<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent 7809 by Crosophile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crosophile</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172810</link>
		<dc:creator>crosophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was incommunicado yesterday so herewith my belated thanks to Flashling and all the rest of you for what I found a particularly interesting discussion. I don&#039;t think there are now any unresolved lose ends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was incommunicado yesterday so herewith my belated thanks to Flashling and all the rest of you for what I found a particularly interesting discussion. I don&#8217;t think there are now any unresolved lose ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172807</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flashling @17.  My comment wasn&#039;t a criticism of the blog - far from it, it was fine.  What I meant was that in solving the crossword I got some answers because they could hardly be anything else and I needed the blog to explain them - which it did admirably.  And when I saw the explanations some of them were so simple I wondered why they hadn&#039;t occurred to me.  
Not really a criticism of the crossword or the setter either; just a comment on my own slowness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flashling @17.  My comment wasn&#8217;t a criticism of the blog &#8211; far from it, it was fine.  What I meant was that in solving the crossword I got some answers because they could hardly be anything else and I needed the blog to explain them &#8211; which it did admirably.  And when I saw the explanations some of them were so simple I wondered why they hadn&#8217;t occurred to me.<br />
Not really a criticism of the crossword or the setter either; just a comment on my own slowness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172794</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Allan_C, the problem being, how overt do we make these blogs? It&#039;s like explaining a joke. I tend to go for the well that&#039;s obvious now to me without the grandmother egg sucking.

The biggest issue for bloggers though is we have to solve and then write it up, this takes some time. A question I&#039;ve asked before but not had answered is how the lurkers want us to do this.

I&#039;d like Gaufrid to do a poll on the level of solving we provide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Allan_C, the problem being, how overt do we make these blogs? It&#8217;s like explaining a joke. I tend to go for the well that&#8217;s obvious now to me without the grandmother egg sucking.</p>
<p>The biggest issue for bloggers though is we have to solve and then write it up, this takes some time. A question I&#8217;ve asked before but not had answered is how the lurkers want us to do this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like Gaufrid to do a poll on the level of solving we provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan_C</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172792</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another of those crosswords where several of the answers &quot;can only be ....&quot; but I need the blog to follow the wordplay (and frequently then have an &quot;of course&quot; moment).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another of those crosswords where several of the answers &#8220;can only be &#8230;.&#8221; but I need the blog to follow the wordplay (and frequently then have an &#8220;of course&#8221; moment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172790</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So link words are bad unless done by Dac when it&#039;s a great surface? (not really aimed at you Wil :-)).
Re PeterO&#039;s comment about 1d being a DD aren&#039;t most clues really - a definition and a cryptic in some way definition. Oh well now I need an earlyish night as job interview tomorrow]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So link words are bad unless done by Dac when it&#8217;s a great surface? (not really aimed at you Wil <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).<br />
Re PeterO&#8217;s comment about 1d being a DD aren&#8217;t most clues really &#8211; a definition and a cryptic in some way definition. Oh well now I need an earlyish night as job interview tomorrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172789</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although, to be fair, it can &#039;seem&#039; as wrong as it likes - so long as it isn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, to be fair, it can &#8216;seem&#8217; as wrong as it likes &#8211; so long as it isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil Ransome</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172788</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil Ransome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That &#039;by&#039; in 1dn, which seems to be superfluous and is I think just a rather bad link-word made me look back at the clues, many of which have similar tiny prepositions which are used as link-words. Some people would call them padding:
&#039;for&#039; in 12ac; &#039;for&#039; in 22ac; &#039;of&#039; in 27ac; &#039;by&#039; in 1dn; &#039;for&#039; in 2dn; &#039;in&#039; in 17dn; &#039;when&#039; or &#039;when playing&#039; in 20dn.

There may be others I&#039;ve missed, and there may be a perfectly good reason for their existence which I&#039;ve also missed; these are all acceptable I think, but arguably less than elegant.

Otherwise, a good crossword, although I agree with the criticism of &#039;airs&#039;=&#039;posing&#039;; it may be justifiable grammatically, but it seems wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8216;by&#8217; in 1dn, which seems to be superfluous and is I think just a rather bad link-word made me look back at the clues, many of which have similar tiny prepositions which are used as link-words. Some people would call them padding:<br />
&#8216;for&#8217; in 12ac; &#8216;for&#8217; in 22ac; &#8216;of&#8217; in 27ac; &#8216;by&#8217; in 1dn; &#8216;for&#8217; in 2dn; &#8216;in&#8217; in 17dn; &#8216;when&#8217; or &#8216;when playing&#8217; in 20dn.</p>
<p>There may be others I&#8217;ve missed, and there may be a perfectly good reason for their existence which I&#8217;ve also missed; these are all acceptable I think, but arguably less than elegant.</p>
<p>Otherwise, a good crossword, although I agree with the criticism of &#8216;airs&#8217;='posing&#8217;; it may be justifiable grammatically, but it seems wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelham Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172784</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelham Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas99 @11:

17dn: I agree with everything you say.

15ac: If you take &quot;set&quot; as past tense it works with a singular subject, which is good enough for this self-styled purist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas99 @11:</p>
<p>17dn: I agree with everything you say.</p>
<p>15ac: If you take &#8220;set&#8221; as past tense it works with a singular subject, which is good enough for this self-styled purist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas99</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172783</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PeterO-
Re 17d I can see some might not think &quot;airs&quot; is quite the same as &quot;posing&quot; but I don&#039;t see any objection on grammatical grounds. &quot;Posing&quot; is the gerund, the nounal form of the verb, so it can certainly stand in for another noun. It&#039;s true you talk about &quot;putting on airs&quot; and probably not &quot;putting on posing&quot; but it is the same part of speech and means much the same thing. &quot;What do you object to about him?&quot; &quot;Oh, his posing - so pretentious&quot;/&quot;Oh, his airs - so pretentious&quot; - they&#039;re very similar. Certainly a sound clue for me.
Re 15a - the question is whether &quot;set&quot; works in the plural. I&#039;ve seen it used quite often though. Here the words for &quot;provide a spur to&quot;, i.e. &quot;stir up&quot;, set - provide a setting for - &quot;r&quot;. But some people think only &quot;sets&quot; makes sense in the cryptic reading. I tend to disagree but a strict Ximenean probably wouldn&#039;t.
Re 24a - I&#039;ve no idea what the &quot;freezing&quot; of a pointer has to do with it. The clue says that a Red Setter may be partly a Pointer, which from a look at wikipedia appears to be right. And the other reading is of course &quot;Red sky at night [i.e. sun red when it sets], shepherd&#039;s delight 
[i.e. good weather tomorrow]&quot;.

I share your concern about &quot;by&quot; in 1d. When I solved it I thought &quot;by&quot; was part of the definition, because I thought the housing of a bolt was called the escape. It seems I was imagining things. I can&#039;t believe Crosophile would use a totally superflous word, so I&#039;m a bit confused about that one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PeterO-<br />
Re 17d I can see some might not think &#8220;airs&#8221; is quite the same as &#8220;posing&#8221; but I don&#8217;t see any objection on grammatical grounds. &#8220;Posing&#8221; is the gerund, the nounal form of the verb, so it can certainly stand in for another noun. It&#8217;s true you talk about &#8220;putting on airs&#8221; and probably not &#8220;putting on posing&#8221; but it is the same part of speech and means much the same thing. &#8220;What do you object to about him?&#8221; &#8220;Oh, his posing &#8211; so pretentious&#8221;/&#8221;Oh, his airs &#8211; so pretentious&#8221; &#8211; they&#8217;re very similar. Certainly a sound clue for me.<br />
Re 15a &#8211; the question is whether &#8220;set&#8221; works in the plural. I&#8217;ve seen it used quite often though. Here the words for &#8220;provide a spur to&#8221;, i.e. &#8220;stir up&#8221;, set &#8211; provide a setting for &#8211; &#8220;r&#8221;. But some people think only &#8220;sets&#8221; makes sense in the cryptic reading. I tend to disagree but a strict Ximenean probably wouldn&#8217;t.<br />
Re 24a &#8211; I&#8217;ve no idea what the &#8220;freezing&#8221; of a pointer has to do with it. The clue says that a Red Setter may be partly a Pointer, which from a look at wikipedia appears to be right. And the other reading is of course &#8220;Red sky at night [i.e. sun red when it sets], shepherd&#8217;s delight<br />
[i.e. good weather tomorrow]&#8220;.</p>
<p>I share your concern about &#8220;by&#8221; in 1d. When I solved it I thought &#8220;by&#8221; was part of the definition, because I thought the housing of a bolt was called the escape. It seems I was imagining things. I can&#8217;t believe Crosophile would use a totally superflous word, so I&#8217;m a bit confused about that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashling</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/10/26/independent-7809-by-crosophile/#comment-172777</link>
		<dc:creator>flashling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=35933#comment-172777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm doing blog late at night after a few is probably a bad idea it seems, thanks for the corrections and good spot on PATIO NMS - i missed that entirely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm doing blog late at night after a few is probably a bad idea it seems, thanks for the corrections and good spot on PATIO NMS &#8211; i missed that entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
