<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Genius 98 &#8211; Crucible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crucible</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/#comment-169056</link>
		<dc:creator>Crucible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32636#comment-169056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your message, Katherine. You can please some of the people some of the time etc. Nice to know someone enjoyed it. I had originally thought the puzzle would be a suitable candidate for a Saturday slot (as many others seem to have done) but the instructions were perhaps too long for that. Regarding the anagram: I actually chose it for its relevance, thinking that solvers might enjoy a contemplative battle, with a whiff of pleasure. From the blogs it seems many didn&#039;t consider it a battle at all. And maybe I&#039;m too eager to justify it post hoc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your message, Katherine. You can please some of the people some of the time etc. Nice to know someone enjoyed it. I had originally thought the puzzle would be a suitable candidate for a Saturday slot (as many others seem to have done) but the instructions were perhaps too long for that. Regarding the anagram: I actually chose it for its relevance, thinking that solvers might enjoy a contemplative battle, with a whiff of pleasure. From the blogs it seems many didn&#8217;t consider it a battle at all. And maybe I&#8217;m too eager to justify it post hoc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/#comment-169015</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32636#comment-169015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the blog.  I liked this crossword and would much prefer puzzles such as these compared with the dreadful Auracaria Printers Devilry offering of a couple of months back.

I liked the surface readings of all these clues [unlike many in puzzles from some of the other seemingly more favoured compilers]

Genius puzzles are supposed to take 2-3 times longer than a normal puzzle and I think that is what it took me.

I was disappointed though that the unchecked letters that made the anagram SCENT OF A CONTEMPLATIVE BATTLE, whilst clever, was meaningless as it did not relate to anything at all.

Unlike Jan and Mr. Beaver [sounds like the name of a children&#039;s book!], I remembered about Roget, but could&#039;t find him.  So much for my search talents.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog.  I liked this crossword and would much prefer puzzles such as these compared with the dreadful Auracaria Printers Devilry offering of a couple of months back.</p>
<p>I liked the surface readings of all these clues [unlike many in puzzles from some of the other seemingly more favoured compilers]</p>
<p>Genius puzzles are supposed to take 2-3 times longer than a normal puzzle and I think that is what it took me.</p>
<p>I was disappointed though that the unchecked letters that made the anagram SCENT OF A CONTEMPLATIVE BATTLE, whilst clever, was meaningless as it did not relate to anything at all.</p>
<p>Unlike Jan and Mr. Beaver [sounds like the name of a children's book!], I remembered about Roget, but could&#8217;t find him.  So much for my search talents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/#comment-168922</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 17:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32636#comment-168922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Andrew - I forgot to look for the &#039;locked up&#039; Roget.  Not a particularly challenging puzzle so rather disappointing.

I really liked 20d once the penny dropped.  Fortunately, not in the middle of the night!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Andrew &#8211; I forgot to look for the &#8216;locked up&#8217; Roget.  Not a particularly challenging puzzle so rather disappointing.</p>
<p>I really liked 20d once the penny dropped.  Fortunately, not in the middle of the night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/#comment-168900</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32636#comment-168900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the general feeling this was an easier crossword than of late under the appallingly-named &#039;Genius&#039; variety. Sat down to this mid-month, and being a Crucible thought it would be on my solving table being gnawed at for a few days, but was surprised it very nearly got done at first swipe.  However, I had to sleep on 20d, but woke in euphoria around 2am barking out &#039;JEROME!&#039;. I think &#039;er indoors thought I&#039;d had a calling to greater things, and was a little annoyed by my admission it was a crossword clue that had been revealed to me. 
All in all a satisfying puzzle, especially 20d.(!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the general feeling this was an easier crossword than of late under the appallingly-named &#8216;Genius&#8217; variety. Sat down to this mid-month, and being a Crucible thought it would be on my solving table being gnawed at for a few days, but was surprised it very nearly got done at first swipe.  However, I had to sleep on 20d, but woke in euphoria around 2am barking out &#8216;JEROME!&#8217;. I think &#8216;er indoors thought I&#8217;d had a calling to greater things, and was a little annoyed by my admission it was a crossword clue that had been revealed to me.<br />
All in all a satisfying puzzle, especially 20d.(!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Beaver</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/#comment-168892</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Beaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32636#comment-168892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the explanation of the &#039;Dutch&#039; reference which had me foxed - also for the locked-up Roget, which I&#039;d missed.
But as you say, this was surprisingly tractable for a Genius, though it took a little while for the thesaurus penny to drop - it was ABSTRACT RELATIONS which rang a bell for me.

Still, no complaints, it&#039;s always a pleasure to be able to finish a Genius!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation of the &#8216;Dutch&#8217; reference which had me foxed &#8211; also for the locked-up Roget, which I&#8217;d missed.<br />
But as you say, this was surprisingly tractable for a Genius, though it took a little while for the thesaurus penny to drop &#8211; it was ABSTRACT RELATIONS which rang a bell for me.</p>
<p>Still, no complaints, it&#8217;s always a pleasure to be able to finish a Genius!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bridgesong</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/09/04/guardian-genius-98-crucible/#comment-168888</link>
		<dc:creator>bridgesong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=32636#comment-168888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comprehensive blog, Andrew.  I agree that this was less challenging than recent months; it&#039;ll be interesting to see if the first correct entry breaks any records!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comprehensive blog, Andrew.  I agree that this was less challenging than recent months; it&#8217;ll be interesting to see if the first correct entry breaks any records!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
