<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times no.13,829 by BRADMAN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-no-13829-by-bradman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-no-13829-by-bradman/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyP</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-no-13829-by-bradman/#comment-172428</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35717#comment-172428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Ringo for the blog. As usual the Don in one of his disguises is too tough for me.

2ac - I think you mean &#039;kine&#039; rather than &#039;kines&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Ringo for the blog. As usual the Don in one of his disguises is too tough for me.</p>
<p>2ac &#8211; I think you mean &#8216;kine&#8217; rather than &#8216;kines&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeC</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-no-13829-by-bradman/#comment-172332</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35717#comment-172332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Bradman and Ringo. Mostly enjoyable. I too hazarded DOPE at 19. The doubling of D to M in 14 was a new device to me - neat!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bradman and Ringo. Mostly enjoyable. I too hazarded DOPE at 19. The doubling of D to M in 14 was a new device to me &#8211; neat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/20/financial-times-no-13829-by-bradman/#comment-172330</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35717#comment-172330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Bradman for the puzzle and Ringo for the blog.

I too found this comparatively hard going but generally satisfying, and finished on 19ac. Lots of very nice clues. I think my favourite must be 15dn for the misdirection with &quot;shed&quot;. I also enjoyed the misdirection at 1dn: for some time I was trying to use &quot;get hold of&quot; as an inclusion indicator.

14ac: I wrote in DISTRESS, but that required some twisting of the clue: your explanation makes it clear that MISTRESS is the better answer.

19ac: Not the Don at his best. The two meanings are consecutive definitions under the same headword in my 1998 &lt;i&gt;Chambers&lt;/i&gt; and there are so many other words that could have been used in the space.

28ac: As you imply, the formula used in this clue is often ambiguous. Here TENDER must be the correct answer, because RED NET is not really a proper phrase, and would have to be given as (3,3) if it were.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bradman for the puzzle and Ringo for the blog.</p>
<p>I too found this comparatively hard going but generally satisfying, and finished on 19ac. Lots of very nice clues. I think my favourite must be 15dn for the misdirection with &#8220;shed&#8221;. I also enjoyed the misdirection at 1dn: for some time I was trying to use &#8220;get hold of&#8221; as an inclusion indicator.</p>
<p>14ac: I wrote in DISTRESS, but that required some twisting of the clue: your explanation makes it clear that MISTRESS is the better answer.</p>
<p>19ac: Not the Don at his best. The two meanings are consecutive definitions under the same headword in my 1998 <i>Chambers</i> and there are so many other words that could have been used in the space.</p>
<p>28ac: As you imply, the formula used in this clue is often ambiguous. Here TENDER must be the correct answer, because RED NET is not really a proper phrase, and would have to be given as (3,3) if it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
