<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Quiptic 611 Beale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:37:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/#comment-166429</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 23:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32416#comment-166429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comments.
Agree with Robi re 5D surface; sorry Stella, had overlooked your comment first time round.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.<br />
Agree with Robi re 5D surface; sorry Stella, had overlooked your comment first time round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Lazenby</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/#comment-166426</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Lazenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32416#comment-166426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Der? Failed on Rufus now I failed on this. I finished one of Araucaria&#039;s harder ones the other week. Hmmm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der? Failed on Rufus now I failed on this. I finished one of Araucaria&#8217;s harder ones the other week. Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pommers</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/#comment-166425</link>
		<dc:creator>pommers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32416#comment-166425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Scchua and thanks for a good review.
This was too hard for a Quiptic IMO. At least, I solved the Rufus cryptic plus his DT offering together in less time than it took me to do this one! That&#039;s 2 hard Quiptics in a row - are they raising the bar? Don&#039;t mind personally but I thought the Quiptic was supposed to be on the gentle side?
Thanks to Beale for a bit of fun first thing this morning - a nice start to the week!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Scchua and thanks for a good review.<br />
This was too hard for a Quiptic IMO. At least, I solved the Rufus cryptic plus his DT offering together in less time than it took me to do this one! That&#8217;s 2 hard Quiptics in a row &#8211; are they raising the bar? Don&#8217;t mind personally but I thought the Quiptic was supposed to be on the gentle side?<br />
Thanks to Beale for a bit of fun first thing this morning &#8211; a nice start to the week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robi</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/#comment-166408</link>
		<dc:creator>Robi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32416#comment-166408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks scchua for a great blog (I&#039;m making up the numbers). I didn&#039;t get LES in STRAGGLERS, so thanks for the parsing - too difficult for a Quiptic methinks.

Like you, I tried to get VA into CREEPER, but it wouldn&#039;t go!

Stella; I guess &#039;return per share&#039; in 5 relates to amounts received from sales or dividends of stocks and shares.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks scchua for a great blog (I&#8217;m making up the numbers). I didn&#8217;t get LES in STRAGGLERS, so thanks for the parsing &#8211; too difficult for a Quiptic methinks.</p>
<p>Like you, I tried to get VA into CREEPER, but it wouldn&#8217;t go!</p>
<p>Stella; I guess &#8216;return per share&#8217; in 5 relates to amounts received from sales or dividends of stocks and shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/#comment-166403</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32416#comment-166403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Stella, thanks for commenting...sure is lonely here today!

1D NARRATOR is also slightly awkward.  I have the {} brackets round both ARRAN and ROT, ie. both to be reversed.  I know...that should make TORNARRA, strictly speaking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stella, thanks for commenting&#8230;sure is lonely here today!</p>
<p>1D NARRATOR is also slightly awkward.  I have the {} brackets round both ARRAN and ROT, ie. both to be reversed.  I know&#8230;that should make TORNARRA, strictly speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/01/guardian-quiptic-611-beale/#comment-166393</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32416#comment-166393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another great blog, scchua, but there are a couple of clues here I find a bit iffy for beginner level:

23ac, as you say, has a very awkward parsing - we&#039;ve only just started getting split words (&#039;horse+man&#039;) in normal cryptics;

In 5d, the surface reading means nothing, at least to me;

&#039;After&#039; in 16d could be taken as an (American) adverb, equivalent to &quot;afterwards&quot;, but it&#039;s dubious.

Also, there&#039;s a slight error in your parsing of 1d, in that ROT is reversed as well as ARRAN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great blog, scchua, but there are a couple of clues here I find a bit iffy for beginner level:</p>
<p>23ac, as you say, has a very awkward parsing &#8211; we&#8217;ve only just started getting split words (&#8216;horse+man&#8217;) in normal cryptics;</p>
<p>In 5d, the surface reading means nothing, at least to me;</p>
<p>&#8216;After&#8217; in 16d could be taken as an (American) adverb, equivalent to &#8220;afterwards&#8221;, but it&#8217;s dubious.</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s a slight error in your parsing of 1d, in that ROT is reversed as well as ARRAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
