<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyman 3396/30 October 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/</link>
	<description>Never knowingly undersolved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:24:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173661</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think, jackkt, that the &#039;old&#039; part of the clue is indicating that &#039;smashed&#039; as a definition of &#039;bankrupt&#039; is an archaic usage.  My SOED gives it as mid-nineteenth century, and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s used now in that sense.

Thank you to Everyman for stopping by.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, jackkt, that the &#8216;old&#8217; part of the clue is indicating that &#8216;smashed&#8217; as a definition of &#8216;bankrupt&#8217; is an archaic usage.  My SOED gives it as mid-nineteenth century, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s used now in that sense.</p>
<p>Thank you to Everyman for stopping by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackkt</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173659</link>
		<dc:creator>jackkt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw the BANKRUPT clue as a triple definition so I am pleased to have this confirmed by the setter however I still don&#039;t understand &quot;old&quot;. &quot;Smashed&quot; = &quot;bankrupt&quot; so why &quot;smashed old&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the BANKRUPT clue as a triple definition so I am pleased to have this confirmed by the setter however I still don&#8217;t understand &#8220;old&#8221;. &#8220;Smashed&#8221; = &#8220;bankrupt&#8221; so why &#8220;smashed old&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyman</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173656</link>
		<dc:creator>Everyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 13:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re BANKRUPT
Sorry to have caused confusion.
A clue of three definitions, smashed old, bust, and on the rocks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re BANKRUPT<br />
Sorry to have caused confusion.<br />
A clue of three definitions, smashed old, bust, and on the rocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173655</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks all for the comments.

Bamberger, it was a tricky one in my opinion too, but generally the Everyman is aimed at less experienced solvers, certainly (which is why I put my hand up to blog it).

Wolfie and Stella, that&#039;s ingenious, but I&#039;m still not convinced!  Nice quote from Macbeth, though.

And couldn&#039;t agree more - one person&#039;s difficult is another person&#039;s easy.  Otherwise crosswords would be boring.

I know that Everyman has dropped in on the blog in the past, so if he does today, he can perhaps let us know how he intended BANKRUPT to be understood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks all for the comments.</p>
<p>Bamberger, it was a tricky one in my opinion too, but generally the Everyman is aimed at less experienced solvers, certainly (which is why I put my hand up to blog it).</p>
<p>Wolfie and Stella, that&#8217;s ingenious, but I&#8217;m still not convinced!  Nice quote from Macbeth, though.</p>
<p>And couldn&#8217;t agree more &#8211; one person&#8217;s difficult is another person&#8217;s easy.  Otherwise crosswords would be boring.</p>
<p>I know that Everyman has dropped in on the blog in the past, so if he does today, he can perhaps let us know how he intended BANKRUPT to be understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stella Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173653</link>
		<dc:creator>Stella Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 11:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pierre and Everyman. I don&#039;t remember this being particularly hard, though it does seem Everyman&#039;s getting just a little more erudite of late.

I understood a BANKRUPT as Wolfie did, with &quot;smashed&quot; as the definition, then it&#039;s RUPT, an old word for broken or &quot;bust&quot;, &quot;on&quot;, ie. &#039;after&#039;, BANK - when you &quot;bank&quot; a craft, you are &quot;on the rocks&quot;.

I don&#039;t think ALEPPO is particularly obscure as one of the important ancient cities, but no doubt it depends on the individual.

There&#039;s an echo in today&#039;s puzzle which suggests Everyman may have a particular field of interest which, at least for me, is &quot;obscure&quot; :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pierre and Everyman. I don&#8217;t remember this being particularly hard, though it does seem Everyman&#8217;s getting just a little more erudite of late.</p>
<p>I understood a BANKRUPT as Wolfie did, with &#8220;smashed&#8221; as the definition, then it&#8217;s RUPT, an old word for broken or &#8220;bust&#8221;, &#8220;on&#8221;, ie. &#8216;after&#8217;, BANK &#8211; when you &#8220;bank&#8221; a craft, you are &#8220;on the rocks&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think ALEPPO is particularly obscure as one of the important ancient cities, but no doubt it depends on the individual.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an echo in today&#8217;s puzzle which suggests Everyman may have a particular field of interest which, at least for me, is &#8220;obscure&#8221; <img src='http://www.fifteensquared.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173648</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pierre,

For 6d (OUTSPOKEN), I interpreted rung=spoke as in spoke on the telephone. I think your reading is better.

For some reason, I didn&#039;t think this was much harder than usual but there was an Everyman recently that I thought was considerably more difficult but no-one else commented to that effect. So, everyone is different.

I particularly liked ALEPPO (excellent surface), WEIRDO (amusing), SHERATON, LANDING STRIP (excellent surface) and FLAMENCO (excellent surface).

Thanks Everyman]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pierre,</p>
<p>For 6d (OUTSPOKEN), I interpreted rung=spoke as in spoke on the telephone. I think your reading is better.</p>
<p>For some reason, I didn&#8217;t think this was much harder than usual but there was an Everyman recently that I thought was considerably more difficult but no-one else commented to that effect. So, everyone is different.</p>
<p>I particularly liked ALEPPO (excellent surface), WEIRDO (amusing), SHERATON, LANDING STRIP (excellent surface) and FLAMENCO (excellent surface).</p>
<p>Thanks Everyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173645</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Pierre -

Thanks for the blog.  I read 26d the other way round. &#039;Smashed&#039; I think is the definition - the OED gives one of the meanings of the word as &#039;insolvent&#039;. A bank could be a rocky shelf at sea upon which a ship could founder, or be &#039;rupt&#039;.

I remembered Aleppo from a speech by the first witch in &#039;Macbeth&#039;:
&#039;Her husband&#039;s to Aleppo gone, master o&#039; th&#039; tiger&#039;.

An entertaining offering from Everyman, a little tougher than usual, I thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pierre -</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog.  I read 26d the other way round. &#8216;Smashed&#8217; I think is the definition &#8211; the OED gives one of the meanings of the word as &#8216;insolvent&#8217;. A bank could be a rocky shelf at sea upon which a ship could founder, or be &#8216;rupt&#8217;.</p>
<p>I remembered Aleppo from a speech by the first witch in &#8216;Macbeth&#8217;:<br />
&#8216;Her husband&#8217;s to Aleppo gone, master o&#8217; th&#8217; tiger&#8217;.</p>
<p>An entertaining offering from Everyman, a little tougher than usual, I thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scchua</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173644</link>
		<dc:creator>scchua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Pierre and Everyman.

Agree that it&#039;s a harder than usual Everyman.

26A BUNKRUPT.  I had 2 alternatives: first: like yours with &quot;smashed&quot; unexplained, and second: as a triple defn - smashed (financially)=bust=on the rocks, but that leaves &quot;old&quot; unexplained.

I think in 15D TOP DRAWER, it&#039;s prize=reward reversed and trophy=pot (informally or slang) reversed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pierre and Everyman.</p>
<p>Agree that it&#8217;s a harder than usual Everyman.</p>
<p>26A BUNKRUPT.  I had 2 alternatives: first: like yours with &#8220;smashed&#8221; unexplained, and second: as a triple defn &#8211; smashed (financially)=bust=on the rocks, but that leaves &#8220;old&#8221; unexplained.</p>
<p>I think in 15D TOP DRAWER, it&#8217;s prize=reward reversed and trophy=pot (informally or slang) reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamberger</title>
		<link>http://www.fifteensquared.net/2011/11/06/everyman-339630-october-2011/#comment-173643</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 08:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fifteensquared.net/?p=36132#comment-173643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very clear blog -thanks.

I thought this was too hard for an Everyman with 4a, 9a, 24a,26a, 6d &amp; 16d being very hard in my book. If it is the Times, it probably can&#039;t be &quot;too hard&quot; but like the Quiptic, isn&#039;t this supposed to cater for lesser mortals?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very clear blog -thanks.</p>
<p>I thought this was too hard for an Everyman with 4a, 9a, 24a,26a, 6d &amp; 16d being very hard in my book. If it is the Times, it probably can&#8217;t be &#8220;too hard&#8221; but like the Quiptic, isn&#8217;t this supposed to cater for lesser mortals?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
