<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Cryptic 25410 Bonxie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-172039</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-172039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks SCCHUA.

I get the Guardian Weekly and started this many weeks ago.  I got stuck in the NW corner like everyone else, and could not get it done.  I put it aside and forgot about it until yesterday.  The main problem was I had GOODBYE in for 2D.  I parsed it as Sound = Good [as in condition], at = by, and end of voice = e.  The whole clue being an &#039;and lit&#039; for GOODBYE.  I eventually persuaded myself that this could not be right and got EPIGRAM for 1A which led to PHONEME and GENTLE GIANT.

Very frustrating it is when you are convinced of a correct answer that then screws up everything else.

By the way my favourite and simplest tongue-twister is RED LORRY, YELLOW LORRY.  Almost impossible to say.

Best wishes
Gordon]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks SCCHUA.</p>
<p>I get the Guardian Weekly and started this many weeks ago.  I got stuck in the NW corner like everyone else, and could not get it done.  I put it aside and forgot about it until yesterday.  The main problem was I had GOODBYE in for 2D.  I parsed it as Sound = Good [as in condition], at = by, and end of voice = e.  The whole clue being an &#8216;and lit&#8217; for GOODBYE.  I eventually persuaded myself that this could not be right and got EPIGRAM for 1A which led to PHONEME and GENTLE GIANT.</p>
<p>Very frustrating it is when you are convinced of a correct answer that then screws up everything else.</p>
<p>By the way my favourite and simplest tongue-twister is RED LORRY, YELLOW LORRY.  Almost impossible to say.</p>
<p>Best wishes<br />
Gordon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168250</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Bodgel,I am not with you. See my comment @13 on Friday.
All the definitions you quote are suitably vague so as to make the cryptic part essential.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Bodgel,I am not with you. See my comment @13 on Friday.<br />
All the definitions you quote are suitably vague so as to make the cryptic part essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodgel</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168235</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodgel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I carried on pondering this one till today but abandoned it in the end - most clues were good, but I failed to get a critical mass of crossing letters.  And some of that was due (again) to imprecise definitions.

1a A saw is a commonplace - &quot;a stitch in time saves nine&quot;, not an epigram, which is a witty remark that an individual makes and others can only quote. (A good quota from scchua by the way.)
29a Grey-haired = elderly?  I know people who went grey in their 20s and others who have bright blue hair in their 80s ... &quot;grey-beard&quot; might work since Shakespeare used the phrase apparently with that meaning.
6d Rheumy does not mean cold and damp - it might mean having a cold.
9d Is it fair to give an example as a definition without any indication that the answer is the general class?
21d Best (adj.) = optimal.  &quot;The best&quot; (n.) as clued = optimum.
25d Acute means sharp, or as applied to illness, rapidly coming to a crisis.  The common cold is an acute illness.  Grave means serious, in the case of an illness suggesting a risk of death.  Confusing the two is a solecism.

But I think I might be on my own here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I carried on pondering this one till today but abandoned it in the end &#8211; most clues were good, but I failed to get a critical mass of crossing letters.  And some of that was due (again) to imprecise definitions.</p>
<p>1a A saw is a commonplace &#8211; &#8220;a stitch in time saves nine&#8221;, not an epigram, which is a witty remark that an individual makes and others can only quote. (A good quota from scchua by the way.)<br />
29a Grey-haired = elderly?  I know people who went grey in their 20s and others who have bright blue hair in their 80s &#8230; &#8220;grey-beard&#8221; might work since Shakespeare used the phrase apparently with that meaning.<br />
6d Rheumy does not mean cold and damp &#8211; it might mean having a cold.<br />
9d Is it fair to give an example as a definition without any indication that the answer is the general class?<br />
21d Best (adj.) = optimal.  &#8220;The best&#8221; (n.) as clued = optimum.<br />
25d Acute means sharp, or as applied to illness, rapidly coming to a crisis.  The common cold is an acute illness.  Grave means serious, in the case of an illness suggesting a risk of death.  Confusing the two is a solecism.</p>
<p>But I think I might be on my own here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex M</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168185</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much for the blog - very helpful. Didn&#039;t have a lot of time for the puzzle today - 21d was driving me mad. It was clearly &quot;optimal&quot; but I had no way in to it at all. So thanks for that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for the blog &#8211; very helpful. Didn&#8217;t have a lot of time for the puzzle today &#8211; 21d was driving me mad. It was clearly &#8220;optimal&#8221; but I had no way in to it at all. So thanks for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168179</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And also billdabanda6@6 for completing the tongue-twister.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And also billdabanda6@6 for completing the tongue-twister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168178</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to all for commenting, especially:

Geoff@7 - Will amend blog.

molonglo@4 - Hansard gives Harold Wilson as the originator of &quot;all the little gnomes in Zurich&quot; while he was Shadow Chancellor in 1956, though the phrase became prominent during the 1964 sterling crisis under Wilson&#039;s government.

mhl@12 - Got the names right, but not quite the connection.

grandpuzzler@15 - the title goes to you; you sure know your movies.  Just to add that Mel Brooks did also act in Men in Tights - as Rabbi Tuckman, counterpart to Friar Tuck.

Should you want to, and if you haven&#039;t seen them, there are more &quot;hidden connections&quot; in FT 13779 Gurney, FT 13773 Armonie, FT 13767 Phssthpok, and Quiptic 611 Beale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to all for commenting, especially:</p>
<p>Geoff@7 &#8211; Will amend blog.</p>
<p>molonglo@4 &#8211; Hansard gives Harold Wilson as the originator of &#8220;all the little gnomes in Zurich&#8221; while he was Shadow Chancellor in 1956, though the phrase became prominent during the 1964 sterling crisis under Wilson&#8217;s government.</p>
<p>mhl@12 &#8211; Got the names right, but not quite the connection.</p>
<p>grandpuzzler@15 &#8211; the title goes to you; you sure know your movies.  Just to add that Mel Brooks did also act in Men in Tights &#8211; as Rabbi Tuckman, counterpart to Friar Tuck.</p>
<p>Should you want to, and if you haven&#8217;t seen them, there are more &#8220;hidden connections&#8221; in FT 13779 Gurney, FT 13773 Armonie, FT 13767 Phssthpok, and Quiptic 611 Beale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168177</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I though that pig was a bit insulting for pious German, how did that get through the PC checker I wonder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I though that pig was a bit insulting for pious German, how did that get through the PC checker I wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCWhiting</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168171</link>
		<dc:creator>RCWhiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all
I mustn&#039;t (nor can I) claim any credit for my occasional complaint about too easy puzzles but this is the second (consecutive) day we have had a really good challenge. Well done Enigmatist and Bonxie.
The lower two thirds fell out quite quickly but boy, was I held up by the top third, especially the NW.
&#039;Gentle&#039; was hidden because I had &#039;phon(at)(e)&#039;.
I liked &#039;optimal&#039; and I also fell for the &#039;bull&#039; distraction at 13ac.
It took me a while to convince myself that 5ac was &#039;profile&#039; because I hesitated that prop was a column.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all<br />
I mustn&#8217;t (nor can I) claim any credit for my occasional complaint about too easy puzzles but this is the second (consecutive) day we have had a really good challenge. Well done Enigmatist and Bonxie.<br />
The lower two thirds fell out quite quickly but boy, was I held up by the top third, especially the NW.<br />
&#8216;Gentle&#8217; was hidden because I had &#8216;phon(at)(e)&#8217;.<br />
I liked &#8216;optimal&#8217; and I also fell for the &#8216;bull&#8217; distraction at 13ac.<br />
It took me a while to convince myself that 5ac was &#8216;profile&#8217; because I hesitated that prop was a column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168169</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Ellison @ 10:  My first thought was that the answer was an anagram of &#039;Ambridge&#039; (which I did eventually find), but having failed to get it at first I started to wonder whether the solution might be a term from archery....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Ellison @ 10:  My first thought was that the answer was an anagram of &#8216;Ambridge&#8217; (which I did eventually find), but having failed to get it at first I started to wonder whether the solution might be a term from archery&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grandpuzzler</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/08/25/guardian-cryptic-25410-bonxie/#comment-168166</link>
		<dc:creator>grandpuzzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33413#comment-168166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Bonxie for the puzzle and scchua for the picturesque blog.  Ambridge did take a while to anagram correctly.  I did like OPTIMAL - have we seen something similar recently?  Maybe I am misremembering as usual.  The pictures at 18,7:  Fairbanks, Flynn and Costner played Robin Hood while Mel Brooks (picture from Blazing Saddles) directed Robin Hood:  Men in Tights.

Cheers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Bonxie for the puzzle and scchua for the picturesque blog.  Ambridge did take a while to anagram correctly.  I did like OPTIMAL &#8211; have we seen something similar recently?  Maybe I am misremembering as usual.  The pictures at 18,7:  Fairbanks, Flynn and Costner played Robin Hood while Mel Brooks (picture from Blazing Saddles) directed Robin Hood:  Men in Tights.</p>
<p>Cheers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
