<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7762/Klingsor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:10:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168715</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 07:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent stuff from Klingsor, as usual.  One expects some musical connections from him, with ELGAR the obvious one here, and more remotely REVERB and NOSTALGIA (a music, or at least CD, genre according to some).  Last to go in, needing a word finder, was PEERAGE but a laugh out loud moment when I got it.

Favourites?  The aforesaid PEERAGE and the beautifully misdirected CONNECTICUT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff from Klingsor, as usual.  One expects some musical connections from him, with ELGAR the obvious one here, and more remotely REVERB and NOSTALGIA (a music, or at least CD, genre according to some).  Last to go in, needing a word finder, was PEERAGE but a laugh out loud moment when I got it.</p>
<p>Favourites?  The aforesaid PEERAGE and the beautifully misdirected CONNECTICUT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168644</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was an excellent puzzle from Klingsor.   Quite hard but not spectacularly so, I thought.  Some really great clueing - my favourites were DOSAGE, ELGAR, BURGEON, BREAK THE ICE and UNGAG.  Many thanks for the great blog, John.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was an excellent puzzle from Klingsor.   Quite hard but not spectacularly so, I thought.  Some really great clueing &#8211; my favourites were DOSAGE, ELGAR, BURGEON, BREAK THE ICE and UNGAG.  Many thanks for the great blog, John.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168637</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found 8d particularly hard, very crafty stuff - I was thinking of &quot;cut and run&quot; as a possible example of cut=give up. Superkiwigirl has a better one though - Chambers is usually the clincher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found 8d particularly hard, very crafty stuff &#8211; I was thinking of &#8220;cut and run&#8221; as a possible example of cut=give up. Superkiwigirl has a better one though &#8211; Chambers is usually the clincher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superkiwigirl</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168616</link>
		<dc:creator>superkiwigirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your blog, John, and for a very entertaining puzzle, Klingsor.

I agree with flashling that it&#039;s (t)OUGH + T in 9d, and that there&#039;s no problem with CUT= &quot;give up&quot; in 8d (Chambers lists &quot;to reject or renounce&quot;  for CUT as in &quot;to cut one&#039;s ties with one&#039;s family which seems to fit the bill nicely I think).

I loved some of the clues here today - PEERAGE is very clever, and so too is the misdirection in CONNECTICUT. BREAK THE ICE was another favorite, so too UNAWARE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your blog, John, and for a very entertaining puzzle, Klingsor.</p>
<p>I agree with flashling that it&#8217;s (t)OUGH + T in 9d, and that there&#8217;s no problem with CUT= &#8220;give up&#8221; in 8d (Chambers lists &#8220;to reject or renounce&#8221;  for CUT as in &#8220;to cut one&#8217;s ties with one&#8217;s family which seems to fit the bill nicely I think).</p>
<p>I loved some of the clues here today &#8211; PEERAGE is very clever, and so too is the misdirection in CONNECTICUT. BREAK THE ICE was another favorite, so too UNAWARE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, John, especially for parsing several that I couldn&#039;t.  Anybody else find this hardish?  NURTURE and AMPOULE were my best ones this morning.

I think CONNECTICUT just about works, although &#039;giving up&#039; is really &#039;cutting out&#039;.  It&#039;ll do for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, John, especially for parsing several that I couldn&#8217;t.  Anybody else find this hardish?  NURTURE and AMPOULE were my best ones this morning.</p>
<p>I think CONNECTICUT just about works, although &#8216;giving up&#8217; is really &#8216;cutting out&#8217;.  It&#8217;ll do for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168602</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lossings? losses! Klingsor as Alberecht has been around for a while methinks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lossings? losses! Klingsor as Alberecht has been around for a while methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/01/independent-7762klingsor/#comment-168601</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=33744#comment-168601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is 9 (t)OUGH +T and 8d Cut as in cutting ones lossings and giving up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 9 (t)OUGH +T and 8d Cut as in cutting ones lossings and giving up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
