<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian 25,367 / Logodaedalus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxi Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-164697</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxi Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-164697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Scarpia ! Only just got back to this, and many thanks for the pointer. I rather like the sound of the trout amandine, although my chances of trying it in the near future are somewhat slim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scarpia ! Only just got back to this, and many thanks for the pointer. I rather like the sound of the trout amandine, although my chances of trying it in the near future are somewhat slim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163894</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 23:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Taxi Phil,
 Re.Meuniere,I&#039;m no culinary expert but Wiki gives a pretty good explanation -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meuniere_sauce]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Taxi Phil,<br />
 Re.Meuniere,I&#8217;m no culinary expert but Wiki gives a pretty good explanation -</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meuniere_sauce" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meuniere_sauce</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxi Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163870</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxi Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came to this a day late, and derived little pleasure from it. I feel less guilty about that since I was (for once) apparently in the majority ! I didn&#039;t much care for 25A (though I nailed it fairly quickly), 3D worked itself out once the crossing clues were solved.

But MY problem was 4D - &quot;meuniere&quot; is, to the best of my knowledge, served with sole ! Any culinary experts out there with a view on this ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came to this a day late, and derived little pleasure from it. I feel less guilty about that since I was (for once) apparently in the majority ! I didn&#8217;t much care for 25A (though I nailed it fairly quickly), 3D worked itself out once the crossing clues were solved.</p>
<p>But MY problem was 4D &#8211; &#8220;meuniere&#8221; is, to the best of my knowledge, served with sole ! Any culinary experts out there with a view on this ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163723</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks mhl.
Looks like a big thumbs down for Logodaedalus from most of us here!
Spotted the rhyming couplets early on(solving on paper still has some advantages)which made it easier to ignore a lot of the superfluous stuff in the clues. 
I agree,not the best puzzle ever but I didn&#039;t think it was that bad.
A bit too &#039;labyrinthine&#039; perhaps.

Derek@24 - there goes your reputation! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks mhl.<br />
Looks like a big thumbs down for Logodaedalus from most of us here!<br />
Spotted the rhyming couplets early on(solving on paper still has some advantages)which made it easier to ignore a lot of the superfluous stuff in the clues.<br />
I agree,not the best puzzle ever but I didn&#8217;t think it was that bad.<br />
A bit too &#8216;labyrinthine&#8217; perhaps.</p>
<p>Derek@24 &#8211; there goes your reputation! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163716</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh dear - as Sil says, &#039;Poor Logodaedalus&#039;.

Like Kathryn&#039;s Dad, I try to make a habit of not being [too] negative but I&#039;m still mystified by the rationale behind the cluing of this puzzle.

I agree with Geoff @20 that innovations should enhance, not detract from, a good puzzle but have to disagree with his, &quot;... his verse always scanned properly (as far as I recall). This doesn’t. Pity.&quot;

The scansion [and the rhyme - no dodgy homophones] of the verse here is, as far as I can see, impeccable. But that&#039;s the trouble: it&#039;s all at the expense of clumsy surfaces and sloppy cluing, eg superfluous &#039;one&#039; in 12ac and &#039;a&#039; in 20dn and other examples given above. 

I&#039;m still wondering - why so much pointless affort?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear &#8211; as Sil says, &#8216;Poor Logodaedalus&#8217;.</p>
<p>Like Kathryn&#8217;s Dad, I try to make a habit of not being [too] negative but I&#8217;m still mystified by the rationale behind the cluing of this puzzle.</p>
<p>I agree with Geoff @20 that innovations should enhance, not detract from, a good puzzle but have to disagree with his, &#8220;&#8230; his verse always scanned properly (as far as I recall). This doesn’t. Pity.&#8221;</p>
<p>The scansion [and the rhyme - no dodgy homophones] of the verse here is, as far as I can see, impeccable. But that&#8217;s the trouble: it&#8217;s all at the expense of clumsy surfaces and sloppy cluing, eg superfluous &#8216;one&#8217; in 12ac and &#8216;a&#8217; in 20dn and other examples given above. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still wondering &#8211; why so much pointless affort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163706</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor Logodaedalus.
Making a comeback after three quarters of a year with what he thought might be a corker ...
I do not want to rub more salt into the wounds, but I fear John @22 hits the nail on its head.
As did Matt @23 who mentioned a few things that were dubious in this puzzle, independent of the rhyming.
I am not sure whether I agree with Geoff @20 when he says &quot;Much as I welcome novelties in crosswords, I fear that this spoiled what could have been a perfectly good puzzle&quot;

To compensate the lack of Joy here, I more or less rushed through Orlando&#039;s quiptic this afternoon. Yes, I rushed through it, but what a good puzzle, full of Brilliant clues (with a capital B).
One that brought the Smile back on my face after this unfortunate offering.

Sorry, Logodaedalus.
We all have lesser days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Logodaedalus.<br />
Making a comeback after three quarters of a year with what he thought might be a corker &#8230;<br />
I do not want to rub more salt into the wounds, but I fear John @22 hits the nail on its head.<br />
As did Matt @23 who mentioned a few things that were dubious in this puzzle, independent of the rhyming.<br />
I am not sure whether I agree with Geoff @20 when he says &#8220;Much as I welcome novelties in crosswords, I fear that this spoiled what could have been a perfectly good puzzle&#8221;</p>
<p>To compensate the lack of Joy here, I more or less rushed through Orlando&#8217;s quiptic this afternoon. Yes, I rushed through it, but what a good puzzle, full of Brilliant clues (with a capital B).<br />
One that brought the Smile back on my face after this unfortunate offering.</p>
<p>Sorry, Logodaedalus.<br />
We all have lesser days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin H</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163698</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John @22 - yes, I completely agree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John @22 &#8211; yes, I completely agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhl</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163686</link>
		<dc:creator>mhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to everyone for their comments.  I can&#039;t believe I missed the rhyming couplets!

Eileen - thanks for your corrections, which I&#039;ve applied to the post.

In partial defence of 18, it&#039;s at least prompted me to listen to the score of My Fair Lady on Spotify, which is always great&#160;:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone for their comments.  I can&#8217;t believe I missed the rhyming couplets!</p>
<p>Eileen &#8211; thanks for your corrections, which I&#8217;ve applied to the post.</p>
<p>In partial defence of 18, it&#8217;s at least prompted me to listen to the score of My Fair Lady on Spotify, which is always great&nbsp;:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhl</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163684</link>
		<dc:creator>mhl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Derek Lazenby: I thought about mentioning the &quot;on&quot; in 21, but I think its use to mean &quot;put after&quot; is pretty common in both across and down clues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek Lazenby: I thought about mentioning the &#8220;on&#8221; in 21, but I think its use to mean &#8220;put after&#8221; is pretty common in both across and down clues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilW</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/06/guardian-25367-logodaedalus/#comment-163679</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31398#comment-163679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Stella

I think we&#039;re far enough on that Gaufrid won&#039;t mind... don&#039;t see your comment on yesterday&#039;s blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stella</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re far enough on that Gaufrid won&#8217;t mind&#8230; don&#8217;t see your comment on yesterday&#8217;s blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
