<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13749 PHSSTHPOK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165679</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International crossword, old boy! That *might* be why. Thanks for the correction, you slippery genius.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International crossword, old boy! That *might* be why. Thanks for the correction, you slippery genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165676</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re 25D, the AWEs have it!  Thanks Thomas99@1 for the explanation.  

But the clueing leaves me a bit puzzled, viz. &quot;some English people&quot;.  Why &quot;some&quot;, since MOST people surely pronounce &quot;or&quot; the standard way, homophonic with &quot;awe&quot;?  Or for that matter why &quot;English&quot; since it doesn&#039;t contribute any fodder to the wordplay - it is an English crossword after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re 25D, the AWEs have it!  Thanks Thomas99@1 for the explanation.  </p>
<p>But the clueing leaves me a bit puzzled, viz. &#8220;some English people&#8221;.  Why &#8220;some&#8221;, since MOST people surely pronounce &#8220;or&#8221; the standard way, homophonic with &#8220;awe&#8221;?  Or for that matter why &#8220;English&#8221; since it doesn&#8217;t contribute any fodder to the wordplay &#8211; it is an English crossword after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165671</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, scchua, for your nice blog of a puzzle that was (so far) the only one I did today.
I didn&#039;t find it easy - perhaps, because I have never done a P-K  before but, I fear, more because of the things walruss mentioned in #6.
He is fully right about &#039;lacked&#039; (1ac, should be &#039;lacking&#039;), &#039;had&#039; (4d, why not just &#039;has&#039; or, better, &#039;gets&#039;?) and the clumsiness of 13d.

However, my biggest complaint is about 24ac.
In Crosswordland &quot;A wears B&quot; means usually means: &quot;B around A&quot;.
Not here though.

On the positive side, I quite liked IMPEDIMENT (21ac), ONLY (22ac), 28ac (FRENETIC) and 5d (THELONGONE).

Agree with all the above on (my last entry) AWE, which is surely a homophone of &#039;or&#039; (otherwise).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, scchua, for your nice blog of a puzzle that was (so far) the only one I did today.<br />
I didn&#8217;t find it easy &#8211; perhaps, because I have never done a P-K  before but, I fear, more because of the things walruss mentioned in #6.<br />
He is fully right about &#8216;lacked&#8217; (1ac, should be &#8216;lacking&#8217;), &#8216;had&#8217; (4d, why not just &#8216;has&#8217; or, better, &#8216;gets&#8217;?) and the clumsiness of 13d.</p>
<p>However, my biggest complaint is about 24ac.<br />
In Crosswordland &#8220;A wears B&#8221; means usually means: &#8220;B around A&#8221;.<br />
Not here though.</p>
<p>On the positive side, I quite liked IMPEDIMENT (21ac), ONLY (22ac), 28ac (FRENETIC) and 5d (THELONGONE).</p>
<p>Agree with all the above on (my last entry) AWE, which is surely a homophone of &#8216;or&#8217; (otherwise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165670</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your point about

In pursuit of unknown amount of liquid crystal (6)

is a good one, in that you don&#039;t see the &#039;pursuit&#039; gag done in this way at all often. But I&#039;ve seen it done the other way (an element B goes after, ie is tagged onto the end of, an element A) often enough. 

25 dn looks like a dd to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your point about</p>
<p>In pursuit of unknown amount of liquid crystal (6)</p>
<p>is a good one, in that you don&#8217;t see the &#8216;pursuit&#8217; gag done in this way at all often. But I&#8217;ve seen it done the other way (an element B goes after, ie is tagged onto the end of, an element A) often enough. </p>
<p>25 dn looks like a dd to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165669</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correction to 8: Of course I meant 25dn not 25ac.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to 8: Of course I meant 25dn not 25ac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165668</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks scchua for this blog. There are some very nicely constructed clues, but others which are insufficiently precise for my taste. For example in 26ac, I do not see how the word order in the clue can be twisted to give Z following QUART.

I pondered 25ac for some time before writing in the W without much confidence. Some minutes later I thought of the explanation as given by Thomas99 @1 and decided it must be right. Anyway we shall find out in a few hours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks scchua for this blog. There are some very nicely constructed clues, but others which are insufficiently precise for my taste. For example in 26ac, I do not see how the word order in the clue can be twisted to give Z following QUART.</p>
<p>I pondered 25ac for some time before writing in the W without much confidence. Some minutes later I thought of the explanation as given by Thomas99 @1 and decided it must be right. Anyway we shall find out in a few hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cleaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165664</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cleaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your description of &#039;awkward&#039;, walruss, and I agree with your comment about cut and paste.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your description of &#8216;awkward&#8217;, walruss, and I agree with your comment about cut and paste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walruss</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165656</link>
		<dc:creator>walruss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An awkward puzzle. Why does this compiler have the past tense in his clues so often? &#039;Lacked&#039; in 1 across, &#039;had&#039; in 28 across? It does not work. I didn&#039;t like &#039;cut &amp; paste&#039; for an anagrind much either, in 11 &#039;who&#039; is only there to make the surface work, 13 down uses the past tense for a comtainer indicator in a clumsy clue, and what is &#039;to&#039; doing in 23 down? Not for me at all this one, which was the first I tackled today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An awkward puzzle. Why does this compiler have the past tense in his clues so often? &#8216;Lacked&#8217; in 1 across, &#8216;had&#8217; in 28 across? It does not work. I didn&#8217;t like &#8216;cut &amp; paste&#8217; for an anagrind much either, in 11 &#8216;who&#8217; is only there to make the surface work, 13 down uses the past tense for a comtainer indicator in a clumsy clue, and what is &#8216;to&#8217; doing in 23 down? Not for me at all this one, which was the first I tackled today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165651</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Bryan and Richard, the typo corrected.  I&#039;ve also edited my preamble, now that even my answer to 25D may be wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bryan and Richard, the typo corrected.  I&#8217;ve also edited my preamble, now that even my answer to 25D may be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/19/financial-times-13749-phssthpok/#comment-165646</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=31934#comment-165646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Thomas99 @ 1, I also had AWE for 25d.

I justified this to myself with A WE (English people) but, of course, some solvers will be non-English.

We&#039;ll find out for sure tomorrow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Thomas99 @ 1, I also had AWE for 25d.</p>
<p>I justified this to myself with A WE (English people) but, of course, some solvers will be non-English.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll find out for sure tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
