<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7,802/Anax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172229</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about got there when after long consideration I spotted the pattern having looked up &#039;charm&#039; in a thesaurus and found grisgris, a new word to me (and, btw, hyphenated).  But stuck on 26a; all I could think of to fit _O_S_O_S was &#039;couscous&#039; and no way (of course) could I make it fit the clue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about got there when after long consideration I spotted the pattern having looked up &#8216;charm&#8217; in a thesaurus and found grisgris, a new word to me (and, btw, hyphenated).  But stuck on 26a; all I could think of to fit _O_S_O_S was &#8216;couscous&#8217; and no way (of course) could I make it fit the clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anax</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172218</link>
		<dc:creator>anax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greetings all - many thanks to Ali for an excellent blog and to all for your kind comments.
This 1234/1234 pattern (I don&#039;t have a name for it either) is by no means new. I saw it used in (I think) a Times puzzle a couple of years ago but it was restricted, if I remember correctly, to four 8-letter answers at 90 degrees symmetrical rotation. This was by no means a weakness - just a limitation of the grid. The only reason I dared to attempt more in this puzzle was the Indy&#039;s policy of setter-designed grids, so I had the freedom to adapt it if things got sticky.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings all &#8211; many thanks to Ali for an excellent blog and to all for your kind comments.<br />
This 1234/1234 pattern (I don&#8217;t have a name for it either) is by no means new. I saw it used in (I think) a Times puzzle a couple of years ago but it was restricted, if I remember correctly, to four 8-letter answers at 90 degrees symmetrical rotation. This was by no means a weakness &#8211; just a limitation of the grid. The only reason I dared to attempt more in this puzzle was the Indy&#8217;s policy of setter-designed grids, so I had the freedom to adapt it if things got sticky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172199</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good grief (charlie brown) that was tough and failed on 17ac - never heard of it. The double word plays certainly helped but whilst I got 5 on first read through after that it was the usual struggle to see definitions let alone wordplay that&#039;s typical of Anax, much tougher than his Sunday Times recently.

Tough one to blog, thanks for that Ali, and a begrudging thank you to the setter :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief (charlie brown) that was tough and failed on 17ac &#8211; never heard of it. The double word plays certainly helped but whilst I got 5 on first read through after that it was the usual struggle to see definitions let alone wordplay that&#8217;s typical of Anax, much tougher than his Sunday Times recently.</p>
<p>Tough one to blog, thanks for that Ali, and a begrudging thank you to the setter <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Palmer</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172195</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the others I found this very hard going but rewarding.  The clue to OLIGARCHICAL was outstanding.  It was only after discovering the repeating pattern that I managed to finish the bottom part except for 26 across.  I was convinced it was going to be COUSCOUS but couldn&#039;t reconcile that with either a definition or wordplay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the others I found this very hard going but rewarding.  The clue to OLIGARCHICAL was outstanding.  It was only after discovering the repeating pattern that I managed to finish the bottom part except for 26 across.  I was convinced it was going to be COUSCOUS but couldn&#8217;t reconcile that with either a definition or wordplay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172192</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Thomas.  I see it now.  As Pontius Pilate says in Life of Brian: Welease Wodger! Welease Woderick!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Thomas.  I see it now.  As Pontius Pilate says in Life of Brian: Welease Wodger! Welease Woderick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172189</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[K&#039;s Dad - but you&#039;re reading it out wrong! It&#039;s a woman like Cicewo, not a woman like Sophia Lowen or Gina Lollobwigida!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K&#8217;s Dad &#8211; but you&#8217;re reading it out wrong! It&#8217;s a woman like Cicewo, not a woman like Sophia Lowen or Gina Lollobwigida!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nmsindy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172185</link>
		<dc:creator>nmsindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too found this very tough.   Thought I was going to be unable to solve any clue on first run through, but then got EYELESS, one of the last of the downs.     I eventually saw the pattern on the LHS and I was able to finish at a quicker pace after that, getting the words on the RHS which followed the same pattern.    Many thanks, Anax and Ali.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too found this very tough.   Thought I was going to be unable to solve any clue on first run through, but then got EYELESS, one of the last of the downs.     I eventually saw the pattern on the LHS and I was able to finish at a quicker pace after that, getting the words on the RHS which followed the same pattern.    Many thanks, Anax and Ali.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn's Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172181</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn's Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about managed it, but it was a long struggle.  Very good puzzle though, with POOH POOH and TESTES both priceless.  I didn&#039;t see the word patterns either: I think you just get so focused on solving the next clue that you don&#039;t step back to take a look at the big picture - which in this case would no doubt have helped.

I can usually now do an Anax more often than not if I can get a start - then perseverance is the key, since it&#039;s all there to get if you can see how it works.

If I have a nanoniggle, it&#039;s that the O sounds in WOMAN and ROMAN are different, so Wossy wouldn&#039;t actually pronounce it that way; but the clue was funny and setters get away with much worse, so well done to Anax for an excellent crossword and thank you to Ali for a very helpful blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about managed it, but it was a long struggle.  Very good puzzle though, with POOH POOH and TESTES both priceless.  I didn&#8217;t see the word patterns either: I think you just get so focused on solving the next clue that you don&#8217;t step back to take a look at the big picture &#8211; which in this case would no doubt have helped.</p>
<p>I can usually now do an Anax more often than not if I can get a start &#8211; then perseverance is the key, since it&#8217;s all there to get if you can see how it works.</p>
<p>If I have a nanoniggle, it&#8217;s that the O sounds in WOMAN and ROMAN are different, so Wossy wouldn&#8217;t actually pronounce it that way; but the clue was funny and setters get away with much worse, so well done to Anax for an excellent crossword and thank you to Ali for a very helpful blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanderer</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172180</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the best I can remember doing, and certainly one of the hardest. Among the many misdirections, I thought this was going to be a pangram -- in fact all letters are here except Q, and towards the end I was sure it was going to be used. Nope, wrong again! I noticed the double-word device, but not its symmetry, so it didn&#039;t help me as much as it should have done. 

I thought the clue for OLIGARCHICAL was outstanding. I don&#039;t know exactly what constitutes an &amp;lit clue, but is this one not an example of the whole clue defining the solution?

Many thanks to Anax and Ali.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best I can remember doing, and certainly one of the hardest. Among the many misdirections, I thought this was going to be a pangram &#8212; in fact all letters are here except Q, and towards the end I was sure it was going to be used. Nope, wrong again! I noticed the double-word device, but not its symmetry, so it didn&#8217;t help me as much as it should have done. </p>
<p>I thought the clue for OLIGARCHICAL was outstanding. I don&#8217;t know exactly what constitutes an &amp;lit clue, but is this one not an example of the whole clue defining the solution?</p>
<p>Many thanks to Anax and Ali.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/18/independent-7802anax/#comment-172177</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35498#comment-172177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Anax for an excellent crossword and Ali for the blog.

Like others, it took me a long time to get going, but I spotted the device from 1/9/10ac. Then 5/23/25ac were easy from the checking letters - 24/26ac slightly less so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Anax for an excellent crossword and Ali for the blog.</p>
<p>Like others, it took me a long time to get going, but I spotted the device from 1/9/10ac. Then 5/23/25ac were easy from the checking letters &#8211; 24/26ac slightly less so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
