<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times no.13,775 by ORENSE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/18/financial-times-no-13775-by-orense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/18/financial-times-no-13775-by-orense/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferret</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/18/financial-times-no-13775-by-orense/#comment-167707</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33164#comment-167707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight forward solve with the exception of entering Mali for 17A on the first pass......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight forward solve with the exception of entering Mali for 17A on the first pass&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ringo</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/18/financial-times-no-13775-by-orense/#comment-167679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ringo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33164#comment-167679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pelham. 

Re. 22ac, I&#039;m just not sure that &#039;store&#039; by itself is sufficient to define &#039;wardrobe&#039; - but I&#039;m just being picky. Fair points on the others, particularly 16dn - I agree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pelham. </p>
<p>Re. 22ac, I&#8217;m just not sure that &#8216;store&#8217; by itself is sufficient to define &#8216;wardrobe&#8217; &#8211; but I&#8217;m just being picky. Fair points on the others, particularly 16dn &#8211; I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/18/financial-times-no-13775-by-orense/#comment-167659</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33164#comment-167659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Orense and ringo. A pleasant crossword. I am inclined to agree that the second appearance of ration is unfortunate.

With this shape of grid I am on full nina alert these days and having found that 1ac, 9ac, and 11ac all began with A I was disappointed that the pattern was not continued - but that is not in any way a criticism.

I did not see any double duty in 22ac: I parsed it as Part of a hospital (WARD) gown (ROBE) in (linking word) store (WARDROBE) here (possibly redundant indication that store is the definition).

I would not call 14dn only half-cryptic. Although I have described the device of cluing a two-word phrase by defining each word individually as mundane, this clue has a nice surface and works for me.

A minor quibble with 16dn: I do not like &quot;role began&quot; for &quot;first letter of role&quot;. Would not &quot;beginning&quot; be better?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Orense and ringo. A pleasant crossword. I am inclined to agree that the second appearance of ration is unfortunate.</p>
<p>With this shape of grid I am on full nina alert these days and having found that 1ac, 9ac, and 11ac all began with A I was disappointed that the pattern was not continued &#8211; but that is not in any way a criticism.</p>
<p>I did not see any double duty in 22ac: I parsed it as Part of a hospital (WARD) gown (ROBE) in (linking word) store (WARDROBE) here (possibly redundant indication that store is the definition).</p>
<p>I would not call 14dn only half-cryptic. Although I have described the device of cluing a two-word phrase by defining each word individually as mundane, this clue has a nice surface and works for me.</p>
<p>A minor quibble with 16dn: I do not like &#8220;role began&#8221; for &#8220;first letter of role&#8221;. Would not &#8220;beginning&#8221; be better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
