<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,365 / Rufus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163412</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 22:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thankyou Robi and tupu
I guess you are right but it is all a little unconvincing.
Dear old Azed does usually indicate when he is using obsolete meanings!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyou Robi and tupu<br />
I guess you are right but it is all a little unconvincing.<br />
Dear old Azed does usually indicate when he is using obsolete meanings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;‘Scandinavian’ = FINN is uncharacteristically sloppy for Rufus&quot; ?

- well, I didn&#039;t have any problems with 17d: if it&#039;s incorrect usage, I hadn&#039;t realised.
As others have said, I found this uncharacteristically &lt;b&gt;un-&lt;/b&gt;sloppy - the constructions were good, there were no non-cryptic cds, and far more wit than I usually find.
More in the same vein, please!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;‘Scandinavian’ = FINN is uncharacteristically sloppy for Rufus&#8221; ?</p>
<p>- well, I didn&#8217;t have any problems with 17d: if it&#8217;s incorrect usage, I hadn&#8217;t realised.<br />
As others have said, I found this uncharacteristically <b>un-</b>sloppy &#8211; the constructions were good, there were no non-cryptic cds, and far more wit than I usually find.<br />
More in the same vein, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163386</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 18:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Eileen 

Came very late to this today.  I found it largely very easy, although I was held up for a little while in the SW corner.  Elegantly clued, as ever.

Like others, I had AXLE briefly at 21a.

&#039;Scandinavian&#039; = FINN is uncharacteristically sloppy for Rufus.  Despite what Collins may say (and the other dictionaries pointedly don&#039;t) no Scandinavian would employ this usage - Nordic is the umbrella term, as tupu points out.  It&#039;s analogous to calling a Scot &#039;English&#039;, or (in Soviet days) a Ukranian &#039;Russian&#039; - loose terminology which is common outside the territories themselves.  Far from being a &#039;cultural usage&#039; it is actually (albeit mildly) culturally insensitive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eileen </p>
<p>Came very late to this today.  I found it largely very easy, although I was held up for a little while in the SW corner.  Elegantly clued, as ever.</p>
<p>Like others, I had AXLE briefly at 21a.</p>
<p>&#8216;Scandinavian&#8217; = FINN is uncharacteristically sloppy for Rufus.  Despite what Collins may say (and the other dictionaries pointedly don&#8217;t) no Scandinavian would employ this usage &#8211; Nordic is the umbrella term, as tupu points out.  It&#8217;s analogous to calling a Scot &#8216;English&#8217;, or (in Soviet days) a Ukranian &#8216;Russian&#8217; &#8211; loose terminology which is common outside the territories themselves.  Far from being a &#8216;cultural usage&#8217; it is actually (albeit mildly) culturally insensitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tupu</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163381</link>
		<dc:creator>tupu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI Robi and RCWhiting
I have just been delving into OED and come up with the same answer as Robi. Axis was used for an axle until the early C19, and axle there is defined as a pin etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Robi and RCWhiting<br />
I have just been delving into OED and come up with the same answer as Robi. Axis was used for an axle until the early C19, and axle there is defined as a pin etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163380</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RCWhiting @27; good point. The only explanation I can come up with is that Chambers gives AXIS as an obsolete variation of axle. The latter is defined as: &#039;the pin or rod in the nave of a wheel on or by means of which the wheel turns.&#039; That is probably why I tried &#039;axle&#039; as the answer at first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RCWhiting @27; good point. The only explanation I can come up with is that Chambers gives AXIS as an obsolete variation of axle. The latter is defined as: &#8216;the pin or rod in the nave of a wheel on or by means of which the wheel turns.&#8217; That is probably why I tried &#8216;axle&#8217; as the answer at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163377</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can someone explain &#039;axis&#039;please.
I get the revolver although, at least in theoretical maths an axis is invariable and therefoe doesn&#039;t revolve. It is the pin which I don&#039;t get - I chose (with no conviction) &#039;afix&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain &#8216;axis&#8217;please.<br />
I get the revolver although, at least in theoretical maths an axis is invariable and therefoe doesn&#8217;t revolve. It is the pin which I don&#8217;t get &#8211; I chose (with no conviction) &#8216;afix&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim morton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163375</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6 across
Independence Day in USA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 across<br />
Independence Day in USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim morton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 16:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6 across
Independence Dat in USA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 across<br />
Independence Dat in USA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chas</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163362</link>
		<dc:creator>chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robi @21 I looked at your link. To my eyes there seemed to be several different styles illustrated there. I guess that women still use the style but the name is not talked about as much as it used to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robi @21 I looked at your link. To my eyes there seemed to be several different styles illustrated there. I guess that women still use the style but the name is not talked about as much as it used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/04/guardian-25365-rufus/#comment-163353</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31312#comment-163353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog Eileen.  Rather surprisingly (to me, anyway), &quot;Where Did You Get That Hat?&quot; was first published as early as 1888. According to &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=13972&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;the melody is based partly on a leitmotiv from Wagner&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Lohengrin&lt;/i&gt;&quot;, but I&#039;m not enough of a Wagnerian to verify this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog Eileen.  Rather surprisingly (to me, anyway), &#8220;Where Did You Get That Hat?&#8221; was first published as early as 1888. According to <a href='http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=13972' rel="nofollow">this page</a>, &#8220;the melody is based partly on a leitmotiv from Wagner&#8217;s <i>Lohengrin</i>&#8220;, but I&#8217;m not enough of a Wagnerian to verify this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
