<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,747 by Mudd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/#comment-166202</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32191#comment-166202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sil, &quot;A bar or two&quot; refers to a fragment of a piece of music which is often referred to as a snatch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sil, &#8220;A bar or two&#8221; refers to a fragment of a piece of music which is often referred to as a snatch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/#comment-166197</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32191#comment-166197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SNATCH (1ac) was our last entry, but I&#039;m afraid that I still don&#039;t fully understand the clue. I know that a &#039;snatch&#039; is a weighlifting move, but what about the first part of the clue? According to your blog, Pete, it is a double definition. Can you please explain?

BTW, in the end we decided that it was a cryptic definition, the clue suggesting that one had to eat a couple of (eg muesli or Marts) bars to gain in weight. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SNATCH (1ac) was our last entry, but I&#8217;m afraid that I still don&#8217;t fully understand the clue. I know that a &#8216;snatch&#8217; is a weighlifting move, but what about the first part of the clue? According to your blog, Pete, it is a double definition. Can you please explain?</p>
<p>BTW, in the end we decided that it was a cryptic definition, the clue suggesting that one had to eat a couple of (eg muesli or Marts) bars to gain in weight. <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Maclean</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/#comment-166188</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Maclean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32191#comment-166188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan, I never did weight-lifting but in my youth I did buy a chest expander device called a Bull Worker.  It did not do much for me and I remain to this day a nine-stone weakling -- and now very contentedly so!

Jan, Ah I never thought about whether chows bark or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, I never did weight-lifting but in my youth I did buy a chest expander device called a Bull Worker.  It did not do much for me and I remain to this day a nine-stone weakling &#8212; and now very contentedly so!</p>
<p>Jan, Ah I never thought about whether chows bark or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/#comment-166168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32191#comment-166168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Pete, I agree, the puzzle lacked Mudd&#039;s usual sparkle.

I was going to query CHOW, thinking it was the dog which doesn&#039;t bark but I remembered that&#039;s the Basenji.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Pete, I agree, the puzzle lacked Mudd&#8217;s usual sparkle.</p>
<p>I was going to query CHOW, thinking it was the dog which doesn&#8217;t bark but I remembered that&#8217;s the Basenji.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/28/financial-times-13747-by-mudd/#comment-166159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32191#comment-166159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Pete for a wonderful analysis, as always.

However - unlike you - I did enjoy this puzzle which only proves different strokes for different folks. Many thanks Mudd.

I thought BOTTLE OPENER and WATERING HOLE were good; I didn&#039;t understand how ELOQUENT worked - until now; and I struggled in the NW corner after entering SCALES for 1a. There&#039;s nowt like a mistake to make things interesting!

When I finally unravelled SNATCH, it took me way back to my own weight-lifting days when - age 20 - I bought a set of weights with the hope of developing a Charles Atlas-type physique. At the time, I was very disappointed when I started losing weight, as if I wasn&#039;t thin enough ... Now, I&#039;m glad because I&#039;ve stayed slim whereas all my beef cake buddies has seen their muscles transformed into fat and, fortunately, I sold my weights at a profit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Pete for a wonderful analysis, as always.</p>
<p>However &#8211; unlike you &#8211; I did enjoy this puzzle which only proves different strokes for different folks. Many thanks Mudd.</p>
<p>I thought BOTTLE OPENER and WATERING HOLE were good; I didn&#8217;t understand how ELOQUENT worked &#8211; until now; and I struggled in the NW corner after entering SCALES for 1a. There&#8217;s nowt like a mistake to make things interesting!</p>
<p>When I finally unravelled SNATCH, it took me way back to my own weight-lifting days when &#8211; age 20 &#8211; I bought a set of weights with the hope of developing a Charles Atlas-type physique. At the time, I was very disappointed when I started losing weight, as if I wasn&#8217;t thin enough &#8230; Now, I&#8217;m glad because I&#8217;ve stayed slim whereas all my beef cake buddies has seen their muscles transformed into fat and, fortunately, I sold my weights at a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
