<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times 13,758 / Mudd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:20:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Button</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166301</link>
		<dc:creator>The Button</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 08:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went for the obvious Nevis too, but unfortuntely left it as the correct answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went for the obvious Nevis too, but unfortuntely left it as the correct answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166288</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to hear from again, Scarpia.
And, Richard Tauber - he was my father&#039;s heart delight!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear from again, Scarpia.<br />
And, Richard Tauber &#8211; he was my father&#8217;s heart delight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarpia</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166287</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarpia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid.
   As you say,a fairly straightforward puzzle from Mudd.All good fun though,my favourite clue being 24 across.
One other surviving monocle wearer is boxer Chris Eubank.
Other famous wearers include Percy Topliss(The monocled mutineer),Radclyffe Hall,the tenor Richard Tauber
and,in fiction,various P.G.Wodehouse characters and Wilkins Micawber(David Copperfield).
Also from Gilbert and Sullivan&#039;s &quot;Patience&quot; Reginald Bunthorne,the source of the pseudonym of the much missed crossword setter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid.<br />
   As you say,a fairly straightforward puzzle from Mudd.All good fun though,my favourite clue being 24 across.<br />
One other surviving monocle wearer is boxer Chris Eubank.<br />
Other famous wearers include Percy Topliss(The monocled mutineer),Radclyffe Hall,the tenor Richard Tauber<br />
and,in fiction,various P.G.Wodehouse characters and Wilkins Micawber(David Copperfield).<br />
Also from Gilbert and Sullivan&#8217;s &#8220;Patience&#8221; Reginald Bunthorne,the source of the pseudonym of the much missed crossword setter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166278</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog, Gaufrid.

Re the unusual number of double definitions: I&#039;ve pointed out, in my [tomorrow&#039;s] blog of last Saturday&#039;s Guardian [Paul] puzzle, that this had no fewer than eight - quite extraordinary, I thought.

I agree with Sil&#039;s favourite clues. [And Patrick Moore is the only person I ever remember seeing with a monocle, let alone being the only surviving one.]

Every good wish for your wedding day tomorrow, Mudd! :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog, Gaufrid.</p>
<p>Re the unusual number of double definitions: I&#8217;ve pointed out, in my [tomorrow's] blog of last Saturday&#8217;s Guardian [Paul] puzzle, that this had no fewer than eight &#8211; quite extraordinary, I thought.</p>
<p>I agree with Sil&#8217;s favourite clues. [And Patrick Moore is the only person I ever remember seeing with a monocle, let alone being the only surviving one.]</p>
<p>Every good wish for your wedding day tomorrow, Mudd! <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sil van den Hoek</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166276</link>
		<dc:creator>Sil van den Hoek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end, I am a bit with Gaufrid when he mentions &#039;double definitions&#039;. Don&#039;t know why, but Mudd seems to use them more than in his Paul and Punk puzzles. Not a good thing.

That said, it wasn&#039;t a walk-over for me [is it ever? :)].
I think MONOCLE, UNDERSCORE, DUNDERHEAD, COLOUFAST and GUFFAW stood out - that&#039;s five, not a bad underscore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, I am a bit with Gaufrid when he mentions &#8216;double definitions&#8217;. Don&#8217;t know why, but Mudd seems to use them more than in his Paul and Punk puzzles. Not a good thing.</p>
<p>That said, it wasn&#8217;t a walk-over for me [is it ever? <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ].<br />
I think MONOCLE, UNDERSCORE, DUNDERHEAD, COLOUFAST and GUFFAW stood out &#8211; that&#8217;s five, not a bad underscore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166275</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew @ 3

Of course, Patrick Moore!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew @ 3</p>
<p>Of course, Patrick Moore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166257</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gaufrid - I didn&#039;t find this as much of a walkover as you obviously did: the bottom half took me a lot longer than the top, though as is often the case there&#039;s no obvious reason for that when I look back.

Bryan, I think Sir Patrick Moore is probably the only surviving monocle-wearer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gaufrid &#8211; I didn&#8217;t find this as much of a walkover as you obviously did: the bottom half took me a lot longer than the top, though as is often the case there&#8217;s no obvious reason for that when I look back.</p>
<p>Bryan, I think Sir Patrick Moore is probably the only surviving monocle-wearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bracoman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166250</link>
		<dc:creator>Bracoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks for the blog. I,too, enjoyed both Paul and Mudd today.

I found this a little bit trickier than you did but it came out in the end.  I liked 24A and spent ages trying to find the connection between underscore and stranger before the penny eventually dropped.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for the blog. I,too, enjoyed both Paul and Mudd today.</p>
<p>I found this a little bit trickier than you did but it came out in the end.  I liked 24A and spent ages trying to find the connection between underscore and stranger before the penny eventually dropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/29/financial-times-13758-mudd/#comment-166248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32302#comment-166248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Gaufrid &amp; Mudd

Another enjoyable solve from today&#039;s Double Bill set by Mudd and the other fellow.

I entered MONOCLE but didn&#039;t understand the clue until now. Do people still wear monocles? I don&#039;t recall ever having see one except in old movies - for example: Ginger Rogers in 42nd Street (1933).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Gaufrid &amp; Mudd</p>
<p>Another enjoyable solve from today&#8217;s Double Bill set by Mudd and the other fellow.</p>
<p>I entered MONOCLE but didn&#8217;t understand the clue until now. Do people still wear monocles? I don&#8217;t recall ever having see one except in old movies &#8211; for example: Ginger Rogers in 42nd Street (1933).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
