.</p>
<p>But Crosophile has committed a bit of a faux pas with 16dn, I’m afraid. MAGNOLIA is just so passé, dahling – it’s bamboo white these days, please …</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RatkojaRiku</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162647</link>
		<dc:creator>RatkojaRiku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Pat - thanks for spotting what must be a misprint in the online version at least, where the plural noun is used instead of the verb! I certainly hadn&#039;t noticed it when either solving or blogging the puzzle. Nor had I picked up on the use of GEN - I&#039;m sure purists would share you view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pat &#8211; thanks for spotting what must be a misprint in the online version at least, where the plural noun is used instead of the verb! I certainly hadn&#8217;t noticed it when either solving or blogging the puzzle. Nor had I picked up on the use of GEN &#8211; I&#8217;m sure purists would share you view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162628</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the excellent blog, RatkojaRiku.   I too enjoyed this puzzle which I found quite hard, esp the NE quarter in which as it happened my favourite two clues today were, SPACESUIT and HITHERTO.    As weak on films did not understand 19 down completely but the wordplay left no doubt about the answer.   Hardest clue and my last entry, MAGNOLIA.   Many thanks, Crosophile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent blog, RatkojaRiku.   I too enjoyed this puzzle which I found quite hard, esp the NE quarter in which as it happened my favourite two clues today were, SPACESUIT and HITHERTO.    As weak on films did not understand 19 down completely but the wordplay left no doubt about the answer.   Hardest clue and my last entry, MAGNOLIA.   Many thanks, Crosophile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NealH</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162621</link>
		<dc:creator>NealH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think envelopes in 2 down must be a misprint because the clue works just as well with envelop as envelope.  I also found this tricky to start with, but managed to complete it in reasonable time (for me).  There were a few like 5, 6 and 23 where I wasn&#039;t completely sure I&#039;d parsed the solution correctly, but RatkojaRiku has come up with the same thing.  There were lots of inventive clues - I liked 1 across and the use of the film titles in 19 down was very clever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think envelopes in 2 down must be a misprint because the clue works just as well with envelop as envelope.  I also found this tricky to start with, but managed to complete it in reasonable time (for me).  There were a few like 5, 6 and 23 where I wasn&#8217;t completely sure I&#8217;d parsed the solution correctly, but RatkojaRiku has come up with the same thing.  There were lots of inventive clues &#8211; I liked 1 across and the use of the film titles in 19 down was very clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/06/29/independent-7707-crosophile/#comment-162617</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31172#comment-162617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed this, too. But two weaknesses for me were, 1) the use of GEN as information in intersecting clues 26ac and 20dn, and 2) use of &quot;envelopes&quot; as a verb in 2dn &quot;Ruin envelopes cleric and Mendoza finally in The Mission&quot;. It has to be a verb for the surface, but if so surely &quot;envelops&quot;? Perhaps it&#039;s a misprint.

Good fun, for all that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this, too. But two weaknesses for me were, 1) the use of GEN as information in intersecting clues 26ac and 20dn, and 2) use of &#8220;envelopes&#8221; as a verb in 2dn &#8220;Ruin envelopes cleric and Mendoza finally in The Mission&#8221;. It has to be a verb for the surface, but if so surely &#8220;envelops&#8221;? Perhaps it&#8217;s a misprint.</p>
<p>Good fun, for all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
