Comments on: Enigmatic Variations No. 976 Wind by Kcit http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/30/enigmatic-variations-no-976-wind-by-kcit/ Never knowingly undersolved. Sat, 18 May 2013 18:15:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Mister Sting http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/30/enigmatic-variations-no-976-wind-by-kcit/#comment-166356 Mister Sting Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:32:21 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32277#comment-166356 As the scheduled blogger, I’d like to thank Mr. G for leaping into the fray when my arms and art failed me.
It’s a nice-looking puzzle, but, away from my regular solving partner, I just couldn’t quite make the necessary breakthroughs.

]]> By: Tony http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/30/enigmatic-variations-no-976-wind-by-kcit/#comment-166307 Tony Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:25:37 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32277#comment-166307 I thought there was a typo in 44 with examplar for exemplar until I learnt it was an archaic form of the more usual exemplar. Was there a particular reason for using the archaic form?

]]> By: Kcit http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/07/30/enigmatic-variations-no-976-wind-by-kcit/#comment-166296 Kcit Sat, 30 Jul 2011 03:47:51 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32277#comment-166296 There wasn’t a typo in 27a in the proof I sent back. (Well, there was, but I’d circled it and pointed arrows at it. They corrected the other one I spotted, so I can’t absolutely grumble. Well, not as much.)

PLAY-GOER is LAY (=lyric) + GO (success) in PER (=A). Yeah, PER = A is always nasty, and catches me out when I’m solving as well.

]]>