Comments on: Financial Times 13,820 – Dante http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-13820-dante/ Never knowingly undersolved. Sat, 25 May 2013 19:19:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: John Newman http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-13820-dante/#comment-172327 John Newman Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:31:29 +0000 http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35548#comment-172327 Thanks Sil. I couldn’t get CEMENT. Don’t know why, easy isn’t it?

Shouldn’t 10 be double definition? “Cover” plus the cryptic “note may be put in this”.

TWEETER bothers me a little. I wrote it in as I knew the straight forward definition. But it is not very cryptic is it? Isn’t the word high also meant to refer to a bird which tweets?

cheers

John

]]>