<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cyclops 446: The poor bloody infantry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetdoc</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/#comment-163603</link>
		<dc:creator>jetdoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31307#comment-163603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, Jon88, though it’s a minor quibble. There are other words for the same collection of bits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Jon88, though it’s a minor quibble. There are other words for the same collection of bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon88</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/#comment-163492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon88</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31307#comment-163492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, it&#039;s the Eye and standard rules don&#039;t apply, but still, I have to award a demerit for having TACKLE in the grid and using &quot;tackle&quot; in exactly the same sense in the clue for 17d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, it&#8217;s the Eye and standard rules don&#8217;t apply, but still, I have to award a demerit for having TACKLE in the grid and using &#8220;tackle&#8221; in exactly the same sense in the clue for 17d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidey</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/#comment-163384</link>
		<dc:creator>sidey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31307#comment-163384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bamberger, there&#039;s a link on TimesfortheTimes to the thought processes of one of the championship entrants, worth a look.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bamberger, there&#8217;s a link on TimesfortheTimes to the thought processes of one of the championship entrants, worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/#comment-163335</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31307#comment-163335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was my fastest ever solve of a PE. Most of the solving consisted of eg 11a Um roof worker? Tiler maybe? reverse it and bingo relit. 
Now I know that this site doesn&#039;t go in for times unlike the Times blog site but it still took me over twice as long as the fastest Times solvers solve thiers .
Now I did have to have to have the odd pause but I really don&#039;t think I could have done it much faster. So how on earth do Times solvers do it in sub 10 minutes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was my fastest ever solve of a PE. Most of the solving consisted of eg 11a Um roof worker? Tiler maybe? reverse it and bingo relit.<br />
Now I know that this site doesn&#8217;t go in for times unlike the Times blog site but it still took me over twice as long as the fastest Times solvers solve thiers .<br />
Now I did have to have to have the odd pause but I really don&#8217;t think I could have done it much faster. So how on earth do Times solvers do it in sub 10 minutes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mystogre</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/cyclops-446-the-poor-bloody-infantry/#comment-163296</link>
		<dc:creator>Mystogre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 08:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31307#comment-163296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks jetdoc. I am pleased you coiuld explain the 8/9/22 because it completely defeated me. First time for a long while actually, so Cyclops has a scalp. But, then again, the intricacies of English politics are not a big thing here. The rest raised the odd smile and snigger (as usual) and I found the whole a pleasant way to pass an hour or so, until I was whipped. Good for the soul that, on occasions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks jetdoc. I am pleased you coiuld explain the 8/9/22 because it completely defeated me. First time for a long while actually, so Cyclops has a scalp. But, then again, the intricacies of English politics are not a big thing here. The rest raised the odd smile and snigger (as usual) and I found the whole a pleasant way to pass an hour or so, until I was whipped. Good for the soul that, on occasions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
